Suppr超能文献

使用 AGREE-HS 工具评估大流行期间卫生系统指南报告的质量和完整性。

Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool.

机构信息

Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.

Center for evidence-based medicine, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 27;13:06050. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06050.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During health emergencies, leading healthcare organisations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC), and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provide guidance for public health response. Previous studies have evaluated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) produced in response to epidemics or pandemics, yet few have focused on public health guidelines and recommendations. To address this gap, we assessed health systems guidance (HSG) produced by the WHO, the ECDC, and the CDC for the 2009 H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics.

METHODS

We extracted HSG for the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics from the organisations' dedicated repositories and websites. After screening the retrieved documents for eligibility, five assessors evaluated them using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation - Health Systems (AGREE-HS) tool to assess the completeness and transparency of reporting according to the five AGREE-HS domains: "Topic", "Participants", "Methods", "Recommendations", and "Implementability".

RESULTS

Following the screening process, we included 108 HSG in the analysis. We observed statistically significant differences between the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics, with HSG issued during COVID-19 receiving higher AGREE-HS scores. The HSG produced by the CDC had significantly lower overall scores and single-domain scores compared to the WHO and ECDC. However, all HSG scored relatively low, under the median of 40 total points (range = 10-70), indicating incomplete reporting. The HSG produced by all three organisations received a median score <4 (range = 1-7) for the "Participants", "Methods", and "Implementability" domains.

CONCLUSIONS

There is still significant progress to be made in the quality and completeness of reporting in HSG issued during pandemics, especially regarding methodological approaches and the composition of the guidance development team. Due to their significant impact and importance for healthcare systems globally, HSG issued during future healthcare crises should adhere to best reporting practices to increase uptake by stakeholders and ensure public trust in healthcare organisations.

摘要

背景

在卫生紧急情况下,世界卫生组织(WHO)、欧洲疾病预防控制中心(ECDC)和美国疾病预防控制中心(CDC)等主要医疗机构为公共卫生应对提供指导。先前的研究评估了针对流行病或大流行制定的临床实践指南(CPG),但很少关注公共卫生指南和建议。为了解决这一差距,我们评估了 WHO、ECDC 和 CDC 为 2009 年 H1N1 和 COVID-19 大流行制定的卫生系统指南(HSG)。

方法

我们从组织的专用存储库和网站中提取了针对 H1N1 和 COVID-19 大流行的 HSG。在对检索到的文件进行资格筛选后,五名评估员使用评估指南研究与评估-卫生系统(AGREE-HS)工具对其进行评估,根据五个 AGREE-HS 领域评估报告的完整性和透明度:“主题”、“参与者”、“方法”、“建议”和“可执行性”。

结果

经过筛选过程,我们共纳入 108 项 HSG 进行分析。我们观察到 H1N1 和 COVID-19 大流行之间存在统计学差异,COVID-19 大流行期间发布的 HSG 获得了更高的 AGREE-HS 评分。与 WHO 和 ECDC 相比,CDC 发布的 HSG 整体得分和单项得分明显较低。然而,所有 HSG 的得分都相对较低,低于总分 40 分的中位数(范围 10-70 分),表明报告不完整。所有三个组织发布的 HSG 在“参与者”、“方法”和“可执行性”这三个领域的中位数均低于 4 分(范围 1-7 分)。

结论

在大流行期间发布的 HSG 中,报告的质量和完整性仍有很大的改进空间,特别是在方法学方法和指导制定团队的组成方面。由于它们对全球医疗保健系统的重大影响和重要性,在未来的医疗保健危机中发布的 HSG 应遵循最佳报告实践,以提高利益相关者的采用率,并确保公众对医疗保健组织的信任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34e0/10602204/22c4beb6e490/jogh-13-06050-F1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验