• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化对父母患癌家庭的社交网络支持:癌症-PEPSONE研究的研究方案

Optimizing Social Network Support to Families Living With Parental Cancer: Research Protocol for the Cancer-PEPSONE Study.

作者信息

Hauken May Aasebø, Senneseth Mette, Dyregrov Atle, Dyregrov Kari

机构信息

Center for Crisis Psychology, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Dec 30;4(4):e142. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5055.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.5055
PMID:26733339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4712344/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parental cancer can have a significant impact on a family's psychosocial functioning and quality of life, whereby the children's situation is strongly related to parental coping and capacity. Such parents ask for more help in order to increase their care capacity, while the network is often insecure about how to help and thereby withdraw. They ask for guidance and training to be able to support cancer families. Based on this, the Cancer- Psycho-Educational Program for the SOcial NEtwork (PEPSONE) study was developed.

OBJECTIVE

To optimize social network support through a psycho-educational program for families living with parental cancer and their network members in order to increase parental capacity and thereby secure the children's safety and quality of life.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which families (N=60) living with parental cancer will be randomized to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention will last for 3 hours and includes (1) introduction, (2) psycho-education (living with cancer in the family and the importance of social network support), and (3) discussion (this family's need for social support). Primary outcomes are social support, mental health, and quality of life, and secondary outcomes are resilience and parental capacity. Data will be collected by a set of questionnaires distributed to healthy parents (N=60) living with a partner with cancer, one child in the family between 8-18 years of age (N=60), and network members (N=210) of the intervention families at inclusion, and after 3 and 6 months. Comparing differences between the intervention group (n=30) and the control group (n=30), the power analysis shows that P<.05 and a statistical power = .80 would detect effect sizes of clinical interest.

RESULTS

This paper presents the Cancer-PEPSON study's protocol to provide a broader understanding of the background and content of the program. The study is ongoing until August 2016 and the first results are anticipated to be finished by November 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this will be the first RCT study to optimize social network support through a psycho-educational program for families living with parental cancer and their network members, as well as provide an evidence basis for social network support. The results may provide important knowledge that is useful for clinical practice and further research. The trial is reported according to the CONSORT checklist.

CLINICALTRIAL

International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN): 15982171; http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN15982171/15982171 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6cg9zunS0).

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/4712344/7dc876fc48ab/resprot_v4i4e142_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/4712344/1a1c4512d6ca/resprot_v4i4e142_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/4712344/7dc876fc48ab/resprot_v4i4e142_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/4712344/1a1c4512d6ca/resprot_v4i4e142_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05e9/4712344/7dc876fc48ab/resprot_v4i4e142_fig2.jpg
摘要

背景

父母患癌症会对家庭的心理社会功能和生活质量产生重大影响,儿童的情况与父母的应对方式和能力密切相关。这类父母寻求更多帮助以提高其照顾能力,而社交网络往往不确定如何提供帮助,从而选择退缩。他们需要指导和培训,以便能够支持癌症患者家庭。基于此,开展了针对社交网络的癌症心理教育项目(PEPSONE)研究。

目的

通过为父母患癌症的家庭及其社交网络成员开展心理教育项目,优化社交网络支持,以提高父母的能力,从而保障儿童的安全和生活质量。

方法

一项随机对照试验(RCT),将60个父母患癌症的家庭随机分为干预组或对照组。干预持续3小时,包括(1)介绍,(2)心理教育(家庭中与癌症共存及社交网络支持的重要性),以及(3)讨论(该家庭对社会支持的需求)。主要结局指标为社会支持、心理健康和生活质量,次要结局指标为心理弹性和父母能力。在纳入研究时、3个月和6个月后,通过向与患癌伴侣共同生活的健康父母(60名)、家庭中一名8至18岁的孩子(60名)以及干预组家庭的社交网络成员(210名)发放一组问卷来收集数据。比较干预组(n = 30)和对照组(n = 30)之间的差异,功效分析表明P <.05且统计功效 =.80时将检测到具有临床意义的效应大小。

结果

本文介绍了癌症-PEPSON研究的方案,以更全面地了解该项目的背景和内容。该研究持续至2016年8月,预计首批结果将于2015年11月完成。

结论

据我们所知,这将是第一项通过为父母患癌症的家庭及其社交网络成员开展心理教育项目来优化社交网络支持的随机对照试验研究,同时也为社交网络支持提供了证据基础。研究结果可能会提供对临床实践和进一步研究有用的重要知识。该试验按照CONSORT清单进行报告。

临床试验

国际标准随机对照试验编号(ISRCTN):15982171;http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN15982171/15982171(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6cg9zunS0)

相似文献

1
Optimizing Social Network Support to Families Living With Parental Cancer: Research Protocol for the Cancer-PEPSONE Study.优化对父母患癌家庭的社交网络支持:癌症-PEPSONE研究的研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Dec 30;4(4):e142. doi: 10.2196/resprot.5055.
2
The Effects on Children's Anxiety and Quality of Life of a Psychoeducational Program for Families Living With Parental Cancer and Their Network: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study.父母癌症患者家庭及其网络的心理教育计划对儿童焦虑和生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验研究。
Cancer Nurs. 2018 Nov/Dec;41(6):473-483. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000529.
3
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
4
A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms in children at risk: evidence of parental and child change.一种基于家庭的方法预防有风险儿童的抑郁症状:父母和儿童变化的证据。
Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):e119-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.2.e119.
5
Effectiveness of a Technology-Based Supportive Educational Parenting Program on Parental Outcomes (Part 1): Randomized Controlled Trial.一项基于技术的支持性教育育儿项目对父母结果的有效性(第1部分):随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 13;21(2):e10816. doi: 10.2196/10816.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
8
Evaluation of two family-based intervention programs for children affected by rare disease and their families - research network (CARE-FAM-NET): study protocol for a rater-blinded, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial in a 2x2 factorial design.评价两种基于家庭的干预方案对罕见病患儿及其家庭的影响 - 研究网络(CARE-FAM-NET):一项在 2x2 析因设计中进行的盲法、随机、对照、多中心试验的研究方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Nov 20;21(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01312-9.
9
Guided Internet-Based Parent Training for Challenging Behavior in Children With Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (Strongest Families FASD): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于互联网的胎儿酒精谱系障碍儿童挑战行为家长指导培训(最强家庭FASD):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2015 Oct 13;4(4):e112. doi: 10.2196/resprot.4723.
10
Effectiveness of a Technology-Based Supportive Educational Parenting Program on Parental Outcomes in Singapore: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项基于技术的支持性教育育儿计划对新加坡父母育儿成果的有效性:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Jan 10;7(1):e4. doi: 10.2196/resprot.8062.

引用本文的文献

1
COVID-19 Concern and Stress in Bangladesh: Perceived Social Support as a Predictor or Protector.孟加拉国对新冠疫情的担忧与压力:感知到的社会支持作为一种预测因素或保护因素
Trends Psychol. 2022 Mar 1:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s43076-022-00158-7.
2
Relationship between perceived social support and mental health among Chinese college football athletes: a moderated mediation model.中国高校足球运动员感知社会支持与心理健康的关系:一个有调节的中介模型。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Oct 11;11(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01357-2.
3
Mobilising social support to improve mental health for children and adolescents: A systematic review using principles of realist synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Parenting changes in adults with cancer.患癌成年人的育儿变化。
Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;121(19):3551-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29525. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
2
Cancer caregiving predicts physical impairments: roles of earlier caregiving stress and being a spousal caregiver.癌症照护会导致身体损伤:早期照护压力和作为配偶照护者的角色的影响。
Cancer. 2015 Jan 15;121(2):302-10. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29040. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
3
Facilitating social support: member-leader communication in a breast cancer support group.促进社会支持:乳腺癌支持小组中的成员与领导者沟通
动员社会支持改善儿童和青少年心理健康:基于现实主义综合原理的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 May 20;16(5):e0251750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251750. eCollection 2021.
Cancer Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;37(1):E36-43. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182813829.
4
Effects of social support on physical activity, self-efficacy, and quality of life in adult cancer survivors and their caregivers.社会支持对成年癌症幸存者及其照顾者身体活动、自我效能感和生活质量的影响。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Sep;40(5):481-9. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.481-489.
5
Exploring the relationship between coping, social support and health-related quality of life for prostate cancer survivors: a review of the literature.探讨前列腺癌幸存者应对方式、社会支持与健康相关生活质量之间的关系:文献综述。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Dec;17(6):750-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 31.
6
Spouses' experience of caregiving for cancer patients: a literature review.配偶照顾癌症患者的体验:文献综述。
Int Nurs Rev. 2013 Jun;60(2):178-87. doi: 10.1111/inr.12000. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
7
Social networks, social support mechanisms, and quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis.社交网络、社会支持机制与乳腺癌诊断后的生活质量。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Jun;139(2):515-27. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2477-2. Epub 2013 May 9.
8
Use and need for psychosocial support in cancer patients: a population-based sample of patients with minor children.癌症患者对心理社会支持的使用和需求:有未成年子女的患者的基于人群样本。
Cancer. 2013 Jun 15;119(12):2333-41. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28021. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
9
When a parent has cancer: challenges to patients, their families and health providers.当父母一方患有癌症时:患者、他们的家庭和医疗保健提供者所面临的挑战。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2012 Dec;12(6):795-808. doi: 10.1586/erp.12.62.
10
Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施:医学研究理事会新指南
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):587-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.09.010. Epub 2012 Nov 15.