Amsalem Ayelet R, Marom Barak, Shapira Keren E, Hirschhorn Tal, Preisler Livia, Paarmann Pia, Knaus Petra, Henis Yoav I, Ehrlich Marcelo
Department of Neurobiology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Department of Cell Research and Immunology, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Mol Biol Cell. 2016 Feb 15;27(4):716-30. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-08-0547. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
The expression and function of transforming growth factor-β superfamily receptors are regulated by multiple molecular mechanisms. The type II BMP receptor (BMPRII) is expressed as two alternatively spliced forms, a long and a short form (BMPRII-LF and -SF, respectively), which differ by an ∼500 amino acid C-terminal extension, unique among TGF-β superfamily receptors. Whereas this extension was proposed to modulate BMPRII signaling output, its contribution to the regulation of receptor expression was not addressed. To map regulatory determinants of BMPRII expression, we compared synthesis, degradation, distribution, and endocytic trafficking of BMPRII isoforms and mutants. We identified translational regulation of BMPRII expression and the contribution of a 3' terminal coding sequence to this process. BMPRII-LF and -SF differed also in their steady-state levels, kinetics of degradation, intracellular distribution, and internalization rates. A single dileucine signal in the C-terminal extension of BMPRII-LF accounted for its faster clathrin-mediated endocytosis relative to BMPRII-SF, accompanied by mildly faster degradation. Higher expression of BMPRII-SF at the plasma membrane resulted in enhanced activation of Smad signaling, stressing the potential importance of the multilayered regulation of BMPRII expression at the plasma membrane.
转化生长因子-β超家族受体的表达和功能受多种分子机制调控。II型骨形态发生蛋白受体(BMPRII)以两种选择性剪接形式表达,即长形式和短形式(分别为BMPRII-LF和-SF),二者在约500个氨基酸的C末端延伸区域存在差异,这在转化生长因子-β超家族受体中是独一无二的。尽管有人提出这种延伸可调节BMPRII的信号输出,但它对受体表达调控的贡献尚未得到研究。为了确定BMPRII表达的调控决定因素,我们比较了BMPRII异构体和突变体的合成、降解、分布及内吞运输过程。我们确定了BMPRII表达的翻译调控以及3'末端编码序列在此过程中的作用。BMPRII-LF和-SF在稳态水平、降解动力学、细胞内分布及内化速率方面也存在差异。BMPRII-LF的C末端延伸区域中的单个双亮氨酸信号导致其网格蛋白介导的内吞作用比BMPRII-SF更快,同时降解也稍快。BMPRII-SF在质膜上的较高表达导致Smad信号的激活增强,这突出了质膜上BMPRII表达多层调控的潜在重要性。