Patient Decision Aids for Discouraging Low-Value Health Care Procedures: Null Findings and Lessons Learned.
作者信息
Prochaska Judith J, Sanders-Jackson Ashley
机构信息
Stanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Department of Advertising and Public Relations, College of Communication Arts and Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
出版信息
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jan;176(1):41-2. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7347.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Patient Decision Aids for Discouraging Low-Value Health Care Procedures: Null Findings and Lessons Learned.用于劝阻低价值医疗程序的患者决策辅助工具：无效结果与经验教训。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jan;176(1):41-2. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7347.
2
A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Alternate Formats for Presenting Benefits and Harms Information for Low-Value Screening Services: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一种用于呈现低价值筛查服务的获益和危害信息的不同呈现格式的对照效果试验：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jan;176(1):31-41. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7339.
3
Capsule commentary on Tomko et al., A comparison of web- versus print-based decision AIDS for prostate cancer screening: participants' evaluation and utilization.对汤姆科等人的胶囊评论，《基于网络与纸质的前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具比较：参与者的评估与使用》
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3039-y.
4
Screening for cancer: lessons learned from the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.癌症筛查：从前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌筛查试验中吸取的教训。
Eur Urol. 2015 Oct;68(4):545-6. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 8.
5
Decision aids: when 'nudging' patients to make a particular choice is more ethical than balanced, nondirective content.决策辅助工具：当“推动”患者做出特定选择比平衡、非直接的内容更符合伦理时。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):303-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0761.
6
What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?当前癌症筛查决策辅助工具的不足之处是什么？
CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 May;63(3):193-214. doi: 10.3322/caac.21180. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
7
Mediated decision support in prostate cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial of decision counseling.前列腺癌筛查中的中介决策支持：决策咨询的随机对照试验。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 May;83(2):240-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.011. Epub 2010 Jul 8.
8
Colorectal cancer screening in the elderly: the need for informed decision making.老年人的结直肠癌筛查：知情决策的必要性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Dec;24(12):1336-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1121-7.
9
An effort to spread decision aids in five California primary care practices yielded low distribution, highlighting hurdles.在加利福尼亚州的五家初级保健诊所推广决策辅助工具的努力收效甚微，凸显了其中的障碍。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb;32(2):311-20. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1070.
10
Strategies for distributing cancer screening decision aids in primary care.在初级保健中分发癌症筛查决策辅助工具的策略。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Feb;78(2):166-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.013. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
本文引用的文献
1
A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Alternate Formats for Presenting Benefits and Harms Information for Low-Value Screening Services: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一种用于呈现低价值筛查服务的获益和危害信息的不同呈现格式的对照效果试验：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jan;176(1):31-41. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7339.
2
A new initiative on precision medicine.一项关于精准医学的新倡议。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):793-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1500523. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
3
National health spending in 2013: growth slows, remains in step with the overall economy.2013年国家卫生支出：增长放缓，仍与整体经济同步。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Jan;34(1):150-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1107. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
4
Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions.量身定制重要吗？针对印刷品健康行为改变干预措施的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2007 Jul;133(4):673-93. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673.
5
Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions.改变医疗服务提供者的行为：干预措施系统评价概述
Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8 Suppl 2):II2-45.
6
The cognitive impact of past behavior: influences on beliefs, attitudes, and future behavioral decisions.过去行为的认知影响：对信念、态度及未来行为决策的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jul;79(1):5-22. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.1.5.
Zotero 插件