• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种粘结水门汀粘结金属基底冠边缘微渗漏的比较。

Comparison of marginal microleakage of metal copings cemented with three luting cements.

作者信息

Vargas-Belón Keyla, Chambilla-Torres Katya, Sánchez-Tito Marco

机构信息

Private practice, Tacna, Peru.

Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada de Tacna, Tacna, Peru.

出版信息

J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Mar 1;14(3):e280-e284. doi: 10.4317/jced.59343. eCollection 2022 Mar.

DOI:10.4317/jced.59343
PMID:35317294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8916601/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the marginal microleakage in single metal copings cemented with zinc phosphate, glass ionomer, and resin-modified ionomer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An experimental in vitro study was carried out. The calculation of the sample was determined using the G*Power software; 15 premolars were considered per group. The teeth were carved considering a preparation with a chamfer-type shoulder with an angulation of 6°. Working models were obtained, where the metallic copings were made. Cementation was carried out with zinc phosphate (Prothoplast), glass ionomer (Ketac-Cem Easymix), and resin-modified ionomer (Relyx™ Luting 2) cements. The samples were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution for 24 hours. The microleakage measurement was carried out with a 40x stereo microscope at four measurement points (vestibular, lingual, mesial, and distal). In order to compare the microleakage values, the ANOVA test was carried out, followed by the Scheffé test. A significance level of 5% was adopted.

RESULTS

The zinc phosphate cement showed the highest values of marginal microfiltration (109.28 ± 51.27 µm) followed by the resin-modified ionomer cement (102.63 ± 45.07 µm) and the ionomer of glass (98.64 ± 39.18 µm), although these differences were not statistically significant (>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Zinc phosphate, glass ionomer, and resin-modified ionomer cements exhibited similar properties to prevent marginal microfiltration in unitary metal copings. Cementation, dental leakage, dental restoration failure.

摘要

背景

评估用磷酸锌、玻璃离子体和树脂改性离子体粘结的单金属冠的边缘微渗漏情况。

材料与方法

进行了一项体外实验研究。使用G*Power软件确定样本量;每组考虑15颗前磨牙。制备牙齿时采用6°角的倒凹型肩台。制作工作模型,在其上制作金属冠。分别用磷酸锌(Prothoplast)、玻璃离子体(Ketac-Cem Easymix)和树脂改性离子体(Relyx™ Luting 2)粘结剂进行粘结。将样本浸入2%的亚甲蓝溶液中24小时。用40倍立体显微镜在四个测量点(唇侧、舌侧、近中、远中)进行微渗漏测量。为比较微渗漏值,进行方差分析,随后进行谢费检验。采用5%的显著性水平。

结果

磷酸锌粘结剂的边缘微渗漏值最高(109.28±51.27µm),其次是树脂改性离子体粘结剂(102.63±45.07µm)和玻璃离子体(98.64±39.18µm),尽管这些差异无统计学意义(>0.05)。

结论

磷酸锌、玻璃离子体和树脂改性离子体粘结剂在防止单一金属冠边缘微渗漏方面表现出相似的性能。粘结、牙齿渗漏、牙齿修复失败。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b0f/8916601/1fe98d71a07f/jced-14-e280-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b0f/8916601/1f7e629ac2e8/jced-14-e280-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b0f/8916601/1fe98d71a07f/jced-14-e280-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b0f/8916601/1f7e629ac2e8/jced-14-e280-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b0f/8916601/1fe98d71a07f/jced-14-e280-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of marginal microleakage of metal copings cemented with three luting cements.三种粘结水门汀粘结金属基底冠边缘微渗漏的比较。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Mar 1;14(3):e280-e284. doi: 10.4317/jced.59343. eCollection 2022 Mar.
2
Marginal adaptation and microleakage of Procera AllCeram crowns with four cements.使用四种粘结剂的Procera全瓷冠的边缘适合性和微渗漏
Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):529-35.
3
In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.粘接水门汀和全冠基底材料的体外微渗漏
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Mar;85(3):292-8. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113705.
4
Comparative evaluation of microleakage of metallic copings luted with three different commercially available luting cements: An study.三种不同商业用黏固剂黏固的金属冠的微渗漏的比较评价:一项研究。
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jan-Mar;21(1):57-65. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_19_20.
5
Microleakage of Four Dental Cements in Metal Ceramic Restorations With Open Margins.金属烤瓷修复体开放边缘处四种牙科水门汀的微渗漏
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 Nov 1;17(11):e19611. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.19611. eCollection 2015 Nov.
6
Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation.不同陶瓷材料、边缘线及粘结剂的全瓷冠垂直边缘差异:一项体外评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Sep;92(3):250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.06.023.
7
Marginal Fit of Metal-Ceramic Copings: Effect of Luting Cements and Tooth Preparation Design.金属-陶瓷修复体的边缘适合性:水门汀和牙体预备设计的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e265-e270. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12685. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
8
Microleakage of adhesive and nonadhesive luting cements for stainless steel crowns.不锈钢冠用粘结性和非粘结性粘结水门汀的微渗漏
Pediatr Dent. 2011 Nov-Dec;33(7):501-4.
9
An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study.使用三种不同粘结水门汀对镍铬合金铸造修复体的固位和边缘密合性的评估:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Jan-Feb;23(1):20-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.99032.
10
Correlation between margin fit and microleakage in complete crowns cemented with three luting agents.三种粘结剂粘结的全冠边缘适合性与微渗漏之间的相关性
J Appl Oral Sci. 2008 Jan-Feb;16(1):64-9. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572008000100013.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Microleakage in Nanocomposite and Amalgam as a Crown Foundation Material Luted with Different Luting Cements under CAD-CAM Milled Metal Crowns: An In Vitro Microscopic Study.CAD-CAM 铣削金属冠下纳米复合材料和汞合金作为冠修复基底材料并用不同粘结水门汀粘结时微渗漏的比较:一项体外显微镜研究
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jun 27;14(13):2609. doi: 10.3390/polym14132609.

本文引用的文献

1
In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Different Luting Cements and Tooth Preparation Angle on the Microleakage of Zirconia Crowns.不同粘结水门汀和牙体预备角度对氧化锆全冠微渗漏影响的体外评价
Int J Dent. 2021 Aug 6;2021:8461579. doi: 10.1155/2021/8461579. eCollection 2021.
2
An up to 43-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthetic restorations retained with 4-META/MMA-TBB resin cement or zinc phosphate cement.一项长达43年的纵向研究,该研究针对使用4-META/MMA-TBB树脂水门汀或磷酸锌水门汀固定的修复体。
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Jan;129(1):83-88. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.004. Epub 2021 Jun 24.
3
Survival of Single-Unit Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal (PFM) and Metal Crowns Placed by Students at an Australian University Dental Clinic over a Five-Year Period.
澳大利亚一所大学牙科诊所学生放置的单单位烤瓷熔附金属(PFM)冠和金属冠在五年期间的留存情况。
Dent J (Basel). 2021 May 28;9(6):60. doi: 10.3390/dj9060060.
4
Influence of Bioactive, Resin and Glass Ionomer luting cements on the fracture loads of dentin bonded ceramic crowns.生物活性、树脂和玻璃离子水门汀对牙本质粘结陶瓷冠断裂载荷的影响。
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Mar-Apr;36(3):416-421. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.3.1946.
5
The antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of a copper-loaded zinc oxide phosphate cement.载铜氧化锌磷酸盐水泥的抗菌和细胞毒性作用。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Nov;24(11):3899-3909. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03257-w. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
6
Comparative evaluation of marginal adaptation and microleakage of low-shrinking composites after thermocycling and mechanical loading.热循环和机械加载后低收缩复合材料边缘适应性和微渗漏的比较评估
Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 May;22(5):633-641. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_567_18.
7
A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.氧化锆陶瓷-陶瓷和金属-陶瓷单冠的存活率和并发症发生率的系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:199-214. doi: 10.1111/clr.13306.
8
Comparison of resin modified glass ionomer cement and composite resin in class II primary molar restorations: a 2-year parallel randomised clinical trial.树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀与复合树脂用于Ⅱ类乳磨牙修复的比较:一项为期2年的平行随机临床试验。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Dec;19(6):393-401. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0371-7. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
9
In vitro comparison of microleakge between preformed metal crowns and aesthetic crowns of primary molars using different adhesive luting cements.使用不同粘结水门汀对乳牙预成金属冠和美学冠之间微渗漏的体外比较
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018 Dec;19(6):387-392. doi: 10.1007/s40368-018-0369-1. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
10
Zinc phosphate as a definitive cement for implant-supported crowns and fixed dentures.磷酸锌作为种植体支持的冠和固定义齿的最终黏固剂。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2017 Nov 3;9:93-97. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S146544. eCollection 2017.