Suppr超能文献

卫生系统指南评估——概念评估与可用性测试

Health system guidance appraisal--concept evaluation and usability testing.

作者信息

Ako-Arrey Denis E, Brouwers Melissa C, Lavis John N, Giacomini Mita K

机构信息

McMaster University, Juravinski Hospital Site, G Wing, 2nd Floor, Room 207, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 1C3, Canada.

McMaster University, MML-417, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L6, Canada.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2016 Jan 5;11:3. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0365-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health system guidance (HSG) provides recommendations aimed to address health system challenges. However, there is a paucity of methods to direct, appraise, and report HSG. Earlier research identified 30 candidate criteria (concepts) that can be used to evaluate the quality of HSG and guide development and reporting requirements. The objective of this paper was to describe two studies aimed at evaluating the importance of these 30 criteria, design a draft HSG appraisal tool, and test its usability.

METHODS

This study involved a two-step survey process. In step 1, respondents rated the 30 concepts for appropriateness to, relevance to, and priority for health system decisions and HSG. This led to a draft tool. In step 2, respondents reviewed HSG documents, appraised them using the tool, and answered a series of questions. Descriptive analyses were computed.

RESULTS

Fifty participants were invited in step 1, and we had a response rate of 82 %. The mean response rates for each concept within each survey question were universally favorable. There was also an overall agreement about the need for a high-quality tool to systematically direct the development, appraisal, and reporting of HSG. Qualitative feedback and a consensus process by the team led to refinements to some of the concepts and the creation of a beta (draft) version of the HSG tool. In step 2, 35 participants were invited and we had a response rate of 74 %. Exploratory analyses showed that the quality of the HSGs reviewed varied as a function of the HSG item and the specific document assessed. A favorable consensus was reached with participants agreeing that the HSG items were easy to understand and easy to apply. Moreover, the overall agreement was high for the usability of the tool to systematically direct the development (85 %), appraisal (92 %), and reporting (81 %) of HSG. From this process, version 1.0 of the HSG appraisal tool was generated complete with 32 items (and their descriptions) and 4 domains.

CONCLUSIONS

The final tool, named the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation for Health Systems (AGREE-HS) (version 1), defines expectations of HSG and facilitates informed decisions among policymakers on health system delivery, financial, and governance arrangements.

摘要

背景

卫生系统指南(HSG)提供旨在应对卫生系统挑战的建议。然而,指导、评估和报告HSG的方法却很匮乏。早期研究确定了30条候选标准(概念),可用于评估HSG的质量并指导其制定和报告要求。本文的目的是描述两项旨在评估这30条标准的重要性、设计HSG评估工具草案并测试其可用性的研究。

方法

本研究涉及一个两步调查过程。在第一步中,受访者对这30个概念在卫生系统决策和HSG中的适用性、相关性和优先级进行评分。这产生了一个工具草案。在第二步中,受访者审查HSG文件,使用该工具对其进行评估,并回答一系列问题。进行了描述性分析。

结果

第一步邀请了50名参与者,回复率为82%。每个调查问题中每个概念的平均回复率普遍良好。对于需要一个高质量工具来系统地指导HSG的制定、评估和报告也达成了总体共识。团队的定性反馈和共识过程导致对一些概念进行了完善,并创建了HSG工具的测试版(草案)。在第二步中,邀请了35名参与者,回复率为74%。探索性分析表明,所审查的HSG的质量因HSG项目和所评估的具体文件而异。与参与者达成了良好的共识,他们一致认为HSG项目易于理解且易于应用。此外,对于该工具在系统指导HSG的制定(85%)、评估(92%)和报告(81%)方面的可用性,总体共识度很高。通过这个过程,生成了HSG评估工具1.0版,其中包含32个项目(及其描述)和4个领域。

结论

最终工具名为卫生系统研究与评估指南评估(AGREE-HS)(第1版),定义了对HSG的期望,并有助于政策制定者在卫生系统提供、财务和治理安排方面做出明智决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/42dd/4700602/de1e68362504/13012_2015_365_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验