Department of Gynecology & Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen, Germany.
GlaxoSmithKline, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage SG1 2NY, UK.
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Mar;140(3):443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.12.027. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
AGO-OVAR 16 demonstrated that pazopanib maintenance therapy significantly increased progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with ovarian cancer whose disease had not progressed after first-line therapy. In a sub-study, we evaluated the effect of clinically important germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations on PFS.
Of 940 AGO-OVAR 16 participants, 664 had BRCA1/2 exon sequencing data (pazopanib, n=335; placebo, n=329). A Cox model was used to test the association between genetic variants and PFS.
Ninety-seven of 664 patients (15%) carried clinically important BRCA1/2 mutations (BRCA1/2 carriers: pazopanib 14%, placebo 16%). Median PFS was longer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers than in BRCA1/2 non-carriers in the placebo arm (30.3 vs 14.1 months, hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.78; P=0.0031); a similar non-significant trend was noted with pazopanib (30.2 vs 17.7 months, hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI: 0.40-1.03; P=0.069). Among BRCA1/2 non-carriers, PFS was longer for pazopanib-treated patients than placebo-treated patients (17.7 vs 14.1 months, hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.62-0.97; P=0.024). Among BRCA1/2 carriers, there was no significant PFS difference between treatments, although numbers were small (pazopanib, 46; placebo, 51), resulting in a wide CI (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% CI: 0.66-2.82).
Patients with clinically important BRCA1/2 mutations had better prognosis. BRCA1/2 mutation status might be added as strata in future trials in primary ovarian cancer.
AGO-OVAR 16 研究表明,对于一线治疗后病情未进展的卵巢癌患者,帕唑帕尼维持治疗显著延长了无进展生存期(PFS)。在一项亚组研究中,我们评估了临床重要的种系 BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变对 PFS 的影响。
在 940 名 AGO-OVAR 16 参与者中,有 664 名患者有 BRCA1/2 外显子测序数据(帕唑帕尼组 n=335;安慰剂组 n=329)。采用 Cox 模型检验遗传变异与 PFS 的相关性。
664 例患者中有 97 例(15%)携带临床重要的 BRCA1/2 突变(BRCA1/2 携带者:帕唑帕尼组 14%,安慰剂组 16%)。在安慰剂组中,BRCA1/2 突变携带者的中位 PFS 长于 BRCA1/2 非携带者(30.3 个月 vs. 14.1 个月,风险比 0.48;95%置信区间[CI]:0.29-0.78;P=0.0031);在帕唑帕尼组中,也观察到类似但无统计学意义的趋势(30.2 个月 vs. 17.7 个月,风险比 0.64;95%CI:0.40-1.03;P=0.069)。在 BRCA1/2 非携带者中,与安慰剂相比,帕唑帕尼治疗患者的 PFS 更长(17.7 个月 vs. 14.1 个月,风险比 0.77;95%CI:0.62-0.97;P=0.024)。BRCA1/2 携带者中,两种治疗方法的 PFS 差异无统计学意义,尽管数量较少(帕唑帕尼组 46 例,安慰剂组 51 例),置信区间较宽(风险比 1.36;95%CI:0.66-2.82)。
携带临床重要 BRCA1/2 突变的患者预后较好。BRCA1/2 突变状态可能作为未来卵巢癌一线治疗临床试验的分层因素。