Sheingold Steven H, Zuckerman Rachael, Shartzer Adele
Steven H. Sheingold (
Rachael Zuckerman is an economist in the Department of Health and Human Services.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jan;35(1):124-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0534.
Since the implementation of Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program in 2012, concerns have been raised about the effect its payment penalties for excess readmissions may have on safety-net hospitals. A number of policy solutions have been proposed to ensure that the program does not unfairly penalize safety-net institutions, which treat a disproportionate number of patients with low socioeconomic status. We examined the extent to which the program's current risk-adjustment factors, measures of patient socioeconomic status, and hospital-level factors explain the observed differences in readmission rates between safety-net and other hospitals. Our analyses suggest that patient socioeconomic status can explain some of the difference in readmission rates but that unmeasured factors such as hospitals' performance may also play a role. We also found that safety-net hospitals have experienced only slightly higher readmission penalties under the program than other hospitals have. Together, these findings suggest the need for a careful evaluation of policy alternatives that factor socioeconomic status into penalty calculations for excess readmissions to determine whether such alternatives could have a significant impact on penalties while remaining consistent with overall objectives for delivery system transformation.
自2012年医疗保险的医院再入院率降低计划实施以来,人们一直担心该计划对超额再入院的支付处罚可能会对安全网医院产生何种影响。已经提出了一些政策解决方案,以确保该计划不会不公平地惩罚安全网机构,这些机构治疗的社会经济地位较低的患者数量不成比例。我们研究了该计划当前的风险调整因素、患者社会经济地位指标以及医院层面因素在多大程度上解释了安全网医院和其他医院之间观察到的再入院率差异。我们的分析表明,患者的社会经济地位可以解释再入院率差异的一部分,但医院绩效等未衡量因素可能也起了作用。我们还发现,在该计划下,安全网医院受到的再入院处罚仅略高于其他医院。这些发现共同表明,需要仔细评估政策选择,即将社会经济地位纳入超额再入院处罚计算中,以确定这些选择是否会对处罚产生重大影响,同时又与交付系统转型的总体目标保持一致。