Patel Mitesh, Arshad Qadeer, Roberts Richard Edward, Ahmad Hena, Bronstein Adolfo M
*Department of Neuro-otology, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London †School of Health, Sports and Biosciences, University of East London, London, U.K.
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Feb;37(2):179-84. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000949.
As the anterior and posterior semicircular canals are vital to the regulation of gaze stability, particularly during locomotion or vehicular travel, we tested whether the high-velocity vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) of the three ipsilesional semicircular canals elicited by the modified Head Impulse Test would correlate with subjective dizziness or vertigo scores after vestibular neuritis (VN).
Recovery after acute VN varies with around half reporting persistent symptoms long after the acute episode. However, an unanswered question is whether chronic symptoms are associated with impairment of the high-velocity VOR of the anterior or posterior canals.
Twenty patients who had experienced an acute episode of VN at least 3 months earlier were included in this study. Participants were assessed with the video head impulse test (vHIT) of all six canals, bithermal caloric irrigation, the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and the Vertigo Symptoms Scale short-form (VSS).
Of these 20 patients, 12 thought that they had recovered from the initial episode whereas 8 did not and reported elevated DHI and VSS scores. However, we found no correlation between DHI or VSS scores and the ipsilesional single or combined vHIT gain, vHIT gain asymmetry orcaloric paresis. The high-velocity VOR was not different between patients who thought they had recovered and patients who thought they had not.
Our findings suggest that chronic symptoms of dizziness after VN are not associated with the high-velocity VOR of the single or combined ipsilesional horizontal, anterior, or posterior semicircular canals.
由于前、后半规管对注视稳定性的调节至关重要,尤其是在运动或乘车旅行期间,我们测试了改良头部脉冲试验诱发的同侧三个半规管的高速前庭眼反射(VOR)是否与前庭神经炎(VN)后的主观头晕或眩晕评分相关。
急性VN后的恢复情况各不相同,约有一半的患者在急性发作后很长时间仍报告有持续症状。然而,一个尚未解决的问题是,慢性症状是否与前半规管或后半规管的高速VOR受损有关。
本研究纳入了至少在3个月前经历过急性VN发作的20名患者。对参与者进行了所有六个半规管的视频头部脉冲试验(vHIT)、冷热交替灌洗、头晕残障量表(DHI)和眩晕症状简表(VSS)评估。
在这20名患者中,12人认为他们已从最初发作中恢复,而8人则没有,并报告DHI和VSS评分升高。然而,我们发现DHI或VSS评分与同侧单个或联合vHIT增益、vHIT增益不对称或冷热轻瘫之间没有相关性。认为自己已恢复的患者和认为自己未恢复的患者之间的高速VOR没有差异。
我们的研究结果表明,VN后头晕的慢性症状与同侧单个或联合水平、前或后半规管的高速VOR无关。