• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对RMSEA两种非正态性校正的样本性能研究。

An Investigation of the Sample Performance of Two Nonnormality Corrections for RMSEA.

作者信息

Brosseau-Liard Patricia E, Savalei Victoria, Li Libo

机构信息

a University of British Columbia.

b University of California Los Angeles.

出版信息

Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Nov;47(6):904-30. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715252.

DOI:10.1080/00273171.2012.715252
PMID:26735008
Abstract

The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) is a popular fit index in structural equation modeling (SEM). Typically, RMSEA is computed using the normal theory maximum likelihood (ML) fit function. Under nonnormality, the uncorrected sample estimate of the ML RMSEA tends to be inflated. Two robust corrections to the sample ML RMSEA have been proposed, but the theoretical and empirical differences between the 2 have not been explored. In this article, we investigate the behavior of these 2 corrections. We show that the virtually unknown correction due to Li and Bentler (2006) , which we label the sample-corrected robust RMSEA, is a consistent estimate of the population ML RMSEA yet drastically reduces bias due to nonnormality in small samples. On the other hand, the popular correction implemented in several SEM programs, which we label the population-corrected robust RMSEA, has poor properties because it estimates a quantity that decreases with increasing nonnormality. We recommend the use of the sample-corrected RMSEA with nonnormal data and its wide implementation.

摘要

近似均方根误差(RMSEA)是结构方程模型(SEM)中一种常用的拟合指数。通常,RMSEA是使用正态理论极大似然(ML)拟合函数来计算的。在非正态情况下,ML RMSEA的未校正样本估计往往会被夸大。针对样本ML RMSEA已经提出了两种稳健校正方法,但尚未探究这两种方法在理论和实证方面的差异。在本文中,我们研究了这两种校正方法的表现。我们表明,Li和Bentler(2006)提出的几乎不为人知的校正方法(我们将其标记为样本校正稳健RMSEA)是总体ML RMSEA的一致估计,并且在小样本中能极大地减少非正态导致的偏差。另一方面,在几个SEM程序中实现的常用校正方法(我们将其标记为总体校正稳健RMSEA)具有较差的性质,因为它估计的量会随着非正态性的增加而减小。我们建议在非正态数据中使用样本校正RMSEA并广泛应用它。

相似文献

1
An Investigation of the Sample Performance of Two Nonnormality Corrections for RMSEA.对RMSEA两种非正态性校正的样本性能研究。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Nov;47(6):904-30. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715252.
2
On the Computation of the RMSEA and CFI from the Mean-And-Variance Corrected Test Statistic with Nonnormal Data in SEM.在 SEM 中,使用非正态数据的均值和方差校正的检验统计量计算 RMSEA 和 CFI。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 May-Jun;53(3):419-429. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2018.1455142. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
3
Adjusting Incremental Fit Indices for Nonnormality.针对非正态性调整增量拟合指数。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;49(5):460-70. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2014.933697.
4
Asymptotics of AIC, BIC, and RMSEA for Model Selection in Structural Equation Modeling.结构方程模型中模型选择的 AIC、BIC 和 RMSEA 的渐近性。
Psychometrika. 2017 Jun;82(2):407-426. doi: 10.1007/s11336-017-9572-y. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
5
New computations for RMSEA and CFI following FIML and TS estimation with missing data.在采用全信息极大似然估计(FIML)和加权最小二乘均值和方差调整估计(TS)对缺失数据进行估计之后,对近似误差均方根(RMSEA)和比较拟合指数(CFI)进行的新计算。
Psychol Methods. 2023 Apr;28(2):263-283. doi: 10.1037/met0000445. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
6
The effect of latent and error non-normality on corrections to the test statistic in structural equation modeling.潜在和误差非正态性对结构方程建模中检验统计量校正的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Oct;54(5):2351-2363. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01729-9. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
7
Abstract: Evaluation of Test Statistics for Robust Structural Equation Modeling With Nonnormal Missing Data.摘要:具有非正态缺失数据的稳健结构方程模型的检验统计量评估
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 Nov 30;46(6):1016. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.636715.
8
Empirically Corrected Rescaled Statistics for SEM with Small N and Large p.小样本大 p 结构方程模型的经验校正重标统计量
Multivariate Behav Res. 2017 Nov-Dec;52(6):673-698. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2017.1354759. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
9
The Problem with Having Two Watches: Assessment of Fit When RMSEA and CFI Disagree.拥有两块手表的问题:当RMSEA和CFI出现分歧时拟合度的评估
Multivariate Behav Res. 2016 Mar-Jun;51(2-3):220-39. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1134306. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
10
Accuracy in Parameter Estimation for the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: Sample Size Planning for Narrow Confidence Intervals.近似均方根误差参数估计的准确性:窄置信区间的样本量规划。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 Feb 7;46(1):1-32. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.543027.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric re-evaluation of the German version of the Physicians' Reaction to Uncertainty Scale.《德国版医生对不确定性反应量表》的心理测量学重新评估
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 6;16:1552177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1552177. eCollection 2025.
2
The simulation-cum-ROC approach: A new approach to generate tailored cutoffs for fit indices through simulation and ROC analysis.模拟与ROC方法:一种通过模拟和ROC分析为拟合指数生成定制临界值的新方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Apr 1;57(5):135. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02638-x.
3
Predicting speech-in-noise ability with static and dynamic auditory figure-ground analysis using structural equation modelling.
使用结构方程模型,通过静态和动态听觉背景分离分析预测噪声环境下的言语能力。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Mar;292(2042):20242503. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2503. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
4
Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Sex of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool Symptom Inventory.运动性脑震荡评估工具症状清单的因子结构及跨性别的测量不变性
Clin J Sport Med. 2024 Nov 26. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001301.
5
Factor Structure and Validity of Composite Scores Resulting From a Computerized Cognitive Test Battery in Healthy Adults and Patients With Primary Brain Tumors.健康成年人和原发性脑肿瘤患者使用计算机化认知测试组合得出的综合分数的因子结构与效度
Assessment. 2024 Nov 20;32(7):10731911241289987. doi: 10.1177/10731911241289987.
6
Binge drinking trajectories across adolescence and early adulthood: Associations with genetic influences for dual-systems impulsive personality traits, alcohol consumption, and alcohol use disorder.青少年期和成年早期的暴饮轨迹:与双系统冲动型人格特质、饮酒量及酒精使用障碍的遗传影响的关联
medRxiv. 2024 Oct 16:2024.10.15.24315471. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.15.24315471.
7
Putting the Vicious Cycle to the Test: Evidence for the Cognitive Behavioral Model of Persistent Somatic Symptoms From an Online Study.将恶性循环付诸检验:在线研究对持续性躯体症状的认知行为模型的证据。
Psychosom Med. 2024;86(6):569-575. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001313. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
8
Evidence of validity and reliability of the controlling motivational style questionnaire in the work context.工作环境中控制型激励风格问卷的有效性和可靠性证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 2;10(3):e25478. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25478. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
9
Validation and personality conditionings of the 3 × 2 achievement goal model in sport.运动领域 3×2 成就目标模型的验证和人格条件作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 18;14(1):1588. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52075-7.
10
Competitive integrated employment for youth with disabilities: Aligning measurement with conceptualization using latent growth curve modeling.残疾青年的竞争性综合就业:使用潜在增长曲线模型使测量与概念化保持一致。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0290573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290573. eCollection 2023.