Kingston N G
Br Vet J. 1989 Jul-Aug;145(4):312-20. doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(89)90028-6.
Investment in the facilities for pig production is subject to the same criteria used for any other business. Until the early 1980s pig farmers were free to choose whatever housing system they considered would give them the best economic return. Now, however, other considerations have to be taken into account, particularly the welfare of the animal and the exclusion of antibiotics in the finishing feed. In terms of welfare, the tethering and stalling of sows has resulted in the development of electronically controlled systems for feeding dry sows. In the fattening herd the pressure for economic performance, where the nett margin per pig sold in real terms has not altered in 15 years, means that systems such as flatdecks and totally slatted houses which give the most consistent food conversion efficiency (FCE) and growth rate are favoured. Slatted fattening systems are the easiest to adapt to weekly modules of production which limits disease spread between batches and reduces the requirement for medication.
对生猪生产设施的投资需遵循与其他任何业务相同的标准。直到20世纪80年代初,养猪户可以自由选择他们认为能带来最佳经济回报的任何养殖系统。然而,现在必须考虑其他因素,特别是动物福利和育肥饲料中抗生素的禁用。在福利方面,母猪的拴系和限位饲养导致了电子控制的干母猪饲喂系统的发展。在育肥猪群中,由于经济效益的压力(按实际销售每头猪的净利润在15年里没有变化),意味着诸如平层栏舍和全漏缝地板猪舍等能提供最稳定的食物转化率(FCE)和生长速度的系统更受青睐。漏缝地板育肥系统最容易适应每周一批的生产模式,这限制了批次间疾病的传播并减少了用药需求。