Lau Jerrett K, Pennings Gabrielle J, Reddel Caroline J, Campbell Heather, Liang Hai Po H, Traini Mathew, Gardiner Elizabeth E, Yong Andy S, Chen Vivien M, Kritharides Leonard
Department of Cardiology, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, NSW, Australia.
ANZAC Research Institute, University of Sydney, Concord, NSW, Australia.
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 May;18(5):1221-1232. doi: 10.1111/jth.14763. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
We investigated whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) inhibits agonist-induced conformational activation of platelet α β in patients with coronary artery disease already receiving conventional antiplatelet therapy.
PATIENTS/METHODS: Consecutive patients with angiographically confirmed coronary artery disease were randomized to RIPC or sham treatment. Venous blood was collected before and immediately after RIPC/sham. Platelet aggregometry (ADP, arachidonic acid) and whole blood platelet flow cytometry was performed for CD62P, CD63, active α β (PAC-1 binding) before and after stimulation with ADP, thrombin ± collagen, or PAR-1 thrombin receptor agonist.
Patients (25 RIPC, 23 sham) were well matched, 83% male, age (mean ± standard deviation) 63.3 ± 13.2 years, 95% aspirin, 81% P2Y inhibitor. RIPC did not affect platelet aggregation, nor agonist-induced expression of CD62P, but selectively and significantly decreased α β activation after stimulation with either PAR-1 agonist peptide or the combination of thrombin + collagen, but not after ADP nor thrombin alone. The effect of RIPC on platelet α β activation was evident in patients receiving both aspirin and P2Y inhibitor, and was not associated with an increase in vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation.
Remote ischemic preconditioning inhibits conformational activation of platelet α β in response to exposure to thrombin and collagen in patients with coronary artery disease receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. These findings indicate agonist-specific inhibition of platelet activation by RIPC in coronary artery disease that is not obviated by the prior use of P2Y inhibitors.
我们研究了远程缺血预处理(RIPC)是否能抑制已接受传统抗血小板治疗的冠心病患者中激动剂诱导的血小板αⅡbβ3构象激活。
患者/方法:将血管造影确诊的冠心病连续患者随机分为RIPC组或假治疗组。在RIPC/假治疗前及治疗后立即采集静脉血。在使用ADP、凝血酶±胶原蛋白或PAR-1凝血酶受体激动剂刺激前后,进行血小板聚集试验(ADP、花生四烯酸)以及全血血小板流式细胞术检测CD62P、CD63、活性αⅡbβ(PAC-1结合)。
患者(25例RIPC组,23例假治疗组)匹配良好,83%为男性,年龄(均值±标准差)63.3±13.2岁,95%服用阿司匹林,81%服用P2Y抑制剂。RIPC不影响血小板聚集,也不影响激动剂诱导的CD62P表达,但在用PAR-1激动剂肽或凝血酶+胶原蛋白联合刺激后,能选择性且显著降低αⅡbβ3激活,而在单独使用ADP或凝血酶刺激后则无此作用。RIPC对血小板αⅡbβ3激活的作用在同时服用阿司匹林和P2Y抑制剂的患者中明显,且与血管扩张剂刺激的磷蛋白磷酸化增加无关。
远程缺血预处理可抑制接受双联抗血小板治疗的冠心病患者在接触凝血酶和胶原蛋白时血小板αⅡbβ3的构象激活。这些发现表明,RIPC在冠心病中对血小板激活具有激动剂特异性抑制作用,且先前使用P2Y抑制剂并不能消除这种作用。