• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按键式手机与触摸屏手机/设备作为微生物污染潜在风险的比较。

Comparison of keypads and touch-screen mobile phones/devices as potential risk for microbial contamination.

作者信息

Koroglu Mehmet, Gunal Selami, Yildiz Fatma, Savas Mehtap, Ozer Ali, Altindis Mustafa

机构信息

Sakarya University School Of Medicine, Sakarya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015 Dec 30;9(12):1308-14. doi: 10.3855/jidc.6171.

DOI:10.3855/jidc.6171
PMID:26719936
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Touch-screen mobile phones/devices (TMPs/Ds) are increasingly used in hospitals. They may act as a mobile reservoir for microbial pathogens. The rates of microbial contamination of TMPs/Ds and keypad mobile phones (KMPs) with respect to different variables including use by healthcare workers (HCWs)/non-HCWs and the demographic characteristics of users were investigated.

METHODOLOGY

A total of 205 mobile phones/devices were screened for microbial contamination: 76 devices belonged to HCWs and 129 devices belonged to the non-HCW group. By rubbing swabs to front screen, back, keypad, and metallic surfaces of devices, 444 samples were collected.

RESULTS

Of 205 mobile phones/devices, 143 (97.9%) of the TMPs/Ds and 58 (98.3%) of the KMPs were positive for microbial contamination, and there were no significant differences in contamination rates between these groups, although TMPs/Ds had significantly higher microbial load than KMPs (p <0.05). The significant difference in this analysis was attributable to the screen size of mobile phones ≥ 5". Microbial contamination rates increased significantly as phone size increased (p <0.05). Higher numbers of coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) were isolated from KMPs than TMPs/Ds (p = 0.049). The incidence of Enterococcus spp. was higher on the KMPs of HCWs, and methicillin resistant CNS was higher from the TMPs/Ds of non-HCWs (p <0.05). Isolation of CNS, Streptococcus spp. and Escherichia coli was higher from the TMPs/Ds of HCWs (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference between TMP/Ds and KMPs in terms of microbial contamination, but TMP/Ds harboured more colonies and total microbial counts increased with screen size.

摘要

引言

触摸屏移动电话/设备(TMPs/Ds)在医院中的使用越来越广泛。它们可能成为微生物病原体的移动储存库。本研究调查了TMPs/Ds和按键式移动电话(KMPs)在不同变量(包括医护人员/非医护人员的使用情况以及用户的人口统计学特征)方面的微生物污染率。

方法

共筛选了205部移动电话/设备以检测微生物污染情况:其中76部设备属于医护人员,129部设备属于非医护人员组。通过用拭子擦拭设备的正面屏幕、背面、按键和金属表面,共采集了444个样本。

结果

在205部移动电话/设备中,143部(97.9%)的TMPs/Ds和58部(98.3%)的KMPs微生物污染检测呈阳性,尽管TMPs/Ds的微生物载量显著高于KMPs(p<0.05),但两组之间的污染率无显著差异。该分析中的显著差异归因于屏幕尺寸≥5英寸的移动电话。随着手机尺寸的增加,微生物污染率显著上升(p<0.05)。从KMPs中分离出的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)数量高于TMPs/Ds(p = 0.049)。医护人员的KMPs上肠球菌属的发生率较高,而非医护人员的TMPs/Ds上耐甲氧西林CNS的发生率较高(p<0.05)。从医护人员的TMPs/Ds中分离出CNS、链球菌属和大肠杆菌的比例更高(p<0.05)。

结论

我们发现TMPs/Ds和KMPs在微生物污染方面没有显著差异,但TMPs/Ds含有更多菌落,且总微生物数量随屏幕尺寸增加而增加。

相似文献

1
Comparison of keypads and touch-screen mobile phones/devices as potential risk for microbial contamination.按键式手机与触摸屏手机/设备作为微生物污染潜在风险的比较。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015 Dec 30;9(12):1308-14. doi: 10.3855/jidc.6171.
2
Are we aware how contaminated our mobile phones with nosocomial pathogens?我们是否意识到我们的手机被医院病原体污染到了何种程度?
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2009 Mar 6;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-8-7.
3
Nosocomial pathogens associated with the mobile phones of healthcare workers in a hospital in Anyigba, Kogi state, Nigeria.尼日利亚科吉州安伊格巴一家医院中与医护人员手机相关的医院病原体。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2014 Jun;4(2):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jegh.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
4
Healthcare workers mobile phone usage: A potential risk for viral contamination. Surveillance pilot study.医护人员手机使用:病毒污染的潜在风险。监测试点研究。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2016;48(6):432-5. doi: 10.3109/23744235.2015.1133926. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
5
Identification of microorganisms on mobile phones of intensive care unit health care workers and medical students in the tertiary hospital.三级医院重症监护病房医护人员和医学生手机上微生物的鉴定
Med Glas (Zenica). 2017 Feb 1;14(1):85-90. doi: 10.17392/878-16.
6
Health care workers' mobile phones: a potential cause of microbial cross-contamination between hospitals and community.医护人员的手机:医院与社区之间微生物交叉污染的潜在原因。
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012;9(9):538-42. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2012.697419.
7
Microbial contamination data of keypad and touch screen of cell phones among hospital and non-hospital staffs - A case study: Iran.医院和非医院工作人员手机键盘及触摸屏的微生物污染数据——一项案例研究:伊朗
Data Brief. 2018 Jul 27;20:80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.07.041. eCollection 2018 Oct.
8
Mobile Phone: A Possible Vector of Bacterial Transmission in Hospital Setting.手机:医院环境中细菌传播的一种可能载体。
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2017;15(59):217-221.
9
Mobile phone technology and hospitalized patients: a cross-sectional surveillance study of bacterial colonization, and patient opinions and behaviours.手机技术与住院患者:细菌定植的横断面监测研究,以及患者的意见和行为。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Jun;17(6):830-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03493.x. Epub 2011 May 26.
10
Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria on Healthcare Workers' Mobile Phones: Evidence from Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴提库尔安贝萨专科医院医护人员手机上产超广谱β-内酰胺酶革兰氏阴性菌:证据
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 26;14:283-291. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S291876. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended spectrum betalactamase and carbapenemase producing gram negative bacteria from mobile phones of healthcare workers at Debre Berhan Hospital, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚德布雷伯哈恩医院医护人员手机上产超广谱β-内酰胺酶和碳青霉烯酶的革兰氏阴性菌
Sci Rep. 2025 May 26;15(1):18427. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03191-5.
2
Effectiveness of Ultraviolet Radiation and Disinfectant Wipes in Reducing the Microbial Contamination of Mobile Phones in a Tertiary Care Hospital.紫外线辐射和消毒湿巾对降低三级医院手机微生物污染的效果
Cureus. 2024 Jul 17;16(7):e64782. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64782. eCollection 2024 Jul.
3
Bacterial contamination of healthcare workers' mobile phones in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
非洲医护人员手机的细菌污染:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Trop Med Health. 2023 Oct 5;51(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s41182-023-00547-3.
4
Bacterial Contamination of Healthcare Students' Mobile Phones: Impact of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), Users' Demographics and Device Characteristics on Bacterial Load.医护专业学生手机的细菌污染:比吸收率(SAR)、用户人口统计学特征及设备特性对细菌载量的影响
Life (Basel). 2023 Jun 8;13(6):1349. doi: 10.3390/life13061349.
5
Potentially Virulent Multi-Drug Resistant Isolated from Inanimate Surface in a Medical University: as an Alternative for Bacterial Virulence Determination.从某医科大学无生命表面分离出的潜在毒力多重耐药菌:作为细菌毒力测定的替代方法
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jan 11;13(2):279. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13020279.
6
Fungal contamination of medical students' mobile phones from the University of Belgrade, Serbia: a cross-sectional study.塞尔维亚贝尔格莱德大学医学生手机真菌污染:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 7;12(1):16852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21118-2.
7
Bacterial Colonization on Healthcare Workers' Mobile Phones and Hands in Municipal Hospitals of Chongqing, China: Cross-contamination and Associated Factors.中国重庆市市级医院医护人员手机和手上的细菌定植情况:交叉污染及相关因素。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2022 Dec;12(4):390-399. doi: 10.1007/s44197-022-00057-1. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
8
Review of microbial touchscreen contamination for the determination of reasonable ultraviolet disinfection doses.用于确定合理紫外线消毒剂量的微生物触摸屏污染综述。
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2021 Nov 2;16:Doc30. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000401. eCollection 2021.
9
Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria on Healthcare Workers' Mobile Phones: Evidence from Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴提库尔安贝萨专科医院医护人员手机上产超广谱β-内酰胺酶革兰氏阴性菌:证据
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Jan 26;14:283-291. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S291876. eCollection 2021.
10
Forensic Applications of Microbiomics: A Review.微生物组学的法医学应用:综述
Front Microbiol. 2021 Jan 13;11:608101. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.608101. eCollection 2020.