• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

异常声音会产生干扰,无论这些声音的信息价值如何。

Deviant sounds yield distraction irrespective of the sounds' informational value.

作者信息

Parmentier Fabrice B R

机构信息

University of the Balearic Islands.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):837-46. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000195. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000195
PMID:26727016
Abstract

Oddball studies show that rare and unexpected changes in an otherwise repetitive or structured sequence of task-irrelevant sounds (deviant sounds among standard sounds) ineluctably break through attentional filters and yield longer response times in an ongoing task. Although this deviance distraction effect has generally been thought of as an involuntary and adaptive phenomenon, recent studies questioned this view by reporting that deviance distraction is observed when sounds predict the occurrence of a target stimulus (informative sounds) but that it disappears when sounds do not convey this information (uninformative sounds). Here, I challenge this conclusion and suggest that the apparent absence of deviance distraction with uninformative sounds results in fact from 2 opposite effects: deviance distraction when the previous trial involved a target and required responding, and a speeding up of responses by deviant sound following trials involving no target and requiring the withholding of responses. Data from a new experiment, new analyses of the data from 3 earlier studies, and the modeling of these data all converge in suggesting the existence of deviance distraction impervious to the sounds' informational value. These results undermine the proposition of a late top-down control mechanism gating behavioral distraction as a function of the sounds' informative value. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

异常刺激研究表明,在原本重复或结构化的与任务无关的声音序列(标准声音中的异常声音)中,罕见且意外的变化不可避免地会突破注意力过滤器,并在进行中的任务中产生更长的反应时间。尽管这种异常刺激干扰效应通常被认为是一种非自愿的适应性现象,但最近的研究对这一观点提出了质疑,报告称当声音预测目标刺激(信息性声音)的出现时会观察到异常刺激干扰,但当声音不传达此信息(非信息性声音)时,这种干扰就会消失。在此,我对这一结论提出质疑,并认为非信息性声音表面上不存在异常刺激干扰实际上是由两种相反的效应导致的:在前一次试验涉及目标并需要做出反应时出现异常刺激干扰,而在涉及无目标且需要抑制反应的试验后,异常声音会加快反应速度。一项新实验的数据、对三项早期研究数据的新分析以及这些数据的建模都一致表明存在不受声音信息价值影响的异常刺激干扰。这些结果削弱了一种晚期自上而下控制机制的观点,该机制根据声音的信息价值对行为干扰进行门控。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》)

相似文献

1
Deviant sounds yield distraction irrespective of the sounds' informational value.异常声音会产生干扰,无论这些声音的信息价值如何。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):837-46. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000195. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
2
The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: the role of event information.行为分心的信息约束:意外声音的作用——事件信息。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1461-8. doi: 10.1037/a0028149. Epub 2012 May 7.
3
Behavioral distraction by auditory deviance is mediated by the sound's informational value. Evidence from an auditory discrimination task.听觉偏差引起的行为分心由声音的信息价值介导。来自听觉辨别任务的证据。
Exp Psychol. 2013;60(4):260-8. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000196.
4
Behavioral distraction by auditory novelty is not only about novelty: the role of the distracter's informational value.听觉新颖性引起的行为分心不仅与新颖性有关:分心物的信息价值的作用。
Cognition. 2010 Jun;115(3):504-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.002. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
5
Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sounds.对异常声音的非自愿分心的认知控制。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Sep;39(5):1635-41. doi: 10.1037/a0032421. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
6
The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.异常听觉刺激导致行为分心的认知决定因素:综述
Psychol Res. 2014;78(3):321-38. doi: 10.1007/s00426-013-0534-4. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
7
Sadness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.悲伤会增加对听觉偏差刺激的分心。
Emotion. 2014 Feb;14(1):203-13. doi: 10.1037/a0034289. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
8
Effects of the short-term learned significance of task-irrelevant sounds on involuntary attention in children and adults.与任务无关声音的短期习得意义对儿童和成人非自愿注意的影响。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Oct;98(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
9
The semantic aftermath of distraction by deviant sounds: Crosstalk interference is mediated by the predictability of semantic congruency.异常声音干扰的语义后果:串扰干扰由语义一致性的可预测性介导。
Brain Res. 2015 Nov 11;1626:247-57. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.034. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
10
Happiness increases distraction by auditory deviant stimuli.快乐会增加对听觉异常刺激的注意力分散。
Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):419-33. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12148. Epub 2015 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Distraction by unexpected sounds: comparing response repetition and response switching.意外声音引起的注意力分散:比较反应重复和反应切换。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 2;15:1451008. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1451008. eCollection 2024.
2
Auditory context-dependent distraction by unexpected visual stimuli.意外视觉刺激引起的听觉情境依赖型分心。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Dec;31(6):2791-2800. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02527-y. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
Distraction by violation of sensory predictions: Functional distinction between deviant sounds and unexpected silences.
感官预测违背引起的分心:异常声音和意外静音之间的功能区别。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0274188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274188. eCollection 2022.
4
Aging Increases Cross-Modal Distraction by Unexpected Sounds: Controlling for Response Speed.衰老会因意外声音增加跨模态干扰:对反应速度进行控制。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Sep 15;13:733388. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.733388. eCollection 2021.
5
Distraction by auditory novelty during reading: Evidence for disruption in saccade planning, but not saccade execution.阅读时听觉新奇性分散注意力:在扫视计划中存在干扰,但扫视执行不受影响的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2021 May;74(5):826-842. doi: 10.1177/1747021820982267. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Distraction by deviant sounds: disgusting and neutral words capture attention to the same extent.分散注意力的异常声音:令人厌恶和中性的词语吸引注意力的程度相同。
Psychol Res. 2020 Oct;84(7):1801-1814. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01192-4. Epub 2019 May 3.
7
Distraction by deviant sounds during reading: An eye-movement study.阅读过程中异常声音的干扰:一项眼动研究。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Jul;72(7):1863-1875. doi: 10.1177/1747021818820816. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
8
Attentional bias on motor control: is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting?注意对运动控制的偏向:运动抑制是否受注意重新定向的影响?
Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):276-284. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0998-3. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
9
Food words distract the hungry: Evidence of involuntary semantic processing of task-irrelevant but biologically-relevant unexpected auditory words.食物相关词汇会分散饥饿者的注意力:无关但与生物相关的意外听觉词汇的非自愿语义加工证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 4;13(1):e0190644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190644. eCollection 2018.
10
Establishing a Right Frontal Beta Signature for Stopping Action in Scalp EEG: Implications for Testing Inhibitory Control in Other Task Contexts.在头皮 EEG 中建立右额β特征以停止动作:对在其他任务情境下测试抑制控制的启示。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Jan;30(1):107-118. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01183. Epub 2017 Sep 7.