Peterson Mark D, Zhang Peng, Choksi Palak, Markides Kyriakos S, Al Snih Soham
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan Hospital and Health Systems, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Suite 300, Ann Arbor, MI, 48108, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sports Med. 2016 May;46(5):619-28. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0463-z.
Despite the known links between weakness and early mortality, what remains to be fully understood is the extent to which strength preservation is associated with protection from cardiometabolic diseases, such as diabetes.
The purposes of this study were to determine the association between muscle strength and diabetes among adults, and to identify age- and sex-specific thresholds of low strength for detection of risk.
A population-representative sample of 4066 individuals, aged 20-85 years, was included from the combined 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data sets. Strength was assessed using a handheld dynamometer, and the single highest reading from either hand was normalized to body mass. A logistic regression model was used to assess the association between normalized grip strength and risk of diabetes, as determined by haemoglobin A1c levels ≥6.5 % (≥48 mmol/mol), while controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, anthropometric measures and television viewing time.
For every 0.05 decrement in normalized strength, there were 1.26 times increased adjusted odds for diabetes in men and women. Women were at lower odds of having diabetes (odds ratio 0.49; 95 % confidence interval 0.29-0.82). Age, waist circumference and lower income were also associated with diabetes. The optimal sex- and age-specific weakness thresholds to detect diabetes were 0.56, 0.50 and 0.45 for men at ages of 20-39, 40-59 and 60-80 years, respectively, and 0.42, 0.38 and 0.33 for women at ages of 20-39, 40-59 and 60-80 years, respectively.
We present thresholds of strength that can be incorporated into a clinical setting for identifying adults who are at risk of developing diabetes and might benefit from lifestyle interventions to reduce risk.
尽管已知虚弱与早期死亡率之间存在联系,但力量保持在多大程度上与预防糖尿病等心血管代谢疾病相关仍有待充分了解。
本研究的目的是确定成年人肌肉力量与糖尿病之间的关联,并确定用于检测风险的按年龄和性别划分的低力量阈值。
纳入了2011 - 2012年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)合并数据集的4066名年龄在20 - 85岁的具有人群代表性的样本。使用手持测力计评估力量,并将两只手中的最高读数按体重进行标准化。采用逻辑回归模型评估标准化握力与糖尿病风险之间的关联,糖尿病风险由糖化血红蛋白水平≥6.5%(≥48 mmol/mol)确定,同时控制社会人口学特征、人体测量指标和看电视时间。
标准化力量每降低0.05,男性和女性患糖尿病的调整后比值增加1.26倍。女性患糖尿病的几率较低(比值比0.49;95%置信区间0.29 - 0.82)。年龄、腰围和低收入也与糖尿病相关。检测糖尿病的最佳按性别和年龄划分的虚弱阈值,20 - 39岁男性为0.56,40 - 59岁男性为0.50,60 - 80岁男性为0.45;20 - 39岁女性为0.42,40 - 59岁女性为0.38,60 - 80岁女性为0.33。
我们提出了可纳入临床环境的力量阈值,用于识别有患糖尿病风险且可能从生活方式干预中受益以降低风险的成年人。