Kafle Sumitra, Nath Navdeep
Worcestershire Royal Hospital.
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Nov 12;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204152.w1807. eCollection 2014.
Severe sepsis still remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, claiming between 36,000 to 64,000 lives annually in the UK, with a mortality rate of 35%.[1,2] The project aims to measure the management of severely septic patients in acute medical unit (AMU) in a district general hospital against best practice guidelines, before and after a set of interventions aiming to optimise patient management and outcomes. All new admissions who met the criteria for sepsis in AMU over a two week period were evaluated. Those who met the criteria for severe sepsis were further analysed. The criteria evaluated were time to first administration of oxygen, intravenous fluids, antibiotics, the taking of blood cultures, other relevant bloods tests (including lactate) and urine output monitoring. A re-audit was completed after the introduction of a set of interventions which included a "sepsis box." A total of 32 patients (19 Males, 13 Females) were identified in the pre-intervention group. Twenty-two of these patients met the criteria for severe sepsis. Only 15 out of 32 (47%) had their lactate measured. Ten out of 22 (45%) received fluids within an hour. Twelve out of 22 (55%) had their blood culture sample taken after administration of antibiotics and only 12 out of 22 (55%) had antibiotics administrated within an hour of medical assessment. Post-intervention the results however improved dramatically. A total of 30 patients were identified in the post-intervention group (12 Males, 18 Females). Antibiotics administration within an hour went up by 22%. Lactate was performed in 26/30 (87%) patients presented with sepsis compared to 47% in the pre-intervention group. Similarly, identification of severe sepsis, and administration of intravenous fluids also showed improvement ultimately improving patient safety. Following the initial success, the trial was repeated over three months period, which showed sustainable improvement.
严重脓毒症仍然是发病和死亡的主要原因,在英国每年导致36,000至64,000人死亡,死亡率为35%。[1,2] 该项目旨在对照最佳实践指南,衡量一家地区综合医院急性内科病房(AMU)中严重脓毒症患者在一系列旨在优化患者管理和预后的干预措施实施前后的管理情况。对在两周内符合AMU脓毒症标准的所有新入院患者进行评估。符合严重脓毒症标准的患者进一步分析。评估的标准包括首次给予氧气、静脉输液、抗生素的时间,采集血培养、其他相关血液检查(包括乳酸)以及尿量监测的时间。在引入包括“脓毒症急救箱”在内的一系列干预措施后完成了重新审核。干预前组共识别出32例患者(19例男性,13例女性)。其中22例患者符合严重脓毒症标准。32例中只有15例(47%)检测了乳酸。22例中有10例(45%)在1小时内接受了输液。22例中有12例(55%)在使用抗生素后采集了血培养样本,22例中只有12例(55%)在医疗评估后1小时内使用了抗生素。然而,干预后的结果有了显著改善。干预后组共识别出30例患者(12例男性,18例女性)。1小时内使用抗生素的比例上升了22%。脓毒症患者中26/30(87%)进行了乳酸检测,而干预前组为47%。同样,严重脓毒症的识别以及静脉输液的使用也有所改善,最终提高了患者安全性。在取得初步成功后,该试验在三个月内重复进行,结果显示有持续改善。