• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年癌症患者的评估与管理:SIOG外科特别工作组关于外科医生态度的调查

The assessment and management of older cancer patients: A SIOG surgical task force survey on surgeons' attitudes.

作者信息

Ghignone F, van Leeuwen B L, Montroni I, Huisman M G, Somasundar P, Cheung K L, Audisio R A, Ugolini G

机构信息

University of Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Department of Surgery, Via Giuseppe Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Surgery, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;42(2):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.004
PMID:26718329
Abstract

AIM

The Surgical Task Force at SIOG (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) designed this survey to explore the surgical oncologists' approach toward elderly cancer patients.

METHODS

A web-based survey was sent to all members of ESSO (European Society of Surgical Oncology) and SSO (Society of Surgical Oncology).

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-one surgeons responded (11% response rate) with a main interest on breast (62.1%), colorectal (43%) and hepatobiliary (27.4%) surgery. Almost all surgeons (>90%) offer surgery regardless the patient's age; only 48% consider mandatory a preoperative frailty assessment. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, nutritional and performance status are most frequently used as screening tools; only 6.4% surgeons use Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in daily practice and collaboration with geriatricians is low (36.3%). If proven to be effective, the majority of surgeons (71%) is prepared to pre-habilitate patients for up to 4 weeks before surgery. One in two surgeons would not offer an operation to patients with impaired cognitive status; conversely, one in three would proceed to surgery regardless of the patient's cognitive status, if functional capacity is conserved. Quality of life and functional recovery are regarded as the most important endpoints in onco-geriatric surgery. Large "real life" prospective observational studies and randomized controlled trials are demanded.

CONCLUSION

Age is not perceived as a limitation to surgery. Screening for frailty is limited. A thorough CGA is seldom used and collaboration with geriatricians is rather uncommon. There is a need for clinical investigations focusing on pre-habilitation and other strategies to achieve better functional recovery.

摘要

目的

国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)手术特别工作组设计了这项调查,以探究外科肿瘤学家对老年癌症患者的治疗方法。

方法

向欧洲外科肿瘤学会(ESSO)和外科肿瘤学会(SSO)的所有成员发送了一项基于网络的调查。

结果

251名外科医生做出了回应(回应率为11%),他们主要关注乳腺癌(62.1%)、结直肠癌(43%)和肝胆外科手术(27.4%)。几乎所有外科医生(>90%)无论患者年龄大小都提供手术;只有48%的医生认为术前进行衰弱评估是必要的。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、营养状况和体能状态是最常用的筛查工具;只有6.4%的外科医生在日常实践中使用综合老年评估(CGA),并且与老年病医生的合作较少(36.3%)。如果被证明有效,大多数外科医生(71%)准备在手术前对患者进行长达4周的术前康复训练。每两名外科医生中有一名不会为认知状态受损的患者进行手术;相反,如果功能能力得以保留,每三名外科医生中有一名会不顾患者的认知状态而进行手术。生活质量和功能恢复被视为老年肿瘤外科中最重要的终点。需要进行大型“真实生活”前瞻性观察研究和随机对照试验。

结论

年龄不被视为手术的限制因素。对衰弱的筛查有限。很少使用全面的CGA,与老年病医生的合作也相当少见。需要开展侧重于术前康复训练和其他实现更好功能恢复策略的临床研究。

相似文献

1
The assessment and management of older cancer patients: A SIOG surgical task force survey on surgeons' attitudes.老年癌症患者的评估与管理:SIOG外科特别工作组关于外科医生态度的调查
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Feb;42(2):297-302. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
2
Role of Geriatric Oncologists in Optimizing Care of Urological Oncology Patients.老年肿瘤学家在优化泌尿外科肿瘤患者护理中的作用。
Eur Urol Focus. 2017 Oct;3(4-5):385-394. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.10.012. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
3
Organization of the clinical activity of geriatric oncology: report of a SIOG (International Society of Geriatric Oncology) task force.老年肿瘤学临床活动的组织:国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)特别工作组报告
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007 Apr;62(1):62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2006.10.003. Epub 2007 Feb 14.
4
How Can We Improve Education of Breast Surgeons Across Europe?我们如何改善欧洲各地乳腺外科医生的教育?
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017 Jul-Aug;112(4):365-366. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.112.4.365.
5
How do we manage breast cancer in the elderly patients? A survey among members of the British Association of Surgical Oncologists (BASO).我们如何管理老年乳腺癌患者?英国外科肿瘤学家协会(BASO)成员的一项调查。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004 Nov;52(2):135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.08.002.
6
[Geriatric assessment and prognostic scores in older cancer patient: Additional support to the therapeutic decision?].[老年癌症患者的老年评估与预后评分:对治疗决策的额外支持?]
Bull Cancer. 2017 Nov;104(11):946-955. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2017.10.004. Epub 2017 Nov 14.
7
Preoperative geriatric assessment and follow-up of patients older than 75 years undergoing elective surgery for suspected colorectal cancer.75 岁以上择期行手术治疗的疑似结直肠癌患者的术前老年评估和随访。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Sep;10(5):709-715. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
8
Shall we operate? Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients (PACE) can help. A SIOG surgical task force prospective study.我们要进行手术吗?老年癌症患者术前评估(PACE)或许能提供帮助。一项老年肿瘤学会外科特别工作组的前瞻性研究。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008 Feb;65(2):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
9
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the elderly: impact of prognosis, comorbidities, geriatric assessment, and supportive care on clinical practice. An International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) expert position paper.老年弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤:预后、合并症、老年评估及支持治疗对临床实践的影响。国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)专家立场文件
J Geriatr Oncol. 2015 Mar;6(2):141-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2014.11.004. Epub 2014 Dec 7.
10
Nutritional assessment in surgical oncology: An ESSO-EYSAC global survey.外科肿瘤学中的营养评估:ESSO-EYSAC 全球调查。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Nov;46(11):2074-2082. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.08.028. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Curative treatment incorporating subjective decisions on age and frailty is not beneficial for older patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.包含基于年龄和虚弱程度的主观决策的根治性治疗对老年口腔鳞状细胞癌患者并无益处。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0330376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330376. eCollection 2025.
2
Homecare After Cancer Surgery for Older Adults: Derivation and Validation of a Predictive Tool.老年癌症患者术后居家护理:预测工具的推导与验证
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17824-6.
3
A Predictive Tool for Ability to Remain at Home After Cancer Surgery in Older Adults.
一种预测老年人癌症手术后居家能力的工具。
JAMA Surg. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1888.
4
Predicting loss of independence among geriatric patients following gastrointestinal surgery.预测老年患者胃肠道手术后生活自理能力的丧失情况。
Patient Saf Surg. 2025 Jan 9;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13037-024-00424-w.
5
Comprehensive Peri-Operative Risk Assessment and Management of Geriatric Patients.老年患者围手术期综合风险评估与管理
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 27;14(19):2153. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192153.
6
Improving Surgical Care and Outcomes in Older Cancer Patients Through Implementation of a Presurgical Toolkit (OPTI-Surg)-Final Results of a Phase III Cluster Randomized Trial (Alliance A231601CD).通过实施术前工具包(OPTI-Surg)改善老年癌症患者的手术护理和结局——III 期集群随机试验(Alliance A231601CD)的最终结果。
Ann Surg. 2024 Oct 1;280(4):623-632. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006458. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
7
Impact of Frailty and Sarcopenia on Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.虚弱和肌少症对老年胃癌患者根治性胃切除术后短期和长期结局的影响。
World J Surg. 2023 Dec;47(12):3250-3261. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07200-4. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
8
Assessing and managing frailty in emergency laparotomy: a WSES position paper.评估和管理急诊剖腹术中的脆弱性:WSES 立场文件。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Jun 24;18(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00506-7.
9
Timed up and go test and long-term survival in older adults after oncologic surgery.计时起立行走测试与老年肿瘤术后患者的长期生存。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):934. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03585-4.
10
Validating biologic age in selecting elderly patients with pancreatic cancer for surgical resection.验证生物年龄在选择老年胰腺癌患者进行手术切除中的作用。
J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar;127(3):394-404. doi: 10.1002/jso.27121. Epub 2022 Nov 2.