Yang R, Jiao W, Zhao Y, Qiu T, Wang Y, Luo Y
Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, PR, China.
Indian J Cancer. 2015 Dec;52 Suppl 2:e134-9. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.172511.
Although more and more video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomies via two-port have been performed to treat early-stage nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, concern remains whether it can achieve satisfactory adequacy of lymphadenectomy. This retrospective study was aimed to evaluate the adequacy of lymphadenectomy by VATS via two-port, compared with three-port.
The clinical and pathological data of patients who underwent VATS lobectomy via two-port or three-port with systematic lymphadenectomy for clinical early-stage NSCLC were reviewed. As the main evaluation criterion, the number of mediastinal nodes and node stations, and the total number of nodes and node stations was compared by approach.
1872 patients with NSCLC underwent VATS lobectomy, 1086 via a two-port approach and 786 through a three-port approach. In the two-port and three-port groups, the baseline patient characteristics were similar, and there was no significant difference in the mean number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) (12.3 ± 2.2 and 13.1 ± 1.7, P > 0.05) and the mean number of dissected MLN stations (3.5 ± 0.7 and 3.4 ± 0.8, P > 0.05). Meanwhile, the mean total number of dissected lymph nodes (24.1 ± 4.2 and 25.7 ± 4.3, P > 0.05) and the mean total number of dissected lymph node stations (6.8 ± 1.3 and 6.9 ± 1.1, P > 0.05) were also similar. Otherwise, in terms of postoperative complications, there was no obvious difference in the two groups.
The adequacy of lymphadenectomy including MLN dissection by VATS via two-port is similar to that via three-port for patients undergoing lobectomy for clinical early-stage NSCLC.
尽管近年来越来越多的两孔法电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术被用于治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),但对于其能否实现令人满意的淋巴结清扫充分性仍存在担忧。本回顾性研究旨在评估两孔法VATS与三孔法VATS淋巴结清扫的充分性。
回顾性分析临床早期NSCLC患者接受两孔法或三孔法VATS肺叶切除术并进行系统性淋巴结清扫的临床及病理资料。作为主要评估标准,按手术入路比较纵隔淋巴结数量、淋巴结站数,以及淋巴结总数和淋巴结站总数。
1872例NSCLC患者接受了VATS肺叶切除术,其中1086例采用两孔法入路,786例采用三孔法入路。两孔法组和三孔法组患者的基线特征相似,纵隔淋巴结(MLN)平均清扫数量(12.3±2.2和13.1±1.7,P>0.05)及MLN站平均清扫数量(3.5±0.7和3.4±0.8,P>0.05)无显著差异。同时,淋巴结平均清扫总数(24.1±4.2和25.7±4.3,P>0.05)及淋巴结站平均清扫总数(6.8±1.3和6.9±1.1,P>0.05)也相似。此外,在术后并发症方面,两组无明显差异。
对于临床早期NSCLC行肺叶切除术的患者,两孔法VATS包括MLN清扫在内的淋巴结清扫充分性与三孔法相似。