Jung Junhee, Kim Sunbo, Park Jinjoo, Shin Chonghoon, Pham Duy Phong, Kim Jiwoong, Chung Sungyoun, Lee Youngseok, Yi Junsin
J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2015 Oct;15(10):7760-4. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2015.11207.
This article mainly discusses the difference between p-i-n and n-i-p type solar cells. Their structural difference has an effect on cell performance, such as open circuit voltage and fill factor. Although the deposition conditions are the same for both p-i-n and n-i-p cases, the substrate layers for depositing p-type microcrystalline silicon layers differ. In n-i-p cells, the substrate layer is p-type amorphous silicon oxide layer; whereas, in p-i-n cells, the substrate layer is ZnO:Al. The interfacial change leads to a 12% difference in the crystallinity of the p-type microcrystalline silicon layers. When the p-type microcrystalline silicon layer's crystallinity was not sufficient to activate an internal electric field, the open circuit voltage and fill factor decreased 0.075 V and 7.36%, respectively. We analyzed this problem by comparing the Raman spectra, electrical conductivity, activation energy and solar cell performance. By adjusting the thickness of the p-type microcrystalline silicon layer, we increased the open circuit voltage of the n-i-p cell from 0.835 to 0.91 V.
本文主要讨论了p-i-n型和n-i-p型太阳能电池之间的差异。它们的结构差异会对电池性能产生影响,例如开路电压和填充因子。尽管p-i-n和n-i-p两种情况下的沉积条件相同,但用于沉积p型微晶硅层的衬底层有所不同。在n-i-p电池中,衬底层是p型非晶硅氧化物层;而在p-i-n电池中,衬底层是ZnO:Al。这种界面变化导致p型微晶硅层的结晶度出现12%的差异。当p型微晶硅层的结晶度不足以激活内部电场时,开路电压和填充因子分别下降了0.075 V和7.36%。我们通过比较拉曼光谱、电导率、激活能和太阳能电池性能来分析这个问题。通过调整p型微晶硅层的厚度,我们将n-i-p电池的开路电压从0.835 V提高到了0.91 V。