Krag Andreas E, Hvas Anne-Mette, Hvas Christine L, Kiil Birgitte J
Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research Unit, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Jan 21;8(1):e2591. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002591. eCollection 2020 Jan.
The free flap failure rate is 5% in head and neck microsurgical reconstruction, and ischemia-reperfusion injury is an important mechanism behind this failure rate. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) is a recent intervention targeting ischemia-reperfusion injury. The aim of the present study was to investigate if RIPC improved clinical outcomes in microsurgical reconstruction.
Head and neck cancer patients undergoing tumor resection and microsurgical reconstruction were included in a randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized (1:1) to RIPC or sham intervention administered intraoperatively just before transfer of the free flap. RIPC was administered by four 5-minute periods of upper extremity occlusion and reperfusion. Clinical data were prospectively collected in the perioperative period and at follow-up on postoperative days 30 and 90. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed.
Sixty patients were randomized to RIPC (n = 30) or sham intervention (n = 30). All patients received allocated intervention. No patients were lost to follow up. At 30-day follow-up, flap failure occurred in 7% of RIPC patients (n = 2) and 3% of sham patients (n = 1) with the relative risk and 95% confidence interval 2.0 [0.2;20.9], = 1.0. The rate of pedicle thrombosis was 10% (n = 3) in both groups with relative risk 1.0 [0.2;4.6], = 1.0. The flap failure rate did not change at 90-day follow-up.
RIPC is safe and feasible but does not affect clinical outcomes in head and neck cancer patients undergoing microsurgical reconstruction.
在头颈部显微外科重建中,游离皮瓣失败率为5%,而缺血再灌注损伤是导致该失败率的重要机制。远程缺血预处理(RIPC)是一种针对缺血再灌注损伤的最新干预措施。本研究的目的是调查RIPC是否能改善显微外科重建的临床结果。
纳入接受肿瘤切除和显微外科重建的头颈部癌症患者进行一项随机对照试验。患者被随机(1:1)分为RIPC组或假干预组,在游离皮瓣转移前术中给予干预。RIPC通过对上肢进行4个5分钟的阻断和再灌注来实施。前瞻性收集围手术期及术后第30天和第90天随访时的临床数据,并进行意向性分析。
六十例患者被随机分为RIPC组(n = 30)或假干预组(n = 30)。所有患者均接受了分配的干预,无患者失访。在30天随访时,RIPC组7%(n = 2)的患者皮瓣失败,假干预组3%(n = 1)的患者皮瓣失败,相对风险及95%置信区间为2.0 [0.2;20.9],P = 1.0。两组蒂部血栓形成率均为10%(n = 3),相对风险为1.0 [0.2;4.6],P = 1.0。在90天随访时皮瓣失败率未发生变化。
RIPC安全可行,但对接受显微外科重建的头颈部癌症患者的临床结果无影响。