Suppr超能文献

谁会付出额外的努力?通过基于个性的结构化求职面试来选拔组织公民行为者。

Who will go the extra mile? Selecting organizational citizens with a personality-based structured job interview.

作者信息

Heimann Anna Luca, Ingold Pia V, Debus Maike E, Kleinmann Martin

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Binzmuehlestrasse 14/Box 12, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.

School of Business, Economics, and Society, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(6):985-1007. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09716-1. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

Abstract

Employees' organizational citizenship behaviors (OCB) are important drivers of organizational effectiveness. Yet, there exist no established tools for selecting employees with a propensity to engage in OCB. Given that personality traits describe typical behavioral tendencies and are established OCB predictors, we propose that personality assessment is a useful approach for selecting employees who are likely to exhibit OCB. To test this proposition, we developed a structured job interview measuring the Big Five traits and then compared this interview to a personality self-report measure to determine which method of personality assessment works best for selecting organizational citizens. Employees ( = 223) from various occupations participated in the structured job interview and completed the personality self-report in a simulated selection setting. We then obtained supervisor ratings of employees' OCB. Results supported the assumption that structured job interviews can be specifically designed to assess the Big Five personality traits and, most importantly, to predict OCB. Interview ratings of specific personality traits differentially predicted different types of OCB (i.e., OCB-compliance, OCB-helping, and OCB-initiative) and explained incremental variance in OCB over and above personality self-reports and verbal cognitive ability. Taken together, these findings expand our knowledge about dispositional predictors of OCBs, personality assessment in selection, and the design of job interviews.

摘要

员工的组织公民行为(OCB)是组织效能的重要驱动因素。然而,目前尚无既定的工具来筛选具有参与OCB倾向的员工。鉴于人格特质描述了典型的行为倾向且是既定的OCB预测指标,我们提出人格评估是筛选可能表现出OCB的员工的一种有用方法。为了验证这一命题,我们开发了一种测量大五人格特质的结构化求职面试,然后将该面试与人格自评量表进行比较,以确定哪种人格评估方法最适合筛选组织公民。来自不同职业的223名员工参与了结构化求职面试,并在模拟选拔环境中完成了人格自评。然后,我们获得了主管对员工OCB的评价。结果支持了这样的假设,即结构化求职面试可以专门设计用于评估大五人格特质,最重要的是,可以预测OCB。特定人格特质的面试评分对不同类型的OCB(即OCB-合规性、OCB-帮助性和OCB-主动性)有不同的预测作用,并且在人格自评和言语认知能力之外,还解释了OCB中额外的方差。综上所述,这些发现扩展了我们对OCB的性格预测指标、选拔中的人格评估以及求职面试设计的认识。

相似文献

1
Who will go the extra mile? Selecting organizational citizens with a personality-based structured job interview.
J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(6):985-1007. doi: 10.1007/s10869-020-09716-1. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
6
The Role of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Gender between Job Satisfaction and Task Performance.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 9;18(18):9499. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189499.
7
Going the extra mile and feeling energized: An enrichment perspective of organizational citizenship behaviors.
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Mar;101(3):379-91. doi: 10.1037/apl0000071. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
9
Personality and citizenship behavior: the mediating role of job satisfaction.
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):945-59. doi: 10.1037/a0013329.
10
Above and beyond, again and again: self-regulation in the aftermath of organizational citizenship behaviors.
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Jan;100(1):40-55. doi: 10.1037/a0036902. Epub 2014 May 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual differences and their measurement: A review of 100 years of research.
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Mar;102(3):254-273. doi: 10.1037/apl0000151. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
2
The effects of predictor method factors on selection outcomes: A modular approach to personnel selection procedures.
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Jan;102(1):43-66. doi: 10.1037/apl0000160. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
3
A multi-rater framework for studying personality: The trait-reputation-identity model.
Psychol Rev. 2016 Oct;123(5):569-91. doi: 10.1037/rev0000035. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
A Heuristic Method for Estimating the Relative Weight of Predictor Variables in Multiple Regression.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2000 Jan 1;35(1):1-19. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1.
5
Initial impressions: What they are, what they are not, and how they influence structured interview outcomes.
J Appl Psychol. 2016 May;101(5):625-38. doi: 10.1037/apl0000077. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
Correlational effect size benchmarks.
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Mar;100(2):431-49. doi: 10.1037/a0038047. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
7
A meta-analysis of the relationship between general mental ability and nontask performance.
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1222-43. doi: 10.1037/a0037547. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
8
The relationship between cognitive ability and demographic factors in late midlife.
J Aging Health. 2014 Feb;26(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/0898264313508780.
9
More than g: selection quality and adverse impact implications of considering second-stratum cognitive abilities.
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Jul;99(4):547-63. doi: 10.1037/a0035183. Epub 2013 Dec 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验