Jenkins Melissa M, Youngstrom Eric A
Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego.
Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Apr;84(4):323-33. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000070. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
This study examined the efficacy of a new cognitive debiasing intervention in reducing decision-making errors in the assessment of pediatric bipolar disorder (PBD).
The study was a randomized controlled trial using case vignette methodology. Participants were 137 mental health professionals working in different regions of the United States (M = 8.6 ± 7.5 years of experience). Participants were randomly assigned to a (a) brief overview of PBD (control condition), or (b) the same brief overview plus a cognitive debiasing intervention (treatment condition) that educated participants about common cognitive pitfalls (e.g., base-rate neglect, search satisficing) and taught corrective strategies (e.g., mnemonics, Bayesian tools). Both groups evaluated 4 identical case vignettes. Primary outcome measures were clinicians' diagnoses and treatment decisions. The vignette characters' race or ethnicity was experimentally manipulated.
Participants in the treatment group showed better overall judgment accuracy, p < .001, and committed significantly fewer decision-making errors, p < .001. Inaccurate and somewhat accurate diagnostic decisions were significantly associated with different treatment and clinical recommendations, particularly in cases where participants missed comorbid conditions, failed to detect the possibility of hypomania or mania in depressed youths, and misdiagnosed classic manic symptoms. In contrast, effects of patient race were negligible.
The cognitive debiasing intervention outperformed the control condition. Examining specific heuristics in cases of PBD may identify especially problematic mismatches between typical habits of thought and characteristics of the disorder. The debiasing intervention was brief and delivered via the Web; it has the potential to generalize and extend to other diagnoses as well as to various practice and training settings.
本研究考察了一种新的认知偏差矫正干预措施在减少小儿双相情感障碍(PBD)评估中的决策错误方面的效果。
本研究是一项采用病例 vignette 方法的随机对照试验。参与者为 137 名在美国不同地区工作的心理健康专业人员(平均工作经验为 8.6 ± 7.5 年)。参与者被随机分配到(a)PBD 的简要概述(对照条件),或(b)相同的简要概述加上认知偏差矫正干预(治疗条件),该干预向参与者介绍常见的认知陷阱(例如,基础比率忽视、搜索满足)并教授纠正策略(例如,记忆术、贝叶斯工具)。两组都评估了 4 个相同的病例 vignette。主要结局指标是临床医生的诊断和治疗决策。对 vignette 中人物的种族或民族进行了实验性操纵。
治疗组的参与者总体判断准确性更高,p <.001,并且决策错误显著更少,p <.001。不准确和大致准确的诊断决策与不同的治疗和临床建议显著相关,特别是在参与者遗漏共病情况、未能检测到抑郁青少年出现轻躁狂或躁狂的可能性以及误诊典型躁狂症状的病例中。相比之下,患者种族的影响可以忽略不计。
认知偏差矫正干预优于对照条件。检查 PBD 病例中的特定启发式方法可能会发现典型思维习惯与该疾病特征之间特别成问题的不匹配。这种偏差矫正干预很简短且通过网络进行;它有可能推广并扩展到其他诊断以及各种实践和培训环境。