Kölling Sarah, Steinacker Jürgen M, Endler Stefan, Ferrauti Alexander, Meyer Tim, Kellmann Michael
a Ruhr University Bochum , Faculty of Sport Science , Bochum , Germany.
b University Medical Centre Ulm , Sports and Rehabilitation Medicine , Ulm , Germany.
Chronobiol Int. 2016;33(1):73-84. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2015.1118384. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
Recovery is essential for high athletic performance, and therefore especially sleep has been identified as a crucial source for physical and psychological well-being. However, due to early-morning trainings, which are general practice in many sports, athletes are likely to experience sleep restrictions. Therefore, this study investigated the sleep-wake patterns of 55 junior national rowers (17.7 ± 0.6 years) via sleep logs and actigraphy during a four-week training camp. Recovery and stress ratings were obtained every morning with the Short Recovery and Stress Scale on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (does not apply at all) to 6 (fully applies). The first training session was scheduled for 6:30 h every day. With two to four training sessions per day, the training load was considerably increased from athletes' home training. Objective sleep measures (n = 14) revealed less total sleep time (TST) in the first two weeks (409.6 ± 19.1 and 416.0 ± 16.3 min), while training volume and intensity were higher. In the second half of the camp, less training sessions were implemented, more afternoons were training free and TSTs were longer (436.3 ± 15.8 and 456.9 ± 25.7 min). A single occasion of 1.5-h delayed bedtime and usual early morning training (6:30 h) resulted in reduced ratings of Overall Recovery (OR) (M = 3.3 ± 1.3) and greater Negative Emotional State (NES) (M = 1.3 ± 1.2, p < .05), which returned to baseline on the next day. Following an extended night due to the only training-free day, sleep-offset times were shifted from ~5:30 to ~8:00 h, and each recovery and stress score improved (p < .01). Moreover, subjective ratings of the first six days were summarised as a baseline score to generate reference data as well as to explore the association between sleep and recovery. Intercorrelations of these sleep parameters emphasised the relationship between restful sleep and falling asleep quickly (r = .34, p < .05) as well as few awakenings (r = .35, p < .05). Overall, the findings highlight the impact of sleep on subjective recovery measures in the setting of a training camp. Providing the opportunity of extended sleep (and a day off) seems the most simple and effective strategy to enhance recovery and stress-related ratings.
恢复对于高水平的运动表现至关重要,因此,睡眠尤其被视为身心健康的关键因素。然而,由于许多运动项目普遍存在晨练的情况,运动员很可能会出现睡眠受限的问题。因此,本研究通过睡眠日志和活动记录仪,对55名国家青年赛艇运动员(17.7±0.6岁)在为期四周的训练营期间的睡眠-觉醒模式进行了调查。每天早晨使用简短恢复与压力量表以7点李克特量表的形式获取恢复和压力评分,范围从0(完全不适用)到6(完全适用)。每天的第一次训练安排在6:30。每天进行两到四次训练,训练负荷比运动员在家训练时大幅增加。客观睡眠指标(n = 14)显示,在前两周总睡眠时间(TST)较少(409.6±19.1和416.0±16.3分钟),而训练量和强度较高。在训练营的后半段,训练次数减少,更多下午时间没有训练,总睡眠时间更长(436.3±15.8和456.9±25.7分钟)。一次将就寝时间推迟1.5小时并像往常一样进行晨练(6:30)导致总体恢复(OR)评分降低(M = 3.3±1.3),负面情绪状态(NES)增强(M = 1.3±1.2,p <.05),第二天恢复到基线水平。由于唯一的休息日导致夜间延长后,起床时间从大约5:30推迟到大约8:00,各项恢复和压力评分均有所改善(p <.01)。此外,将前六天的主观评分汇总为基线分数,以生成参考数据并探索睡眠与恢复之间的关联。这些睡眠参数的相互关联强调了安稳睡眠与快速入睡(r = 0.34,p <.05)以及较少觉醒(r = 0.35,p <.05)之间的关系。总体而言,研究结果突出了睡眠对训练营环境下主观恢复指标的影响。提供延长睡眠时间(和一天休息日)的机会似乎是增强恢复和与压力相关评分的最简单有效的策略。