IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Unit of Radiology, Piazza Malan 2-20097 San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy,
Insights Imaging. 2014 Apr;5(2):209-16. doi: 10.1007/s13244-014-0315-7. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
To assess the clinical and the economic impacts of intraprocedural use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in patients undergoing percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for small (<2.5 cm) hepatocellular carcinomas.
One hundred and forty-eight hepatocellular carcinomas in 93 patients were treated by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and immediate assessment by intraprocedural CEUS. Clinical impact, cost effectiveness, and budget, organisational and equity impacts were evaluated and compared with standard treatment without intraprocedural CEUS using the health technology assessment approach.
Intraprocedural CEUS detected incomplete ablation in 34/93 (36.5 %) patients, who underwent additional treatment during the same session. At 24-h, complete ablation was found in 88/93 (94.6 %) patients. Thus, a second session of treatment was spared in 29/93 (31.1 %) patients. Cost-effectiveness analysis revealed an advantage for the use of intraprocedural CEUS in comparison with standard treatment (4,639 vs 6,592) with a 21.9 % reduction of the costs to treat the whole sample. Cost per patient for complete treatment was
Intraprocedural use of CEUS has a relevant clinical impact, reducing the number of re-treatments and the related costs per patient.
• CEUS allows to immediately asses the result of ablation. • Intraprocedural CEUS decreases the number of second ablative sessions. • Intraprocedural CEUS may reduce cost per patient for complete treatment. • Use of intraprocedural CEUS may reduce hospital budget. • Its introduction has low organisational impact, and relevant impact on equity.
评估经皮射频消融治疗小肝癌(<2.5cm)患者术中应用对比增强超声(CEUS)的临床和经济影响。
93 例患者共 148 个肝癌接受经皮射频消融治疗,并立即行术中 CEUS 评估。采用卫生技术评估方法,评估并比较术中 CEUS 与无术中 CEUS 的标准治疗在临床影响、成本效果、预算、组织和公平方面的影响。
术中 CEUS 发现 34/93(36.5%)例患者存在不完全消融,这些患者在同一次治疗中接受了额外治疗。在 24 小时时,93 例患者中 88 例(94.6%)发现完全消融。因此,93 例患者中有 29 例(31.1%)避免了第二次治疗。成本效果分析显示,与标准治疗相比,术中 CEUS 的应用具有优势(4639 欧元对 6592 欧元),整个样本的治疗成本降低了 21.9%。完全治疗的每位患者成本分别为<欧元>4609 欧元和<欧元>5872 欧元。术中 CEUS 的应用导致组织影响低,公平性方面具有积极影响。
术中 CEUS 的应用具有重要的临床影响,可减少再次治疗的次数和每位患者的相关治疗成本。
CEUS 可立即评估消融效果。
术中 CEUS 减少了二次消融治疗的次数。
术中 CEUS 可能降低完全治疗的每位患者的成本。
术中 CEUS 的使用可能减少医院预算。
其引入对公平性具有重要影响,对组织影响低。