Davies Melanie J, Gray Laura J, Troughton Jacqui, Gray Alastair, Tuomilehto Jaakko, Farooqi Azhar, Khunti Kamlesh, Yates Thomas
Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK; Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit, Leicester, UK.
Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Prev Med. 2016 Mar;84:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
Prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a priority in healthcare, but there is a lack of evidence investigating how to effectively translate prevention research into a UK primary care setting. We assessed whether a structured education programme targeting lifestyle and behaviour change was effective at preventing progression to T2DM in people with pre-diabetes.
Forty-four general practices were randomised to receive either standard care or a 6hour group structured education programme with an annual refresher course, and regular phone contact. Participants were followed up for 3years. The primary outcome was progression to T2DM.
Eight hundred and eighty participants were included (36% female, mean age 64years, 16% ethnic minority group); 131 participants developed T2DM. There was a non-significant 26% reduced risk of developing T2DM in the intervention arm compared to standard care (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.48, 1.14, p=0.18). The reduction in T2DM risk when excluding those who did not attend the initial education session was also non-significant (HR 0.65, 0.41, 1.03, p=0.07). There were statistically significant improvements in HbA1c (-0.06, -0.11, -0.01), LDL cholesterol (-0.08, -0.15, -0.01), sedentary time (-26.29, -45.26, -7.32) and step count (498.15, 162.10, 834.20) when data were analysed across all time points.
This study suggests that a relatively low resource, pragmatic diabetes prevention programme resulted in modest benefits to biomedical, lifestyle and psychosocial outcomes, however the reduction to the risk of T2DM did not reach significance. The findings have important implications for future research and primary care.
2型糖尿病(T2DM)的预防是医疗保健的重点,但缺乏关于如何有效将预防研究转化为英国初级保健环境的证据。我们评估了一项针对生活方式和行为改变的结构化教育计划在预防糖尿病前期患者进展为T2DM方面是否有效。
44家普通诊所被随机分配接受标准护理或为期6小时的小组结构化教育计划,该计划包括年度复习课程和定期电话联系。对参与者进行了3年的随访。主要结局是进展为T2DM。
纳入了880名参与者(女性占36%,平均年龄64岁,少数民族群体占16%);131名参与者发展为T2DM。与标准护理相比,干预组发生T2DM的风险降低了26%,但差异无统计学意义(风险比0.74,95%置信区间0.48,1.14,p = 0.18)。排除未参加初始教育课程的人后,T2DM风险的降低也无统计学意义(风险比0.65,0.41,1.03,p = 0.07)。在分析所有时间点的数据时,糖化血红蛋白(-0.06,-0.11,-0.01)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(-0.08,-0.15,-0.01)、久坐时间(-26.29,-45.26,-7.32)和步数(498.15,162.10,834.20)有统计学意义的改善。
本研究表明,一项资源相对较少、务实的糖尿病预防计划对生物医学、生活方式和心理社会结局产生了适度益处,然而T2DM风险的降低未达到显著水平。这些发现对未来研究和初级保健具有重要意义。