• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初步印象:它们是什么,它们不是什么,以及它们如何影响结构化访谈结果。

Initial impressions: What they are, what they are not, and how they influence structured interview outcomes.

机构信息

Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology.

Mays Business School, Texas A&M University.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2016 May;101(5):625-38. doi: 10.1037/apl0000077. Epub 2016 Jan 4.

DOI:10.1037/apl0000077
PMID:26727208
Abstract

Nearly all employment interviews, even those considered highly structured, begin with a brief meet-and-greet conversation typically coalescing around non-job-related topics (i.e., rapport building). Although applicants and interviewers often view rapport building as an essential, value-adding component of the interview, it may contaminate interviewers' evaluations of answers to subsequently asked structured questions (Levashina, Hartwell, Morgeson, & Campion, 2014). Yet research has not determined the extent to which initial impressions developed during rapport building influence subsequent interviewer ratings through job-related interview content versus non-job-related content; whether these effects extend beyond more commonly examined image-related factors that can bias interviewers (i.e., self-presentation tactics); or how these effects are temporally bound when influencing interviewer ratings during the formal structured interview question-and-answer process. Addressing these questions, we integrate interview research with the extant social psychology literature to clarify rapport building's unique effects in the employment interview. In contrast to prior assumptions, findings based on 163 mock interviews suggest that a significant portion of initial impressions' influence overlaps with job-related interview content and, importantly, that these effects are distinct from other image-related constructs. Finally, initial impressions are found to more strongly relate to interviewer evaluations of applicant responses earlier rather than later in the structured interview. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

几乎所有的面试,即使被认为是高度结构化的面试,也都是从简短的见面和问候开始,通常围绕着与工作无关的话题(即建立融洽关系)。虽然应聘者和面试官通常认为建立融洽关系是面试的一个重要的、有附加值的组成部分,但它可能会污染面试官对随后问到的结构化问题的回答的评价(Levashina、Hartwell、Morgeson 和 Campion,2014)。然而,研究还没有确定在多大程度上,建立融洽关系过程中产生的最初印象会通过与工作相关的面试内容与与工作无关的内容影响后续面试官的评分;这些影响是否超出了更常见的、会影响面试官的与形象相关的因素(即自我呈现策略);或者这些影响在影响正式结构化面试问答过程中的面试官评分时,在时间上是如何受限的。为了解决这些问题,我们将面试研究与现有的社会心理学文献相结合,以澄清在就业面试中建立融洽关系的独特影响。与之前的假设相反,基于 163 次模拟面试的发现表明,初始印象的影响有相当一部分与与工作相关的面试内容重叠,重要的是,这些影响与其他与形象相关的结构不同。最后,研究发现,初始印象与面试官对申请人回答的评价的相关性在结构化面试的早期比后期更强。

相似文献

1
Initial impressions: What they are, what they are not, and how they influence structured interview outcomes.初步印象:它们是什么,它们不是什么,以及它们如何影响结构化访谈结果。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 May;101(5):625-38. doi: 10.1037/apl0000077. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
2
Initial evaluations in the interview: relationships with subsequent interviewer evaluations and employment offers.面谈中的初步评估:与后续面试官评估和工作机会的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Nov;95(6):1163-72. doi: 10.1037/a0019918.
3
Managing and creating an image in the interview: the role of interviewee initial impressions.在面试中管理和塑造形象:受访者第一印象的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Nov;96(6):1275-88. doi: 10.1037/a0024005. Epub 2011 May 30.
4
How and why do interviewers try to make impressions on applicants? A qualitative study.面试官如何以及为何试图给应聘者留下印象?一项定性研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Mar;101(3):313-332. doi: 10.1037/apl0000046. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
5
Disclose or not? Effect of impression management tactics on hireability of persons with epilepsy.披露与否?印象管理策略对癫痫患者就业能力的影响。
Epilepsia. 2017 Jan;58(1):128-136. doi: 10.1111/epi.13619. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation.通过结构化求职面试评估人格:与构念相关的效度及对反应性夸大的易感性。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 May;90(3):536-52. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.536.
7
The goal of forming accurate impressions during social interactions: attenuating the impact of negative expectancies.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Mar;56(3):374-86. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.56.3.374.
8
Target complicity in the confirmation and disconfirmation of erroneous perceiver expectations: immediate and longer-term implications.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Nov;73(5):974-91. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.5.974.
9
Field study investigation of applicant use of influence tactics in a selection interview.申请人在选拔面试中运用影响策略的实地研究调查。
J Psychol. 2002 Jul;136(4):383-98. doi: 10.1080/00223980209604165.
10
Selling and Smooth-Talking: Effects of Interviewer Impression Management from a Signaling Perspective.推销与花言巧语:从信号角度看面试官印象管理的影响
Front Psychol. 2017 May 29;8:740. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00740. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Do Applicants (Dis)Like Selection Methods? The Role of Stimulus and Response Format for Need Satisfaction.为什么求职者喜欢(或不喜欢)选拔方法?刺激因素和反应形式对需求满足的作用。
J Bus Psychol. 2025;40(4):995-1016. doi: 10.1007/s10869-024-10002-7. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
2
How Long Does it Last? The Enduring Benefits of Neurodiversity Training and Diagnostic Disclosure on Hiring Outcomes for Adults with ASD.它能持续多久?神经多样性培训及诊断信息披露对自闭症谱系障碍成年人招聘结果的持久益处。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06751-w.
3
Barriers to Employment: Raters' Perceptions of Male Autistic and Non-Autistic Candidates During a Simulated Job Interview and the Impact of Diagnostic Disclosure.
就业障碍:在模拟求职面试中评估者对患有自闭症和未患自闭症的男性求职者的看法以及诊断信息披露的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2021 Dec 1;3(4):300-309. doi: 10.1089/aut.2020.0075. Epub 2021 Dec 7.
4
Who will go the extra mile? Selecting organizational citizens with a personality-based structured job interview.谁会付出额外的努力?通过基于个性的结构化求职面试来选拔组织公民行为者。
J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(6):985-1007. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09716-1. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Mapping social exclusion in STEM to men's implicit bias and women's career costs.绘制 STEM 领域的社会排斥现象与男性内隐偏见和女性职业成本之间的关系图。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 5;118(40). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2026308118.
6
Enhancing Personality Assessment in the Selection Context: A Study Protocol on Alternative Measures and an Extended Bandwidth of Criteria.在选拔情境中加强人格评估:关于替代测量方法和扩展标准带宽的研究方案
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 10;12:643690. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643690. eCollection 2021.