Baker-Ericzén Mary J, Jenkins Melissa M, Park Soojin, Garland Ann F
Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego.
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego.
Child Youth Care Forum. 2015 Feb 1;44(1):133-157. doi: 10.1007/s10566-014-9274-x.
Mental health professionals' decision-making practice is an area of increasing interest and importance, especially in the pediatric research and clinical communities.
The present study explored the role of prior training in evidence-based treatments on clinicians' assessment and treatment formulations using case vignettes. Specifically, study aims included using the Naturalistic Decision Making (NDM) cognitive theory to 1) examine potential associations between EBT training and decision-making processes (novice versus expert type), and 2) explore how client and family contextual information affects clinical decision-making.
Forty-eight clinicians across two groups (EBT trained=14, Not EBT trained=34) participated. Clinicians were comparable on professional experience, demographics, and discipline. The quasi-experimental design used an analog "think aloud" method where clinicians read case vignettes about a child with disruptive behavior problems and verbalized case conceptualization and treatment planning out-loud. Responses were coded according to NDM theory.
MANOVA results were significant for EBT training status such that EBT trained clinicians' displayed cognitive processes more closely aligned with "expert" decision-makers and non-EBT trained clinicians' decision processes were more similar to "novice" decision-makers, following NDM theory. Non-EBT trained clinicians assigned significantly more diagnoses, provided less detailed treatment plans and discussed fewer EBTs. Parent/family contextual information also appeared to influence decision-making.
This study offers a preliminary investigation of the possible broader impacts of EBT training and potential associations with development of expert decision-making skills. Targeting clinicians' decision-making may be an important avenue to pursue within dissemination-implementation efforts in mental health practice.
心理健康专业人员的决策实践是一个越来越受关注且重要的领域,尤其是在儿科研究和临床领域。
本研究使用病例 vignettes 探讨了循证治疗方面的先前培训对临床医生评估和治疗方案制定的作用。具体而言,研究目标包括运用自然决策(NDM)认知理论来:1)检验循证治疗培训与决策过程(新手与专家类型)之间的潜在关联;2)探究客户和家庭背景信息如何影响临床决策。
两组共 48 名临床医生参与(接受循证治疗培训的 = 14 名,未接受循证治疗培训的 = 34 名)。临床医生在专业经验、人口统计学特征和学科方面具有可比性。准实验设计采用模拟“出声思考”方法,即临床医生阅读关于一名有破坏性行为问题儿童的病例 vignettes,并大声说出病例概念化和治疗计划。根据 NDM 理论对回答进行编码。
多变量方差分析结果显示循证治疗培训状态具有显著性,即根据 NDM 理论,接受循证治疗培训的临床医生所展现的认知过程与“专家”决策者更为接近,而未接受循证治疗培训的临床医生的决策过程更类似于“新手”决策者。未接受循证治疗培训的临床医生做出的诊断显著更多,提供的治疗计划细节更少,且讨论的循证治疗方法也更少。父母/家庭背景信息似乎也会影响决策。
本研究对循证治疗培训可能产生的更广泛影响以及与专家决策技能发展的潜在关联进行了初步调查。针对临床医生的决策制定可能是心理健康实践传播 - 实施工作中一个重要的探索途径。