• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过实施“脓毒症六步法”建议改善地区综合医院的脓毒症管理。

Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the 'Sepsis Six' recommendations.

作者信息

Kumar Prashant, Jordan Mark, Caesar Jenny, Miller Sarah

机构信息

South Canterbury DHB, New Zealand.

出版信息

BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Sep 9;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u207871.w4032. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1136/bmjquality.u207871.w4032
PMID:26734403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4693057/
Abstract

Sepsis is a common condition with a major global impact on healthcare resources and expenditure. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign has been vigorous in promoting internationally recognised pathways to improve the management of septic patients and decrease mortality. However, translating recommendations into practice is a challenging and complex task that requires a multi-faceted approach with sustained engagement from local stakeholders. Whilst working at a district general hospital in New Zealand, we were concerned by the seemingly inconsistent management of septic patients, often leading to long delays in the initiation of life-saving measures such as antibiotic, fluid, and oxygen administration. In our hospital there were no clear systems, protocols or guidelines in place for identifying and managing septic patients. We therefore launched the Sepsis Six resuscitation bundle of care in our hospital in an attempt to raise awareness amongst staff and improve the management of septic patients. We introduced a number of simple low-cost interventions that included educational sessions for junior doctors and nursing staff, as well as posters and modifications to phlebotomy trolleys that acted as visual reminders to implement the Sepsis Six bundle. Overall, we found there to a be a steady improvement in the delivery of the Sepsis Six bundle in septic patients with 63% of patients receiving appropriate care within one hour, compared to 29% prior to our interventions. However this did not translate to an improvement in patient mortality. This project forms part of an on going process to instigate a fundamental culture change among local healthcare professionals regarding the management of sepsis. Whilst we have demonstrated improved implementation of the Sepsis Six bundle, the key challenge remains to ensure that momentum of this project continues and forms a platform for sustainable clinical improvement in the long term.

摘要

脓毒症是一种常见病症,对全球医疗资源和支出产生重大影响。拯救脓毒症运动一直在积极推广国际认可的途径,以改善脓毒症患者的管理并降低死亡率。然而,将建议转化为实践是一项具有挑战性和复杂性的任务,需要采取多方面的方法,并持续让当地利益相关者参与其中。在新西兰一家地区综合医院工作时,我们对脓毒症患者看似不一致的管理感到担忧,这常常导致在启动抗生素、补液和输氧等救命措施方面出现长时间延误。在我们医院,没有明确的系统、方案或指南来识别和管理脓毒症患者。因此,我们在医院推出了脓毒症六步复苏护理包,试图提高工作人员的意识并改善脓毒症患者的管理。我们引入了一些简单且低成本的干预措施,包括为初级医生和护理人员举办教育课程,以及在采血推车上张贴海报并进行改进,以此作为实施脓毒症六步护理包的视觉提醒。总体而言,我们发现脓毒症患者接受脓毒症六步护理包的情况有稳步改善,63%的患者在一小时内得到了适当护理,而在我们干预之前这一比例为29%。然而,这并没有转化为患者死亡率的改善。该项目是正在进行的一个过程的一部分,旨在促使当地医疗专业人员在脓毒症管理方面实现根本性的文化变革。虽然我们已经证明脓毒症六步护理包的实施有所改善,但关键挑战仍然是确保该项目的势头持续下去,并形成一个长期实现可持续临床改善的平台。

相似文献

1
Improving the management of sepsis in a district general hospital by implementing the 'Sepsis Six' recommendations.通过实施“脓毒症六步法”建议改善地区综合医院的脓毒症管理。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Sep 9;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u207871.w4032. eCollection 2015.
2
Improving door-to-needle times for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction at a rural district general hospital.改善农村地区综合医院ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的门-针时间。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 Dec 19;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u209049.w6736. eCollection 2016.
3
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
4
Improving Sepsis Management in the Acute Admissions Unit.改善急性入院病房的脓毒症管理
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Aug 27;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204974.w2091. eCollection 2014.
5
Mortality rate among patients with septic shock after implementation of 6-hour sepsis protocol in the emergency department of Thammasat University Hospital.泰国国立法政大学医院急诊科实施6小时脓毒症治疗方案后脓毒性休克患者的死亡率
J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Aug;97 Suppl 8:S182-93.
6
Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.西班牙一项多中心严重脓毒症教育项目实施后护理过程及结局的改善
JAMA. 2008 May 21;299(19):2294-303. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.19.2294.
7
The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study.脓毒症 6 小时集束化治疗和严重脓毒症复苏集束化治疗:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Emerg Med J. 2011 Jun;28(6):507-12. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.095067. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
8
A complex endeavour: an ethnographic study of the implementation of the Sepsis Six clinical care bundle.一项复杂的工作:对脓毒症六联临床护理集束方案实施情况的人种志研究
Implement Sci. 2016 Nov 16;11(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0518-z.
9
Seeking Sepsis in the Emergency Department- Identifying Barriers to Delivery of the Sepsis 6.在急诊科寻找脓毒症——识别实施脓毒症六步法的障碍
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 May 5;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206760.w3983. eCollection 2016.
10
An audit of compliance with the sepsis resuscitation care bundle in patients admitted to A&E with severe sepsis or septic shock.对因严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克入住急诊科的患者进行脓毒症复苏护理集束方案依从性审计。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2008 Oct;16(4):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.05.008. Epub 2008 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Coordinated and Multidisciplinary Strategy can Reduce the Time for Antibiotics in Septic Patients at a University Hospital.一项协调一致的多学科策略可缩短大学医院脓毒症患者使用抗生素的时间。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Jul;27(7):465-469. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24483.
2
A state-wide implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis pathway with a mortality based cost-effectiveness analysis from a healthcare sector perspective.从医疗保健部门的角度出发,在全州范围内实施基于死亡率的成本效益分析的全院脓毒症治疗路径。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 May 19;3(5):e0000687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000687. eCollection 2023.
3
Time-to-antibiotics and clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a prospective nationwide multicenter cohort study.抗生素使用时间与脓毒症和感染性休克患者临床结局的相关性:一项前瞻性全国多中心队列研究。
Crit Care. 2022 Jan 13;26(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03883-0.
4
A Snapshot of Compliance with the Sepsis Six Care Bundle in Two Acute Hospitals in the West Midlands, UK.英国西米德兰兹郡两家急症医院对脓毒症“六件套”护理包的依从情况快照
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jul;23(7):310-315. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23204.
5
Antibiotic- and Fluid-Focused Bundles Potentially Improve Sepsis Management, but High-Quality Evidence Is Lacking for the Specificity Required in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Service's Sepsis Bundle (SEP-1).抗生素和液体治疗为重点的捆绑治疗方案可能会改善脓毒症的管理,但医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的脓毒症捆绑治疗方案(SEP-1)所需的具体内容缺乏高质量证据。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct;47(10):1290-1300. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003892.
6
Successful prospective quality improvement programme for the identification and management of patients at risk of sepsis in hospital.
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jun 12;8(2):e000369. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000369. eCollection 2019.
7
Managing sepsis: Electronic recognition, rapid response teams, and standardized care save lives.脓毒症的管理:电子识别、快速反应团队和标准化护理可挽救生命。
J Crit Care. 2017 Aug;40:296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
8
Promoting early identification of sepsis in hospitalized patients with nurse-led protocols.通过护士主导的方案促进住院患者脓毒症的早期识别。
Crit Care. 2017 Jan 11;21(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1590-0.
9
Seeking Sepsis in the Emergency Department- Identifying Barriers to Delivery of the Sepsis 6.在急诊科寻找脓毒症——识别实施脓毒症六步法的障碍
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016 May 5;5(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u206760.w3983. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving management of severe sepsis and uptake of sepsis resuscitation bundle in an acute setting.在急性环境中改善严重脓毒症的管理及脓毒症复苏集束治疗的应用。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Nov 12;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204152.w1807. eCollection 2014.
2
Improving Sepsis Management in the Acute Admissions Unit.改善急性入院病房的脓毒症管理
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Aug 27;3(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204974.w2091. eCollection 2014.
3
Improving time to antibiotics and implementing the "Sepsis 6".缩短使用抗生素的时间并实施“脓毒症六步法”。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2014 Jan 14;2(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u202548.w1443. eCollection 2014.
4
Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock.目标导向性复苏治疗早期感染性休克患者。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1496-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404380. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
5
A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock.一项基于方案的早期脓毒性休克护理的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1683-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401602. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
6
A multifaceted intervention to improve sepsis management in general hospital wards with evaluation using segmented regression of interrupted time series.采用分段回归中断时间序列评估方法改善综合医院病房脓毒症管理的多方面干预。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec;23(12):e2. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002176.
7
The epidemiology of septic shock in French intensive care units: the prospective multicenter cohort EPISS study.法国重症监护病房感染性休克的流行病学:前瞻性多中心队列EPISS研究
Crit Care. 2013 Apr 25;17(2):R65. doi: 10.1186/cc12598.
8
Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States.美国严重脓毒症发病率和死亡率的基准研究。
Crit Care Med. 2013 May;41(5):1167-74. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827c09f8.
9
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.拯救脓毒症运动:严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2012 年。
Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af.
10
Assessing available information on the burden of sepsis: global estimates of incidence, prevalence and mortality.评估脓毒症负担的现有信息:发病率、患病率和死亡率的全球估计数。
J Glob Health. 2012 Jun;2(1):010404. doi: 10.7189/jogh.02.010404.