• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬太尼与吗啡在缺血型胸痛院前治疗中的比较。

Comparison of Fentanyl and Morphine in the Prehospital Treatment of Ischemic Type Chest Pain.

作者信息

Weldon Erin R, Ariano Robert E, Grierson Robert A

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(1):45-51. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1056893. Epub 2015 Aug 17.

DOI:10.3109/10903127.2015.1056893
PMID:26727338
Abstract

In the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, reduction of sympathetic stress and catecholamine release is an important therapeutic goal. One method used to achieve this goal is pain reduction through the systemic administration of analgesia. Historically, morphine has been the analgesic of choice in ischemic cardiac pain. This randomized double-blind controlled trial seeks to prove the utility of fentanyl as an alternate first-line analgesic for ischemic-type chest pain in the prehospital setting. Successive patients who were treated for suspected ischemic chest pain in the emergency medical services system were considered eligible. Once chest pain was confirmed, patients received oxygen, aspirin, and nitroglycerin therapy. If the ischemic-type chest pain continued the patient was randomized in a double-blinded fashion to treatment with either morphine or fentanyl. Pain scale scores, necessity for additional dosing, and rate of adverse events between the groups were assessed every 5 minutes and were compared using t-testing, Fisher's Exact test, or Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) where appropriate. The primary outcome of the study was incidence of hypotension and the secondary outcome was pain reduction as measured by the visual analog score and numeric rating score. A total of 207 patients were randomized with 187 patients included in the final analysis. Of the 187 patients, 99 were in the morphine group and 88 in the fentanyl group. No statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to hypotension was found (morphine 5.1% vs. fentanyl 0%, p = 0.06). Baseline characteristics, necessity for additional dosing, and other adverse events between the two groups were not statistically different. There were no significant differences between the changes in visual analog scores and numeric rating scale scores for pain between the two groups (p = 0.16 and p = 0.15, respectively). This study supports that fentanyl and morphine are comparable in providing analgesia for ischemic-type chest pain. Fentanyl appears to be a safe and effective alternative to morphine for the management of chest pain in the prehospital setting.

摘要

在急性冠脉综合征的治疗中,减轻交感神经应激和儿茶酚胺释放是一个重要的治疗目标。实现这一目标的一种方法是通过全身给予镇痛药来减轻疼痛。从历史上看,吗啡一直是缺血性心脏病疼痛的首选镇痛药。这项随机双盲对照试验旨在证明芬太尼作为院前环境中缺血性胸痛的替代一线镇痛药的效用。在紧急医疗服务系统中因疑似缺血性胸痛接受治疗的连续患者被认为符合条件。一旦胸痛得到确认,患者接受氧气、阿司匹林和硝酸甘油治疗。如果缺血性胸痛持续,患者以双盲方式随机接受吗啡或芬太尼治疗。每5分钟评估一次两组之间的疼痛量表评分、额外给药的必要性和不良事件发生率,并在适当情况下使用t检验、Fisher精确检验或方差分析(ANOVA)进行比较。该研究的主要结局是低血压发生率,次要结局是通过视觉模拟评分和数字评分量表测量的疼痛减轻情况。共有207名患者被随机分组,187名患者纳入最终分析。在这187名患者中,99名在吗啡组,88名在芬太尼组。两组在低血压方面未发现统计学上的显著差异(吗啡组为5.1%,芬太尼组为0%,p = 0.06)。两组之间的基线特征、额外给药的必要性和其他不良事件在统计学上无差异。两组之间视觉模拟评分和数字评分量表评分的疼痛变化无显著差异(分别为p = 0.16和p = 0.15)。这项研究支持芬太尼和吗啡在为缺血性胸痛提供镇痛方面具有可比性。在院前环境中,芬太尼似乎是吗啡治疗胸痛的一种安全有效的替代药物。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Fentanyl and Morphine in the Prehospital Treatment of Ischemic Type Chest Pain.芬太尼与吗啡在缺血型胸痛院前治疗中的比较。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(1):45-51. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1056893. Epub 2015 Aug 17.
2
A randomized, double-blind study comparing morphine with fentanyl in prehospital analgesia.
Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Mar;23(2):114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.03.010.
3
A comparison of ultrasound-guided three-in-one femoral nerve block versus parenteral opioids alone for analgesia in emergency department patients with hip fractures: a randomized controlled trial.超声引导下三合一股神经阻滞与单纯静脉使用阿片类药物在急诊科髋部骨折患者镇痛中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jun;20(6):584-91. doi: 10.1111/acem.12154.
4
Comparison of analgesic effects of morphine, fentanyl, and remifentanil with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后吗啡、芬太尼和瑞芬太尼静脉自控镇痛的镇痛效果比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Dec;18(6):755-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.08.014.
5
Safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for prehospital pain control on the battlefield.口腔黏膜芬太尼枸橼酸盐用于战场院前疼痛控制的安全性和有效性。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6 Suppl 5):S490-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182754674.
6
Nebulized fentanyl vs intravenous morphine for ED patients with acute limb pain: a randomized clinical trial.雾化芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡用于急诊科急性肢体疼痛患者的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):1011-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.05.051. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
7
Does midazolam enhance pain control in prehospital management of traumatic severe pain?咪达唑仑能否增强创伤性剧痛院前处理中的疼痛控制效果?
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;32(6):655-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.01.048. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
8
The effectiveness and adverse events of morphine versus fentanyl on a physician-staffed helicopter.在配备医生的直升机上,吗啡与芬太尼的有效性及不良事件比较
J Emerg Med. 2012 Jul;43(1):69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.018.
9
A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department.一项比较鼻内给予芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡用于急诊科儿童急性疼痛管理的随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;49(3):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
10
Patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl provides effective analgesia for second trimester labour: a randomized controlled study.芬太尼患者自控镇痛用于孕中期分娩的效果:一项随机对照研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2003 Dec;50(10):1039-46. doi: 10.1007/BF03018370.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) Interventions for Burn Patients-A Four-Year Retrospective Analysis.直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)对烧伤患者干预措施的特点——一项四年回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 18;13(24):7738. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247738.
2
Opioids for Treatment of Pre-hospital Acute Pain: A Systematic Review.用于院前急性疼痛治疗的阿片类药物:一项系统评价
Pain Ther. 2022 Mar;11(1):17-36. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00346-w. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
3
Comparative Efficacy of Fentanyl and Morphine in Patients with or At Risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.
芬太尼与吗啡在急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者或有急性呼吸窘迫综合征风险患者中的疗效比较:一项倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Drugs R D. 2021 Jun;21(2):149-155. doi: 10.1007/s40268-021-00338-3. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
4
A Review of Adverse Outcomes Following Intravenous Morphine Usage for Pain Relief in Acute Coronary Syndrome.静脉注射吗啡用于急性冠状动脉综合征止痛后不良结局的综述
Cureus. 2018 Sep 4;10(9):e3246. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3246.
5
Prehospital intravenous fentanyl administered by ambulance personnel: a cluster-randomised comparison of two treatment protocols.院前静脉注射芬太尼由救护人员执行:两种治疗方案的集群随机比较。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Feb 7;27(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0588-4.
6
Effectiveness and safety of fentanyl compared with morphine for out-of-hospital analgesia.芬太尼与吗啡用于院外镇痛的疗效和安全性比较。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Apr-Jun;14(2):167-75. doi: 10.3109/10903120903572301.