• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估和监测转化研究组织中性别平等的成就指标:原理与研究方案

Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in translational research organisations: a rationale and study protocol.

作者信息

Ovseiko Pavel V, Edmunds Laurel D, Pololi Linda H, Greenhalgh Trisha, Kiparoglou Vasiliki, Henderson Lorna R, Williamson Catherine, Grant Jonathan, Lord Graham M, Channon Keith M, Lechler Robert I, Buchan Alastair M

机构信息

Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.

National Initiative on Gender, Culture and Leadership in Medicine: C-Change, Brandeis University Women's Studies Research Center, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 7;6(1):e009022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009022.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009022
PMID:26743702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4716190/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Translational research organisations (TROs) are a core component of the UK's expanding research base. Equity of career opportunity is key to ensuring a diverse and internationally competitive workforce. The UK now requires TROs to demonstrate how they are supporting gender equity. Yet, the evidence base for documenting such efforts is sparse. This study is designed to inform the acceleration of women's advancement and leadership in two of the UK's leading TROs--the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centres (BRCs) in Oxford and London--through the development, application and dissemination of a conceptual framework and measurement tool.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A cross-sectional retrospective evaluation. A conceptual framework with markers of achievement and corresponding candidate metrics has been specifically designed for this study based on an adapted balanced scorecard approach. It will be refined with an online stakeholder consultation and semistructured interviews to test the face validity and explore practices and mechanisms that influence gender equity in the given settings. Data will be collected via the relevant administrative databases. A comparison of two funding periods (2007-2012 and 2012-2017) will be carried out.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The University of Oxford Clinical Trials and Research Governance Team and the Research and Development Governance Team of Guy's and St Thomas' National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust reviewed the study and deemed it exempt from full ethics review. The results of the study will be used to inform prospective planning and monitoring within the participating NIHR BRCs with a view to accelerating women's advancement and leadership. Both the results of the study and its methodology will be further disseminated to academics and practitioners through the networks of collaborating TROs, relevant conferences and articles in peer-reviewed journals.

摘要

引言

转化研究组织(TROs)是英国不断扩大的研究基础的核心组成部分。职业机会平等是确保拥有多样化且具有国际竞争力的劳动力的关键。英国现在要求转化研究组织展示其如何支持性别平等。然而,记录此类努力的证据基础却很薄弱。本研究旨在通过开发、应用和传播一个概念框架及测量工具,为加速英国两个领先的转化研究组织——牛津和伦敦的国家卫生研究院(NIHR)生物医学研究中心(BRCs)中女性的职业发展和领导力提供信息。

方法与分析

一项横断面回顾性评估。基于一种经过调整的平衡计分卡方法,专门为本研究设计了一个带有成就标志和相应候选指标的概念框架。将通过在线利益相关者咨询和半结构化访谈对其进行完善,以测试表面效度,并探索在给定环境中影响性别平等的实践和机制。数据将通过相关行政数据库收集。将对两个资助期(2007 - 2012年和2012 - 2017年)进行比较。

伦理与传播

牛津大学临床试验与研究治理团队以及盖伊和圣托马斯国民健康服务(NHS)基金会信托的研发治理团队对该研究进行了审查,并认为其无需进行全面伦理审查。该研究结果将用于为参与研究的NIHR生物医学研究中心的前瞻性规划和监测提供信息,以期加速女性的职业发展和领导力提升。研究结果及其方法都将通过合作的转化研究组织网络、相关会议以及同行评审期刊上的文章进一步传播给学者和从业者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6462/4716190/2704441832c6/bmjopen2015009022f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6462/4716190/2704441832c6/bmjopen2015009022f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6462/4716190/2704441832c6/bmjopen2015009022f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in translational research organisations: a rationale and study protocol.评估和监测转化研究组织中性别平等的成就指标:原理与研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 7;6(1):e009022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009022.
2
Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in a UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: A two-factor model.评估和监测英国国家健康研究所生物医学研究中心性别公平的指标:双因素模型。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0239589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239589. eCollection 2020.
3
Perceptions of gender equity and markers of achievement in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a qualitative study.国家卫生研究院生物医学研究中心性别平等认知与成就指标:一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 24;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00904-4.
4
Maximising value from a United Kingdom Biomedical Research Centre: study protocol.从英国生物医学研究中心实现价值最大化:研究方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Aug 14;15(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0237-1.
5
A large National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre facilitates impactful cross-disciplinary and collaborative translational research publications and research collaboration networks: a bibliometric evaluation study.一个大型的英国国家健康研究所(NIHR)生物医学研究中心促进了有影响力的跨学科和协作转化研究出版物和研究合作网络:一项文献计量评估研究。
J Transl Med. 2021 Nov 27;19(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-03149-x.
6
Athena SWAN and gender diversity: a UK-based retrospective cohort study.雅典娜 SWAN 和性别多样性:基于英国的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e032915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032915.
7
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
8
Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis.在英国国家健康研究所生物医学研究中心的科学著作中实现性别均等:文献计量学分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):e037935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037935.
9
Genome-wide association study meta-analysis of dizygotic twinning illuminates genetic regulation of female fecundity.全基因组关联研究荟萃分析揭示了二倍体双胞胎的遗传调控对女性生育能力的影响。
Hum Reprod. 2024 Jan 5;39(1):240-257. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead247.
10
How policy can help develop and sustain workforce capacity in UK dementia research: insights from a career tracking analysis and stakeholder interviews.政策如何助力英国痴呆症研究领域培养并维持劳动力能力:来自职业追踪分析及利益相关者访谈的见解
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 31;6(8):e012052. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012052.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of gender equity and markers of achievement in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a qualitative study.国家卫生研究院生物医学研究中心性别平等认知与成就指标:一项定性研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Sep 24;20(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00904-4.
2
Women's Authorship of Reviews in Ophthalmic Journals Over Time.眼科期刊中女性作者的综述随时间变化的情况。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021 Nov 16;10(6):590-594. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000444.
3
Bibliometric Analysis of the English Musculoskeletal Literature over the Last 30 Years.

本文引用的文献

1
Organisational culture and post-merger integration in an academic health centre: a mixed-methods study.学术健康中心的组织文化与合并后整合:一项混合方法研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jan 22;15:25. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0673-3.
2
The effect of an intervention to break the gender bias habit for faculty at one institution: a cluster randomized, controlled trial.一项打破某机构教师性别偏见习惯的干预措施的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
Acad Med. 2015 Feb;90(2):221-30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000552.
3
New metrics for translational research.
过去 30 年英文肌肉骨骼文献的计量学分析。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2021 Apr 27;2021:5548481. doi: 10.1155/2021/5548481. eCollection 2021.
4
Gender parity in scientific authorship in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a bibliometric analysis.在英国国家健康研究所生物医学研究中心的科学著作中实现性别均等:文献计量学分析。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 23;11(3):e037935. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037935.
5
Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in a UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: A two-factor model.评估和监测英国国家健康研究所生物医学研究中心性别公平的指标:双因素模型。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0239589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239589. eCollection 2020.
6
Understanding the Athena SWAN award scheme for gender equality as a complex social intervention in a complex system: analysis of Silver award action plans in a comparative European perspective.理解雅典娜天鹅奖方案作为一个复杂系统中的性别平等复杂社会干预:从比较的欧洲视角分析银质奖行动计划。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 14;18(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0527-x.
7
Athena SWAN and gender diversity: a UK-based retrospective cohort study.雅典娜 SWAN 和性别多样性:基于英国的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 12;10(2):e032915. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032915.
8
Structural Transformation to Attain Responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2): Protocol for a Horizon 2020 Funded European Multicenter Project to Promote Responsible Research and Innovation.实现负责任生物科学的结构转型(STARBIOS2):一项由“地平线2020”资助的欧洲多中心项目促进负责任研究与创新的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 7;8(3):e11745. doi: 10.2196/11745.
9
A systematic review of interventions to support the careers of women in academic medicine and other disciplines.一项支持学术医学和其他学科女性职业发展的干预措施的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 22;8(3):e020380. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020380.
10
ISRIA statement: ten-point guidelines for an effective process of research impact assessment.ISRIA 声明:有效研究影响评估过程的十点指导方针。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 8;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0281-5.
转化研究的新指标。
Lancet Respir Med. 2014 Aug;2(8):e13-4. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70150-X.
4
Women and academic medicine: a review of the evidence on female representation.女性与学术医学:关于女性代表性的证据综述
J R Soc Med. 2014 Jul;107(7):259-263. doi: 10.1177/0141076814528893. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
5
Gender distribution of U.S. medical school faculty by academic track type.美国医学院教师的学术轨道类型的性别分布。
Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):312-7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000089.
6
Differences in research funding for women scientists: a systematic comparison of UK investments in global infectious disease research during 1997-2010.女性科学家研究资金的差异:对英国在 1997-2010 年期间全球传染病研究投资的系统比较。
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 9;3(12):e003362. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003362.
7
Assessing excellence in translational cancer research: a consensus based framework.评估转化性癌症研究中的卓越性:一个基于共识的框架。
J Transl Med. 2013 Oct 29;11:274. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-274.
8
The translational research impact scale: development, construct validity, and reliability testing.转化研究影响量表:开发、结构效度和信度测试。
Eval Health Prof. 2014 Mar;37(1):50-70. doi: 10.1177/0163278713506112. Epub 2013 Sep 30.
9
Changing the culture of academic medicine: the C-Change learning action network and its impact at participating medical schools.改变学术医学文化:C-Change 学习行动网络及其在参与医学院校的影响。
Acad Med. 2013 Sep;88(9):1252-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829e84e0.
10
Gender disparity among US anaesthesiologists: are women underrepresented in academic ranks and scholarly productivity?美国麻醉医师中的性别差异:学术地位和学术成果方面是否女性代表性不足?
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Sep;57(8):1058-64. doi: 10.1111/aas.12141. Epub 2013 Jun 17.