Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, UCL Royal Free Campus, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 9;3(12):e003362. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003362.
There has not previously been a systematic comparison of awards for research funding in infectious diseases by sex. We investigated funding awards to UK institutions for all infectious disease research from 1997 to 2010, across disease categories and along the research and development continuum.
Systematic comparison.
Data were obtained from several sources for awards from the period 1997 to 2010 and each study assigned to-disease categories; type of science (preclinical, phases I-III trials, product development, implementation research); categories of funding organisation. Fold differences and statistical analysis were used to compare total investment, study numbers, mean grant and median grant between men and women.
6052 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 4357 grants (72%) awarded to men and 1695 grants (28%) awarded to women, totalling £2.274 billion. Of this, men received £1.786 billion (78.5%) and women £488 million (21.5%). The median value of award was greater for men (£179 389; IQR £59 146-£371 977) than women (£125 556; IQR £30 982-£261 834). Awards were greater for male principal investigators (PIs) across all infectious disease systems, excepting neurological infections and sexually transmitted infections. The proportion of total funding awarded to women ranged from 14.3% in 1998 to 26.8% in 2009 (mean 21.4%), and was lowest for preclinical research at 18.2% (£285.5 million of £1.573 billion) and highest for operational research at 30.9% (£151.4 million of £489.7 million).
There are consistent differences in funding received by men and women PIs: women have fewer funded studies and receive less funding in absolute and in relative terms; the median funding awarded to women is lower across most infectious disease areas, by funder, and type of science. These differences remain broadly unchanged over the 14-year study period.
此前尚未对传染病研究经费的性别授予进行系统比较。我们调查了英国机构在 1997 年至 2010 年期间所有传染病研究的资金授予情况,涵盖了疾病类别和研究与开发的各个方面。
系统比较。
从多个来源获取了 1997 年至 2010 年期间的资金授予数据,并将每项研究分配到疾病类别;科学类型(临床前、I-III 期试验、产品开发、实施研究);资金组织的类别。使用倍数差异和统计分析来比较男性和女性之间的总投资、研究数量、平均拨款和中位数拨款。
最终分析包括 6052 项研究,其中包括 4357 项(72%)授予男性和 1695 项(28%)授予女性,总计 22.74 亿英镑。其中,男性获得 17.866 亿英镑(78.5%),女性获得 4.880 亿英镑(21.5%)。男性获奖者的中位数为 179389 英镑(IQR 59146-371977 英镑),高于女性的 125556 英镑(IQR 30982-261834 英镑)。除了神经感染和性传播感染外,所有传染病系统的男性主要研究者(PI)的奖项都更大。女性获得的总资金比例从 1998 年的 14.3%到 2009 年的 26.8%(平均 21.4%)不等,在临床前研究中最低为 18.2%(28.55 亿英镑,占 157.3 亿英镑的 1.573 亿英镑),在业务研究中最高为 30.9%(15.14 亿英镑,占 48.97 亿英镑的 489.7 亿英镑)。
男性和女性 PI 获得的资金存在一致的差异:女性的研究获得的资金较少,无论是绝对值还是相对值;在大多数传染病领域,女性获得的资金中位数都较低,无论是资金来源还是科学类型。在 14 年的研究期间,这些差异基本保持不变。