Suppr超能文献

远程缺血预处理对冠状动脉手术诱导的血小板活化的影响。

Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Platelet Activation Induced by Coronary Procedures.

作者信息

Lanza Gaetano Antonio, Stazi Alessandra, Villano Angelo, Torrini Flavia, Milo Maria, Laurito Marianna, Flego Davide, Aurigemma Cristina, Liuzzo Giovanna, Crea Filippo

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Institute of Cardiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Institute of Cardiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;117(3):359-65. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.056. Epub 2015 Nov 18.

Abstract

In this study, we aim to assess whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces platelet activation during coronary angiography (CA) and/or percutaneous coronary interventions. We studied 30 patients who underwent CA because of a suspect of stable angina. Patients were randomized to RIPC (3 short episodes of forearm ischemia) or sham RIPC (controls) before the procedure. Blood samples were collected at baseline, at the end of the procedure, and 24 hours later. Monocyte-platelet aggregate (MPA) formation and platelet CD41 in the MPA gate and CD41 and CD62 expression in the platelet gate were assessed by flow cytometry, in the absence and in the presence of adenosine diphosphate (ADP) stimulation. A significant increase in platelet activation occurred during the invasive procedure in controls, which persisted at 24 hours. However, compared with controls, RIPC group showed no or a lower increase in platelet variables, including MPA formation (p <0.0001) and CD41 (p = 0.002) in the MPA gate and CD41 (p <0.0001) and CD62 (p = 0.002) in the platelet gate. ADP increased platelet activation at baseline, but did not further increase platelet reactivity during the invasive procedure in either groups. Percutaneous coronary interventions, performed in 10 patients (6 in the RIPC group and 4 in controls), did not have any further significant effect on platelet activation and reactivity compared with CA alone. In conclusion, RIPC reduces platelet activation occurring during CA. In contrast, no effects were observed on platelet response to ADP stimulation, probably related to the administration of an ADP antagonist in all patients.

摘要

在本研究中,我们旨在评估远程缺血预处理(RIPC)是否能在冠状动脉造影(CA)和/或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间降低血小板活化。我们研究了30例因疑似稳定型心绞痛而接受CA的患者。在手术前,患者被随机分为RIPC组(3次短暂的前臂缺血发作)或假RIPC组(对照组)。在基线、手术结束时和24小时后采集血样。通过流式细胞术在有无二磷酸腺苷(ADP)刺激的情况下,评估单核细胞 - 血小板聚集体(MPA)的形成以及MPA门控中的血小板CD41和血小板门控中的CD41及CD62表达。在对照组的侵入性操作期间,血小板活化显著增加,并持续至24小时。然而,与对照组相比,RIPC组的血小板变量增加不明显或较低,包括MPA门控中的MPA形成(p <0.0001)和CD41(p = 0.002)以及血小板门控中的CD41(p <0.0001)和CD62(p = 0.002)。ADP在基线时增加血小板活化,但在两组的侵入性操作期间均未进一步增加血小板反应性。10例患者(RIPC组6例,对照组4例)接受了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,与单纯CA相比,对血小板活化和反应性没有任何进一步的显著影响。总之,RIPC可降低CA期间发生的血小板活化。相比之下,未观察到对血小板对ADP刺激反应的影响,这可能与所有患者均使用ADP拮抗剂有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验