Capsule commentary on Tomko et al., A comparison of web- versus print-based decision AIDS for prostate cancer screening: participants' evaluation and utilization.
作者信息
Kessler Elizabeth
机构信息
Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, University of Colorado Cancer Center, MS 8117, 12801 E 17th Ave, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA,
出版信息
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3039-y.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Capsule commentary on Tomko et al., A comparison of web- versus print-based decision AIDS for prostate cancer screening: participants' evaluation and utilization.对汤姆科等人的胶囊评论，《基于网络与纸质的前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具比较：参与者的评估与使用》
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3039-y.
2
A comparison of web-based versus print-based decision AIDS for prostate cancer screening: participants' evaluation and utilization.基于网络与基于印刷品的前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的比较：参与者的评估与使用情况
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):33-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2994-7. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
3
Decision making in prostate cancer screening using decision aids vs usual care: a randomized clinical trial.基于决策辅助工具与常规护理的前列腺癌筛查决策：一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14;173(18):1704-12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9253.
4
Re: A Comparison of Web-Based versus Print-Based Decision Aids for Prostate Cancer Screening: Participants' Evaluation and Utilization.关于：基于网络与基于印刷品的前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的比较：参与者的评估与使用情况
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):154. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.106. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
5
Patient Decision Aids for Discouraging Low-Value Health Care Procedures: Null Findings and Lessons Learned.用于劝阻低价值医疗程序的患者决策辅助工具：无效结果与经验教训。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jan;176(1):41-2. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7347.
6
Web-Based Versus Usual Care and Other Formats of Decision Aids to Support Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.基于网络的决策辅助工具与常规护理及其他形式的决策辅助工具对前列腺癌筛查决策的支持：系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 26;20(6):e228. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9070.
7
Deciding on PSA-screening - Quality of current consumer information on the Internet.前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）筛查决策 - 互联网上当前消费者信息的质量。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Nov;46(17):3073-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.011.
8
Translation and cultural adaptation of a prostate cancer screening decision aid: a qualitative study in Portugal.前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的翻译和文化调适：葡萄牙的一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 25;10(3):e034384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034384.
9
Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making.关于前列腺癌筛查的患者教育及参与决策
Ann Fam Med. 2007 Mar-Apr;5(2):112-9. doi: 10.1370/afm.623.
10
A simple schema for informed decision making about prostate cancer screening.一个用于前列腺癌筛查知情决策的简单模式。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Sep 16;161(6):441-2. doi: 10.7326/M14-0151.
引用本文的文献
1
What's new in screening in 2015?2015年筛查领域有哪些新进展？
Curr Opin Urol. 2016 Sep;26(5):447-58. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000321.
本文引用的文献
1
A comparison of web-based versus print-based decision AIDS for prostate cancer screening: participants' evaluation and utilization.基于网络与基于印刷品的前列腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的比较：参与者的评估与使用情况
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jan;30(1):33-42. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2994-7. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
2
Summaries for patients. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.患者摘要。前列腺癌筛查：美国预防服务工作组建议声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17;157(2):I-44. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00464.
3
Effect of uniform consensus recommendations for PCa screening in older population: differential effects and perceptions of healthcare providers and patients.老年人群前列腺癌筛查统一共识建议的效果：医疗服务提供者和患者的不同影响及认知
Urology. 2009 Mar;73(3):603-8; discussion 608-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.518. Epub 2009 Jan 1.
4
Social ecological predictors of prostate-specific antigen blood test and digital rectal examination in black American men.美国黑人男性前列腺特异性抗原血液检测和直肠指检的社会生态预测因素
J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Apr;98(4):492-504.
5
Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions.复杂干预随机对照试验中的过程评估
BMJ. 2006 Feb 18;332(7538):413-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413.
Zotero 插件