• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
What Do People Believe About Memory? Implications for the Science and Pseudoscience of Clinical Practice.人们对记忆有哪些看法?对临床实践科学与伪科学的启示。
Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;60(12):541-7. doi: 10.1177/070674371506001204.
2
Make-believe memories.虚构的记忆。
Am Psychol. 2003 Nov;58(11):867-873. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.11.867.
3
Teaching psychology students to change (or correct) controversial beliefs about memory works.教导心理学专业的学生改变(或纠正)关于记忆的有争议的观念是有效的。
Memory. 2022 Jul;30(6):753-762. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1874994. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
4
Suggestibility and repressed memories of abuse: a survey of psychotherapists' beliefs.受暗示性与被压抑的虐待记忆:心理治疗师信念调查
Am J Clin Hypn. 1994 Jan;36(3):163-71; discussion 172-87. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1994.10403066.
5
Laypeople's beliefs about memory: disentangling the effects of age and time.非专业人士对记忆的认知:年龄和时间效应的分解。
Memory. 2020 May;28(5):589-597. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1733023. Epub 2020 May 7.
6
Ordered questions bias eyewitnesses and jurors.诱导性问题会影响目击者和陪审员。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2016 Apr;23(2):601-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0933-1.
7
Are the "memory wars" over? A scientist-practitioner gap in beliefs about repressed memory.“记忆之战”结束了吗?关于压抑记忆的信念,科学家-实践者之间存在差距。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):519-30. doi: 10.1177/0956797613510718. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
8
Assumptions of students and psychotherapists about memory.
Psychol Rep. 1998 Jun;82(3 Pt 1):763-70. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1998.82.3.763.
9
The comparison of disposal attitudes towards forensic psychiatric patients among police officers, psychiatrists and community members in China.中国警察、精神科医生和社区成员对法医精神病患者处置态度的比较。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2013 Nov;20(8):986-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
10
Judges and lawyers' beliefs in repression and dissociative amnesia may imperil justice: further guidance required.法官和律师对压抑和分离性遗忘的信念可能危及司法公正:需要进一步的指导。
Memory. 2024 Sep;32(8):1083-1099. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2024.2383311. Epub 2024 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
False memories in forensic psychology: do cognition and brain activity tell the same story?法医心理学中的错误记忆:认知与大脑活动是否讲述相同的故事?
Front Psychol. 2024 May 16;15:1327196. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1327196. eCollection 2024.
2
Tilting at Windmills: Why Attacks on Repression Are Misguided.《攻击压制:为何这些行为是错误的》
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):443-453. doi: 10.1177/1745691620927674. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
The Return of the Repressed: The Persistent and Problematic Claims of Long-Forgotten Trauma.被压抑的回归:被长久遗忘的创伤的持续而棘手的主张。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;14(6):1072-1095. doi: 10.1177/1745691619862306. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
4
Testing Claims of Crime-Related Amnesia.检验与犯罪相关的失忆症的说法。
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 21;9:617. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00617. eCollection 2018.
5
Introduction to Special Section on Pseudoscience in Psychiatry.精神医学中的伪科学专题介绍。
Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;60(12):531-3. doi: 10.1177/070674371506001202.

本文引用的文献

1
25 Years of Eyewitness Science……Finally Pays Off.25年的目击科学……终于有了回报。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;8(5):556-7. doi: 10.1177/1745691613500995.
2
Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm.造成伤害的心理治疗。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;2(1):53-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00029.x.
3
A ten-year follow-up of a study of memory for the attack of September 11, 2001: Flashbulb memories and memories for flashbulb events.一项对 2001 年 9 月 11 日袭击事件记忆的十年追踪研究:闪回记忆和闪回事件记忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Jun;144(3):604-23. doi: 10.1037/xge0000055. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
The fallibility of memory in judicial processes: lessons from the past and their modern consequences.司法程序中记忆的不可靠性:过去的教训及其现代影响。
Memory. 2015;23(5):633-56. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1010709. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
5
Constructing rich false memories of committing crime.构建丰富的犯罪行为虚假记忆
Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;26(3):291-301. doi: 10.1177/0956797614562862.
6
Are the "memory wars" over? A scientist-practitioner gap in beliefs about repressed memory.“记忆之战”结束了吗?关于压抑记忆的信念,科学家-实践者之间存在差距。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Feb;25(2):519-30. doi: 10.1177/0956797613510718. Epub 2013 Dec 13.
7
Common (mis)beliefs about memory: a replication and comparison of telephone and Mechanical Turk survey methods.关于记忆的常见(误解)观点:电话和 Mechanical Turk 调查方法的复制与比较。
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e51876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051876. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
8
False memories for missing aspects of traumatic events.对创伤性事件缺失部分的错误记忆。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Nov;141(3):322-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.08.005. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
9
Memory lessons from the courtroom: Reflections on being a memory expert on the witness stand.法庭上的记忆课:关于成为证人席上的记忆专家的思考。
Memory. 2013 Jul;21(5):576-583. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2012.725735. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
10
What people believe about how memory works: a representative survey of the U.S. population.人们对记忆运作方式的看法:对美国人口的代表性调查。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22757. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022757. Epub 2011 Aug 3.

人们对记忆有哪些看法?对临床实践科学与伪科学的启示。

What Do People Believe About Memory? Implications for the Science and Pseudoscience of Clinical Practice.

作者信息

Lynn Steven Jay, Evans James, Laurence Jean-Roch, Lilienfeld Scott O

机构信息

Professor, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York.

Graduate Research Associate, Binghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, New York.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 2015 Dec;60(12):541-7. doi: 10.1177/070674371506001204.

DOI:10.1177/070674371506001204
PMID:26720822
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4679162/
Abstract

We examine the evidence concerning what people believe about memory. We focus on beliefs regarding the permanence of memory and whether memory can be repressed and accurately recovered. We consider beliefs about memory among the undergraduate and general population, mental health professionals, judges, jurors, and law enforcement officers to provide a broad canvass that extends to the forensic arena, as well as to psychiatry, psychology, and allied disciplines. We discuss the implications of these beliefs for the education of the general public and mental health professionals regarding the science and pseudoscience of memory and the use of suggestive procedures in psychotherapy.

摘要

我们审视了有关人们对记忆的看法的证据。我们关注的是有关记忆持久性以及记忆是否会被压抑并准确恢复的看法。我们考量了本科生和普通大众、心理健康专业人士、法官、陪审员以及执法人员对记忆的看法,以进行广泛的探讨,其范围涵盖了法医领域,以及精神病学、心理学和相关学科。我们讨论了这些看法对于普通公众和心理健康专业人士在记忆科学与伪科学以及心理治疗中暗示性程序使用方面教育的意义。