Prussing Erica, Newbury Elizabeth
University of Iowa, USA.
University of Iowa, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;150:57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
In 2012-13 the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) in New Zealand rapidly implemented a major restructuring of national scientific research funding. The "National Science Challenges" (NSC) initiative aims to promote greater commercial applications of scientific knowledge, reflecting ongoing neoliberal reforms in New Zealand. Using the example of health research, we examine the NSC as a key moment in ongoing indigenous Māori advocacy against neoliberalization. NSC rhetoric and practice through 2013 moved to marginalize participation by Māori researchers, in part through constructing "Māori" and "science" as essentially separate arenas-yet at the same time appeared to recognize and value culturally distinctive forms of Māori knowledge. To contest this "neoliberal multiculturalism," Māori health researchers reasserted the validity of culturally distinctive knowledge, strategically appropriated NSC rhetoric, and marshalled political resources to protect Māori research infrastructure. By foregrounding scientific knowledge production as an arena of contestation over neoliberal values and priorities, and attending closely to how neoliberalizing tactics can include moves to acknowledge cultural diversity, this analysis poses new questions for social scientific study of global trends toward reconfiguring the production of knowledge about health. Study findings are drawn from textual analysis of MBIE documents about the NSC from 2012 to 2014, materials circulated by Māori researchers in the blogosphere in 2014, and ethnographic interviews conducted in 2013 with 17 Māori health researchers working at 7 sites that included university-based research centers, government agencies, and independent consultancies.
2012 - 2013年,新西兰商业、创新与就业部(MBIE)迅速对国家科研资金进行了重大重组。“国家科学挑战”(NSC)倡议旨在推动科学知识的更多商业应用,这反映了新西兰正在进行的新自由主义改革。以健康研究为例,我们将NSC视为毛利人持续反对新自由主义化的关键时刻进行考察。到2013年,NSC的言辞和做法将毛利研究人员的参与边缘化,部分原因是将“毛利”和“科学”构建为本质上相互分离的领域,但与此同时,似乎又认可并重视毛利文化独特形式的知识。为了对抗这种“新自由主义多元文化主义”,毛利健康研究人员重申了文化独特知识的有效性,策略性地运用了NSC的言辞,并调集政治资源来保护毛利研究基础设施。通过将科学知识生产作为对新自由主义价值观和优先事项的争论领域,并密切关注新自由主义策略如何包括承认文化多样性的举措,这一分析为关于健康知识生产重构的全球趋势的社会科学研究提出了新问题。研究结果来自对2012年至2014年MBIE关于NSC的文件的文本分析、2014年毛利研究人员在博客圈发布的材料,以及2013年对在7个地点工作的17名毛利健康研究人员进行的人种志访谈,这些地点包括大学研究中心、政府机构和独立咨询公司。