Suppr超能文献

金属烤瓷修复体开放边缘处四种牙科水门汀的微渗漏

Microleakage of Four Dental Cements in Metal Ceramic Restorations With Open Margins.

作者信息

Eftekhar Ashtiani Reza, Farzaneh Babak, Azarsina Mohadese, Aghdashi Farzad, Dehghani Nima, Afshari Aisooda, Mahshid Minu

机构信息

Department of Dental Technology, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

Endodontics Research Center, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran.

出版信息

Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 Nov 1;17(11):e19611. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.19611. eCollection 2015 Nov.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fixed prosthodontics is a routine dental treatment and microleakage is a major cause of its failure.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the marginal microleakage of four cements in metal ceramic restorations with adapted and open margins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty sound human premolars were selected for this experimental study performed in Tehran, Iran and prepared for full-crown restorations. Wax patterns were formed leaving a 300 µm gap on one of the proximal margins. The crowns were cast and the samples were randomly divided into four groups based on the cement used. Copings were cemented using zinc phosphate cement (Fleck), Fuji Plus resin-modified glass ionomer, Panavia F2.0 resin cement, or G-Cem resin cement, according to the manufacturers' instructions. Samples were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution. After 24 hours, dye penetration was assessed under a stereomicroscope and analyzed using the respective software. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, paired t-tests, and Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon, and Mann-Whitney tests.

RESULTS

The least microleakage occurred in the Panavia F2.0 group (closed margin, 0.18 mm; open margin, 0.64 mm) and the maximum was observed in the Fleck group (closed margin, 1.92 mm; open margin, 3.32 mm). The Fleck group displayed significantly more microleakage compared to the Fuji Plus and Panavia F2.0 groups (P < 0.001) in both closed and open margins. In open margins, differences in microleakage between the Fuji Plus and G-Cem as well as between the G-Cem and Panavia F2.0 groups were significant (P < 0.001). In closed margins, only the G-Cem group displayed significantly more microleakage as compared to the Panavia F2.0 group (P < 0.05). Paired t-test results showed significantly more microleakage in open margins compared to closed margins, except in the Fuji Plus group (P = 0.539).

CONCLUSIONS

Fuji Plus cement exhibited better sealing ability in closed and open margins compared to G-Cem and Fleck cements. When using G-Cem and Fleck cements for full metal ceramic restorations, clinicians should try to minimize marginal gaps in order to reduce restoration failure. In situations where there are doubts about perfect marginal adaptation, the use of Fuji Plus cement may be helpful.

摘要

背景

固定修复是一种常规的牙科治疗方法,微渗漏是其失败的主要原因。

目的

本研究旨在评估四种粘结剂在边缘适配和开放的金属烤瓷修复体中的边缘微渗漏情况。

材料与方法

选取60颗健康人前磨牙用于在伊朗德黑兰进行的本实验研究,并制备全冠修复体。制作蜡型,在其中一个邻面边缘留出300 µm的间隙。铸造全冠,根据所使用的粘结剂将样本随机分为四组。按照制造商的说明,使用磷酸锌粘结剂(Fleck)、富士Ⅱ玻璃离子水门汀、帕纳维亚F2.0树脂粘结剂或G-Cem树脂粘结剂粘结基底冠。将样本浸入2%的亚甲蓝溶液中。24小时后,在体视显微镜下评估染料渗透情况,并使用相应软件进行分析。数据采用方差分析、配对t检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、Wilcoxon检验和Mann-Whitney检验进行分析。

结果

帕纳维亚F2.0组的微渗漏最少(边缘封闭时为0.18 mm;边缘开放时为0.64 mm),Fleck组的微渗漏最多(边缘封闭时为1.92 mm;边缘开放时为3.32 mm)。在边缘封闭和开放的情况下,Fleck组的微渗漏均显著多于富士Ⅱ组和帕纳维亚F2.0组(P < 0.001)。在边缘开放时,富士Ⅱ组与G-Cem组以及G-Cem组与帕纳维亚F2.0组之间的微渗漏差异显著(P < 0.001)。在边缘封闭时,只有G-Cem组的微渗漏显著多于帕纳维亚F2.0组(P < 0.05)。配对t检验结果显示,除富士Ⅱ组外(P = 0.539),边缘开放时的微渗漏显著多于边缘封闭时。

结论

与G-Cem粘结剂和Fleck粘结剂相比,富士Ⅱ粘结剂在边缘封闭和开放时均表现出更好的密封能力。当使用G-Cem粘结剂和Fleck粘结剂进行全金属烤瓷修复时,临床医生应尽量减少边缘间隙,以降低修复失败的风险。在对边缘适配情况存在疑问时,使用富士Ⅱ粘结剂可能会有所帮助。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/824b/4696128/f02781389e39/ircmj-17-11-19611-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验