• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解医疗保险医院再入院率以及安全网医院与其他医院之间不同的处罚措施。

Understanding Medicare Hospital Readmission Rates And Differing Penalties Between Safety-Net And Other Hospitals.

作者信息

Sheingold Steven H, Zuckerman Rachael, Shartzer Adele

机构信息

Steven H. Sheingold (

Rachael Zuckerman is an economist in the Department of Health and Human Services.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jan;35(1):124-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0534.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0534
PMID:26733710
Abstract

Since the implementation of Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program in 2012, concerns have been raised about the effect its payment penalties for excess readmissions may have on safety-net hospitals. A number of policy solutions have been proposed to ensure that the program does not unfairly penalize safety-net institutions, which treat a disproportionate number of patients with low socioeconomic status. We examined the extent to which the program's current risk-adjustment factors, measures of patient socioeconomic status, and hospital-level factors explain the observed differences in readmission rates between safety-net and other hospitals. Our analyses suggest that patient socioeconomic status can explain some of the difference in readmission rates but that unmeasured factors such as hospitals' performance may also play a role. We also found that safety-net hospitals have experienced only slightly higher readmission penalties under the program than other hospitals have. Together, these findings suggest the need for a careful evaluation of policy alternatives that factor socioeconomic status into penalty calculations for excess readmissions to determine whether such alternatives could have a significant impact on penalties while remaining consistent with overall objectives for delivery system transformation.

摘要

自2012年医疗保险的医院再入院率降低计划实施以来,人们一直担心该计划对超额再入院的支付处罚可能会对安全网医院产生何种影响。已经提出了一些政策解决方案,以确保该计划不会不公平地惩罚安全网机构,这些机构治疗的社会经济地位较低的患者数量不成比例。我们研究了该计划当前的风险调整因素、患者社会经济地位指标以及医院层面因素在多大程度上解释了安全网医院和其他医院之间观察到的再入院率差异。我们的分析表明,患者的社会经济地位可以解释再入院率差异的一部分,但医院绩效等未衡量因素可能也起了作用。我们还发现,在该计划下,安全网医院受到的再入院处罚仅略高于其他医院。这些发现共同表明,需要仔细评估政策选择,即将社会经济地位纳入超额再入院处罚计算中,以确定这些选择是否会对处罚产生重大影响,同时又与交付系统转型的总体目标保持一致。

相似文献

1
Understanding Medicare Hospital Readmission Rates And Differing Penalties Between Safety-Net And Other Hospitals.了解医疗保险医院再入院率以及安全网医院与其他医院之间不同的处罚措施。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jan;35(1):124-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0534.
2
The Financial Effect of Value-Based Purchasing and the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program on Safety-Net Hospitals in 2014: A Cohort Study.2014 年基于价值的采购和医院再入院率降低计划对医疗救助医院的财务影响:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Sep 15;163(6):427-36. doi: 10.7326/M14-2813.
3
Opinions on the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program: results of a national survey of hospital leaders.关于医院再入院率降低计划的意见:医院领导全国性调查结果
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Aug 1;22(8):e287-94.
4
California safety-net hospitals likely to be penalized by ACA value, readmission, and meaningful-use programs.加利福尼亚州的安全网医院可能会因《平价医疗法案》的价值、再入院和有意义使用计划而受到处罚。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Aug;33(8):1314-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0138.
5
Adjusting for social risk factors impacts performance and penalties in the hospital readmissions reduction program.调整社会风险因素会影响医院再入院率降低计划的绩效和处罚。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):327-336. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13133.
6
Changes to Racial Disparities in Readmission Rates After Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Within Safety-Net and Non-Safety-Net Hospitals.医保医院再入院率削减计划实施后,医保安全网内和非安全网内医院入院率的种族差异变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184154. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4154.
7
Association of Stratification by Dual Enrollment Status With Financial Penalties in the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.双重入学身份分层与医院再入院率降低计划中的经济处罚的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Jun 1;179(6):769-776. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0117.
8
Luck of the draw: Role of chance in the assignment of medicare readmissions penalties.抽签运气:医疗保险再入院处罚分配中的机会作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0261363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261363. eCollection 2021.
9
Does It Pay to Penalize Hospitals for Excess Readmissions? Intended and Unintended Consequences of Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reductions Program.因超额再入院情况惩罚医院是否值得?医疗保险医院再入院率降低计划的预期与非预期后果。
Health Econ. 2017 Aug;26(8):1037-1051. doi: 10.1002/hec.3382. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
10
Higher readmissions at safety-net hospitals and potential policy solutions.安全网医院的再入院率较高及潜在的政策解决方案。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 Dec;34:1-16.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating Quantitative Data and Qualitative Insights to Understand 30-Day Readmission Rates: A Mixed-Methods Study.整合定量数据与定性见解以了解30天再入院率:一项混合方法研究。
Cureus. 2024 Oct 22;16(10):e72111. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72111. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Trends and Disparities in Ambulatory Follow-Up After Cardiovascular Hospitalizations : A Retrospective Cohort Study.心血管住院后门诊随访的趋势和差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Sep;177(9):1190-1198. doi: 10.7326/M23-3475. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
3
Social Risk and Dialysis Facility Performance in the First Year of the ESRD Treatment Choices Model.
社会风险与终末期肾病治疗选择模型实施首年的透析机构表现。
JAMA. 2024 Jan 9;331(2):124-131. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.23649.
4
Medicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program reduced fall-related health care use: An unexpected benefit?医疗保险的医院再入院率降低计划减少了与跌倒相关的医疗保健使用:意外之喜?
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14246. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14246. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
5
Hospital Performance Under Alternative Readmission Measures Incorporating Observation Stays.纳入观察期住院的替代再入院措施下的医院绩效
Med Care. 2023 Nov 1;61(11):779-786. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001920. Epub 2023 Sep 15.
6
Hospital value-based payment programs and disparity in the United States: A review of current evidence and future perspectives.美国基于价值的医院支付项目与差异:现有证据和未来展望的综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 10;10:882715. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.882715. eCollection 2022.
7
Social Risk Adjustment In The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: A Systematic Review And Implications For Policy.医院再入院率降低计划中的社会风险调整:系统评价及对政策的启示。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Sep;41(9):1307-1315. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00614.
8
Factors Associated With Disparities in Hospital Readmission Rates Among US Adults Dually Eligible for Medicare and Medicaid.美国医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格成年人住院再入院率差异相关因素。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jan 28;3(1):e214611. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4611. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Safety-net hospital performance under Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement.综合关节置换护理下的安全网医院绩效
Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb;58(1):101-106. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14042. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
10
Did the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Reduce Readmissions without Hurting Patient Outcomes at High Dual-Proportion Hospitals Prior to Stratification?在分层之前,医院再入院率降低计划是否降低了高双重比例医院的再入院率而没有损害患者的预后?
Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580211064836. doi: 10.1177/00469580211064836.