Suppr超能文献

经皮射频消融与射波刀治疗初发孤立性肝细胞癌的比较:一项初步研究。

Comparison of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and CyberKnife(®) for initial solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: A pilot study.

作者信息

Shiozawa Kazue, Watanabe Manabu, Ikehara Takashi, Matsukiyo Yasushi, Kogame Michio, Kishimoto Yui, Okubo Yusuke, Makino Hiroyuki, Tsukamoto Nobuhiro, Igarashi Yoshinori, Sumino Yasukiyo

机构信息

Kazue Shiozawa, Manabu Watanabe, Takashi Ikehara, Yasushi Matsukiyo, Michio Kogame, Yoshinori Igarashi, Yasukiyo Sumino, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Medical Center, Omori Hospital 6-11-1, Omorinishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo 143-8541, Japan.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 28;21(48):13490-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i48.13490.

Abstract

AIM

To compare therapeutic outcomes and adverse events in initial solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and CyberKnife(®).

METHODS

Seventy three consecutive patients with initial solitary HCC treated with RFA (38 patients; RFA group) and CyberKnife(®) (35 patients; CK group) were enrolled in this study. Background factors were compared between the two groups. Local and intrahepatic distant recurrence control, and cumulative survival rates were compared between the two groups. These were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the significance of differences was analyzed by log-rank test. The presence of more grade 3 on CTCAE ver. 4.0 early and late adverse events was investigated.

RESULTS

In background factors, age was significantly higher (P = 0.005) and the tumor diameter was significantly larger (P = 0.001) in the CK group. The 1-year local recurrence control rates were 97.4% and 97.1% in the RFA and CK groups, respectively (P = 0.71); the 1-year intrahepatic distant recurrence control rates were 85.6% and 86.1%, respectively (P = 0.91); and the 1-year cumulative survival rates were 100% and 95.2%, respectively (P = 0.075), showing no significant difference in any rate between the two groups. There were no late adverse event in the RFA group, but 11.4% in the CK group had late adverse events. In the CK group, the Child-Pugh score at 12 mo after treatment was significantly higher than that in the RFA group (P = 0.003) and significantly higher than the score before treatment (P = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

The occurrence of adverse events is a concern, but CyberKnife(®) treatment is likely to become an important option for local treatment of early HCC.

摘要

目的

比较射频消融(RFA)和射波刀治疗初发孤立性肝细胞癌(HCC)的治疗效果和不良事件。

方法

本研究纳入73例连续的初发孤立性HCC患者,其中38例接受RFA治疗(RFA组),35例接受射波刀治疗(CK组)。比较两组的背景因素。比较两组的局部和肝内远处复发控制情况以及累积生存率。采用Kaplan-Meier法确定上述指标,并通过对数秩检验分析差异的显著性。调查CTCAE ver. 4.0早期和晚期不良事件中3级及以上不良事件的发生情况。

结果

在背景因素方面,CK组年龄显著更高(P = 0.005),肿瘤直径显著更大(P = 0.001)。RFA组和CK组的1年局部复发控制率分别为97.4%和97.1%(P = 0.71);1年肝内远处复发控制率分别为85.6%和86.1%(P = 0.91);1年累积生存率分别为100%和95.2%(P = 0.075),两组各率之间均无显著差异。RFA组无晚期不良事件,而CK组有11.4%发生晚期不良事件。CK组治疗后12个月的Child-Pugh评分显著高于RFA组(P = 0.003),且显著高于治疗前评分(P = 0.034)。

结论

不良事件的发生是一个需要关注的问题,但射波刀治疗可能会成为早期HCC局部治疗的一个重要选择。

相似文献

2
Cyberknife treatment for advanced or terminal stage hepatocellular carcinoma.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 14;21(46):13101-12. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i46.13101.
3
Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma in difficult locations: Strategies and long-term outcomes.
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 7;21(5):1554-66. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i5.1554.
5
[Efficacy of radiofrequency ablation to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma].
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;20(4):256-60. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2012.04.006.
6
Ten-year survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation as a first-line treatment.
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar 14;22(10):2993-3005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i10.2993.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: A meta‑analysis.
Oncol Lett. 2025 Jan 7;29(3):122. doi: 10.3892/ol.2025.14868. eCollection 2025 Mar.
8
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs. Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 29;10:1639. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01639. eCollection 2020.
10
Current status of stereotactic body radiotherapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2019 Sep;36(3):192-200. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2019.00269. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

4
Robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy for tumors of the liver: radiation-induced liver disease, incidence and predictive factors.
Cancer Radiother. 2014 Jun;18(3):191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 May 14.
6
Role of stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar 28;20(12):3100-11. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3100.
7
Stereotactic body radiation therapy as an alternative treatment for small hepatocellular carcinoma.
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 8;8(11):e79854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079854. eCollection 2013.
8
Comparative research on the efficacy of CyberKnife® and surgical excision for Stage I hepatocellular carcinoma.
Onco Targets Ther. 2013 Oct 29;6:1527-32. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S51452. eCollection 2013.
10
Stereotactic body radiotherapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective outcome analysis in 185 patients.
Acta Oncol. 2014 Mar;53(3):399-404. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2013.820342. Epub 2013 Aug 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验