• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Seeking Sepsis in the Emergency Department- Identifying Barriers to Delivery of the Sepsis 6.在急诊科寻找脓毒症——识别实施脓毒症六步法的障碍
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 May 5;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206760.w3983. eCollection 2016.
2
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
3
A collaborative improvement project by an NHS Emergency Department and Scottish Ambulance Paramedics to improve the identification and delivery of sepsis 6.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)急诊科与苏格兰救护服务机构护理人员开展的一项合作改进项目,旨在改善脓毒症“六步法”的识别与实施。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Sep 28;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u212670.w5049. eCollection 2016.
4
Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the 'Sepsis Six' recommendations.通过实施“脓毒症六步法”建议改善地区综合医院的脓毒症管理。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Sep 9;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u207871.w4032. eCollection 2015.
5
A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department.一项旨在改善急诊科早期脓毒症护理的质量改进项目。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):787-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003552. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
6
The epidemiology of adults with severe sepsis and septic shock in Scottish emergency departments.苏格兰急诊科成人严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的流行病学。
Emerg Med J. 2013 May;30(5):397-401. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201361. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
7
Promoting Antibiotic Stewardship and Implementation of Sepsis Pathway in the Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Initiative.在急诊科促进抗生素管理及脓毒症治疗流程的实施:一项质量改进计划
Cureus. 2023 Nov 23;15(11):e49275. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49275. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Impact of nurse-initiated ED sepsis protocol on compliance with sepsis bundles, time to initial antibiotic administration, and in-hospital mortality.护士启动的急诊科脓毒症治疗方案对脓毒症集束化治疗的依从性、首次使用抗生素的时间及住院死亡率的影响。
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Mar;41(2):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
9
Mortality rate among patients with septic shock after implementation of 6-hour sepsis protocol in the emergency department of Thammasat University Hospital.泰国国立法政大学医院急诊科实施6小时脓毒症治疗方案后脓毒性休克患者的死亡率
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Aug;97 Suppl 8:S182-93.
10
Implementing the severe sepsis care bundles outside the ICU by outreach.通过外展服务在重症监护病房之外实施严重脓毒症护理集束化措施。
Nurs Crit Care. 2007 Sep-Oct;12(5):225-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2007.00242.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators Affecting the Implementation of the Sepsis Six Protocol by Nurses in Acute Care Settings in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study.约旦急性护理环境中护士实施脓毒症六步法方案的障碍与促进因素:一项横断面研究
SAGE Open Nurs. 2025 Jul 20;11:23779608251362276. doi: 10.1177/23779608251362276. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Development and Piloting of Implementation Strategies to Support Delivery of a Clinical Intervention for Postpartum Hemorrhage in Four sub-Saharan Africa Countries.制定并试行实施策略,以支持在撒哈拉以南非洲的四个国家提供产后出血临床干预措施。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2024 Oct 29;12(5). doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-23-00387.
3
The Predictors of Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Applying Sepsis Six Guidelines Among Critical Care Nurses.重症监护护士应用脓毒症六项指南时感知到的障碍和促进因素的预测因素
Cureus. 2024 Mar 31;16(3):e57355. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57355. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Early sepsis care with the National Early Warning Score 2-guided Sepsis Hour-1 Bundle in the emergency department: hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pilot stepped wedge randomised controlled trial (NEWS-1 TRIPS) protocol.急诊科应用国家早期预警评分 2 指导的脓毒症 1 小时bundle 进行早期脓毒症护理:混合 1 型有效性实施试点阶梯式随机对照试验(NEWS-1 TRIPS)方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 1;14(2):e080676. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080676.
5
The impact of changes in coding on mortality reports using the example of sepsis.以脓毒症为例探讨编码变更对死亡率报告的影响。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 1;22(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01947-x.
6
The Clinical Need for New Diagnostics in the Identification and Management of Patients with Suspected Sepsis in UK NHS Hospitals: A Survey of Healthcare Professionals.英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)医院中疑似脓毒症患者识别与管理方面新型诊断方法的临床需求:医疗专业人员调查
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Oct 26;9(11):737. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9110737.
7
A Snapshot of Compliance with the Sepsis Six Care Bundle in Two Acute Hospitals in the West Midlands, UK.英国西米德兰兹郡两家急症医院对脓毒症“六件套”护理包的依从情况快照
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;23(7):310-315. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23204.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the 'Sepsis Six' recommendations.通过实施“脓毒症六步法”建议改善地区综合医院的脓毒症管理。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Sep 9;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u207871.w4032. eCollection 2015.
2
Improving management of severe sepsis and uptake of sepsis resuscitation bundle in an acute setting.在急性环境中改善严重脓毒症的管理及脓毒症复苏集束治疗的应用。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Nov 12;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204152.w1807. eCollection 2014.
3
Improving Sepsis Management in the Acute Admissions Unit.改善急性入院病房的脓毒症管理
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Aug 27;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204974.w2091. eCollection 2014.
4
Early goal-directed therapy vs usual care in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.早期目标导向治疗与常规治疗在严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克治疗中的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;10(6):731-43. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1248-y. Epub 2015 May 16.
5
Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock.早期目标导向性复苏治疗脓毒性休克的试验。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1301-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500896. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
6
The effect of goal-directed therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis - earlier is better: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.目标导向治疗对脓毒症患者死亡率的影响——越早越好:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2014 Oct 20;18(5):570. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0570-5.
7
Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock.目标导向性复苏治疗早期感染性休克患者。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1496-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404380. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
8
A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock.一项基于方案的早期脓毒性休克护理的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
9
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
10
Lower mortality in sepsis patients admitted through the ED vs direct admission.在急诊科就诊的脓毒症患者的死亡率低于直接入院的患者。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Mar;30(3):432-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Feb 26.

在急诊科寻找脓毒症——识别实施脓毒症六步法的障碍

Seeking Sepsis in the Emergency Department- Identifying Barriers to Delivery of the Sepsis 6.

作者信息

Bentley James, Henderson Susan, Thakore Shobhan, Donald Michael, Wang Weijie

机构信息

NHS Tayside.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 May 5;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206760.w3983. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1136/bmjquality.u206760.w3983
PMID:27239303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4863434/
Abstract

The Sepsis 6 is an internationally accepted management bundle that, when initiated within one hour of identifying sepsis, can reduce morbidity and mortality. This management bundle was advocated by the Scottish Patient Safety Programme as part of its Acute Adult campaign launched in 2008 and adopted by NHS Tayside in 2012. Despite this, the Emergency Department (ED) of Ninewells Hospital, a tertiary referral centre and major teaching hospital in Scotland, was displaying poor success in the Sepsis 6. We therefore set out to improve compliance by evaluating the application of all aspects of the NHS Tayside Sepsis 6 bundle within one hour of ED triage time, to identify what human factors may influence achieving the one hour The Sepsis 6 bundle. This allowed us to tailor a number of specific interventions including educational sessions, regular audit and personal feedback and check list Sepsis 6 sticker. These interventions promoted a steady increase in compliance from an initial rate of 51.0% to 74.3%. The project highlighted that undifferentiated patients create a challenge in initiating the Sepsis 6. Pyrexia is a key human factor-trigger for recognising sepsis with initial nursing assessment being vital in recognition and identifying the best area (resus) of the department to manage severely septic patients. EDs need to recognise these challenges and develop educational and feedback plans for staff and utilise available resources to maximise the Sepsis 6 compliance.

摘要

“脓毒症六步法”是一项国际公认的管理集束方案,在识别脓毒症后一小时内启动该方案,可降低发病率和死亡率。该管理集束方案由苏格兰患者安全计划倡导,作为其2008年发起的成人急症运动的一部分,并于2012年被泰赛德国民保健服务信托基金采用。尽管如此,作为苏格兰的三级转诊中心和主要教学医院,九井医院急诊科在实施“脓毒症六步法”方面成效不佳。因此,我们着手通过评估泰赛德国民保健服务信托基金“脓毒症六步法”集束方案在急诊科分诊时间一小时内各方面的应用情况来提高依从性,以确定哪些人为因素可能影响在一小时内完成“脓毒症六步法”集束方案。这使我们能够制定一系列具体干预措施,包括教育课程、定期审核、个人反馈以及“脓毒症六步法”检查表贴纸。这些干预措施促使依从率从最初的51.0%稳步提高到74.3%。该项目强调,未分化患者在启动“脓毒症六步法”时带来了挑战。发热是识别脓毒症的关键人为因素触发点,初始护理评估对于识别脓毒症以及确定科室中管理严重脓毒症患者的最佳区域(复苏区)至关重要。急诊科需要认识到这些挑战,为工作人员制定教育和反馈计划,并利用可用资源最大限度地提高“脓毒症六步法”的依从性。