Debnath Jyotindu, Kumar Rajesh, Mathur Ankit, Sharma Pawan, Kumar Nikhilesh, Shridhar Nagaraj, Shukla Ashwani, Khanna Shiv Pankaj
Department of Radiology, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, 411 040 Maharashtra India.
Department of Surgery, 151 Base Hospital, Guwahati, India.
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 2):221-6. doi: 10.1007/s12262-012-0772-5. Epub 2012 Dec 9.
The purposes of this study were to revisit the utility of ultrasonography (USG) as a primary imaging modality in acute appendicitis (AA) and to establish the role of CT scan as a second-line/problem-solving modality. All cases of suspected AA were referred for urgent USG. USG was done with standard protocol for appendicitis. Limited computed tomographic (CT) scan [NCCT ± CECT (IV contrast only)] was done for the lower abdomen and pelvis where sonographic findings were equivocal. One hundred and twenty-one patients were referred for USG for suspected appendicitis. Eight-four patients underwent surgery for AA based on clinical as well as imaging findings, of whom 76 had appendicitis confirmed at histopathology. Three patients were misdiagnosed (3.6 %) on USG as appendicitis. Of 76 patients of appendicitis confirmed histopathologically, 63 (82.8 %) had features of appendicitis on USG and did not require any additional imaging modality. Of 121 patients, 12 (10 %) needed CT scan because of atypical features on USG. Of these 12 patients, seven had retrocecal appendicitis, and three high-up paracolic appendicitis. USG alone had sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of 81, 88, 92.6, 71.6, and 83 %, respectively. When combined with CT scan in select cases, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of combined USG + CT scan were 96 % (P = 0.0014), 89 %, 93 %, 93.5 % (P = 0.0001), and 93 % (P = 0.0484), respectively. Twenty-eight (23 %) patients were given alternative diagnosis on USG. Dedicated appendiceal USG should be used as a primary imaging modality in diagnosing or excluding AA. Appendiceal CT can serve as a problem-solving modality.
本研究的目的是重新审视超声检查(USG)作为急性阑尾炎(AA)主要成像方式的效用,并确立CT扫描作为二线/解决问题成像方式的作用。所有疑似AA的病例均被转诊进行紧急USG检查。USG检查按照阑尾炎的标准方案进行。对于超声检查结果不明确的下腹部和骨盆,进行有限的计算机断层扫描(CT)[非增强CT±增强CT(仅静脉造影剂)]。121例疑似阑尾炎患者被转诊进行USG检查。84例患者根据临床及影像学检查结果接受了AA手术,其中76例经组织病理学证实为阑尾炎。3例患者在USG检查中被误诊为阑尾炎(3.6%)。在76例经组织病理学证实为阑尾炎的患者中,63例(82.8%)在USG检查中有阑尾炎特征,无需任何其他成像方式。在121例患者中,12例(10%)因USG检查有非典型特征而需要进行CT扫描。在这12例患者中,7例为盲肠后位阑尾炎,3例为高位结肠旁阑尾炎。单独USG检查的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性分别为81%、88%、92.6%、71.6%和83%。在特定病例中将USG与CT扫描相结合时,联合USG+CT扫描的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和准确性分别为96%(P = 0.0014)、89%、93%、93.5%(P = 0.0001)和93%(P = 0.0484)。28例(23%)患者在USG检查中得到了其他诊断。专用阑尾USG检查应用作诊断或排除AA的主要成像方式。阑尾CT可作为解决问题的成像方式。