• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康系统指导评估工具(AGREE-HS)的有效性和可用性测试。

Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS.

机构信息

McMaster University, Juravinski Site, G2 Wing, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.

McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West MML-417, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4L8, Canada.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9
PMID:29925394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6011397/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health systems guidance (HSG) provides recommendations to address health systems challenges. No tools exist to inform HSG developers and users about the components of high quality HSG and to differentiate between HSG of varying quality. In response, we developed a tool to assist with the development, reporting and appraisal of HSG - the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation-Health Systems (AGREE-HS). This paper reports on the validity, usability and initial measurement properties of the AGREE-HS.

METHODS

To establish face validity (Study 1), stakeholders completed a survey about the AGREE-HS and provided feedback on its content and structure. Revisions to the tool were made in response. To establish usability (Study 2), the revised tool was applied to 85 HSG documents and the appraisers provided feedback about their experiences via an online survey. An initial test of the revised tool's measurement properties, including internal consistency, inter-rater reliability and criterion validity, was conducted. Additional revisions to the tool were made in response.

RESULTS

In Study 1, the AGREE-HS Overview, User Manual, quality item content and structure, and overall assessment questions were rated favourably. Participants indicated that the AGREE-HS would be useful, feasible to use, and that they would apply it in their context. In Study 2, participants indicated that the quality items were easy to understand and apply, and the User Manual, usefulness and usability of the tool were rated favourably. Study 2 participants also indicated intentions to use the AGREE-HS.

CONCLUSIONS

The AGREE-HS comprises a User Manual, five quality items and two overall assessment questions. It is available at agreetrust.org.

摘要

背景

卫生系统指南(HSG)提供了应对卫生系统挑战的建议。目前尚无工具可以告知 HSG 开发者和使用者高质量 HSG 的组成部分,并区分不同质量的 HSG。有鉴于此,我们开发了一种工具,以协助 HSG 的制定、报告和评估——评估卫生系统研究和评价指南(AGREE-HS)。本文报告了 AGREE-HS 的有效性、可用性和初步测量特性。

方法

为了确立表面有效性(研究 1),利益相关者完成了一项关于 AGREE-HS 的调查,并就其内容和结构提供了反馈。根据反馈对工具进行了修订。为了确立可用性(研究 2),修订后的工具应用于 85 份 HSG 文件,评估者通过在线调查提供了他们的经验反馈。对修订后的工具的初步测量特性进行了测试,包括内部一致性、评分者间可靠性和标准有效性。根据反馈对工具进行了进一步修订。

结果

在研究 1 中,AGREE-HS 概述、用户手册、质量项目内容和结构以及总体评估问题的评分较高。参与者表示,AGREE-HS 将是有用的、可行的,并且将在他们的环境中应用。在研究 2 中,参与者表示质量项目易于理解和应用,用户手册、工具的有用性和可用性得到了较高的评价。研究 2 的参与者也表示有意使用 AGREE-HS。

结论

AGREE-HS 包括用户手册、五个质量项目和两个总体评估问题。它可在 agreetrust.org 获得。

相似文献

1
Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS.健康系统指导评估工具(AGREE-HS)的有效性和可用性测试。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0334-9.
2
Assessment of health systems guidance using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation - Health Systems (AGREE-HS) instrument.使用评估健康系统指南研究与评估工具(AGREE-HS)评估健康系统指南。
Health Policy. 2019 Jul;123(7):646-651. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 14.
3
Health system guidance appraisal--concept evaluation and usability testing.卫生系统指南评估——概念评估与可用性测试
Implement Sci. 2016 Jan 5;11:3. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0365-3.
4
Development and Validation of a Tool to Assess the Quality of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations.临床实践指南推荐意见质量评估工具的制定与验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205535. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5535.
5
Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool.使用 AGREE-HS 工具评估大流行期间卫生系统指南报告的质量和完整性。
J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 27;13:06050. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06050.
6
Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application.AGREE II 的发展,第 2 部分:评估项目和工具的有效性以支持应用。
CMAJ. 2010 Jul 13;182(10):E472-8. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.091716. Epub 2010 May 31.
7
Health systems guidance appraisal--a critical interpretive synthesis.卫生系统指南评估——一项批判性诠释性综述
Implement Sci. 2016 Jan 22;11:9. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0373-y.
8
Making the AGREE tool more user-friendly: the feasibility of a user guide based on Boolean operators.使 AGREE 工具更便于用户使用:基于布尔运算符的用户指南的可行性。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):1061-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01265.x.
9
Guideline appraisal with AGREE II: online survey of the potential influence of AGREE II items on overall assessment of guideline quality and recommendation for use.使用AGREE II进行指南评估:关于AGREE II项目对指南质量总体评估及使用建议潜在影响的在线调查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 27;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2954-8.
10
Design and validation of a new Healthcare Systems Usability Scale (HSUS) for clinical decision support systems: a mixed-methods approach.设计和验证一种新的医疗保健系统可用性量表(HSUS)用于临床决策支持系统:一种混合方法。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 30;13(1):e065323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065323.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool.使用 AGREE-HS 工具评估大流行期间卫生系统指南报告的质量和完整性。
J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 27;13:06050. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06050.
2
Appraising Evidence-Based Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) Guidelines-PART I: A Systematic Review on Methodological Quality Using AGREE-HS.评估循证心理健康和社会心理支持 (MHPSS) 指南 - 第一部分:使用 AGREE-HS 对方法学质量进行系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 6;19(5):3107. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053107.
3
AO Spine Adult Spinal Deformity Patient Profile: A Paradigm Shift in Comprehensive Patient Evaluation in Order to Optimize Treatment and Improve Patient Care.AO脊柱成人脊柱畸形患者概况:全面患者评估中的范式转变,以优化治疗并改善患者护理。
Global Spine J. 2023 Jul;13(6):1490-1501. doi: 10.1177/21925682211037935. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
4
Assessment of the quality and content of clinical practice guidelines for post-stroke rehabilitation of aphasia.失语症脑卒中后康复临床实践指南的质量与内容评估
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(31):e16629. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016629.
5
[Concepts. Minimally disruptive medicine].[概念。微创医学]
Aten Primaria. 2018 Nov;50 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):4-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.08.003.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding and measuring quality of care: dealing with complexity.理解与衡量医疗质量:应对复杂性。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 May 1;95(5):368-374. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.179309. Epub 2017 Mar 20.
2
Health systems guidance appraisal--a critical interpretive synthesis.卫生系统指南评估——一项批判性诠释性综述
Implement Sci. 2016 Jan 22;11:9. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0373-y.
3
Health system guidance appraisal--concept evaluation and usability testing.卫生系统指南评估——概念评估与可用性测试
Implement Sci. 2016 Jan 5;11:3. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0365-3.
4
Advancing the field of health systems research synthesis.推动卫生系统研究综合领域的发展。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 10;4:90. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0080-9.
5
Global justice and health systems research in low- and middle-income countries.全球正义与低收入和中等收入国家的卫生系统研究。
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Spring;43(1):143-61. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12202.
6
Health systems, systems thinking and innovation.卫生系统、系统思维与创新。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 4:iv4-8. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs088.
7
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: assessing how much confidence to place in the research evidence.卫生系统循证政策指南:评估对研究证据的信任程度。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001187. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
8
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: linking guidance development to policy development.卫生系统循证政策指南:将指南制定与政策制定联系起来。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001186. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
9
Guidance for evidence-informed policies about health systems: rationale for and challenges of guidance development.卫生系统循证政策指南:制定指南的理由和挑战。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(3):e1001185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001185. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
10
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.《AGREE II:推进卫生保健领域的指南制定、报告与评估》
CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E839-42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449. Epub 2010 Jul 5.