Igarashi Tatsuo, Ishii Takuro, Aoe Tomohiko, Yu Wen-Wei, Ebihara Yuma, Kawahira Hiroshi, Isono Shiro, Naya Yukio
1 Center for Frontier Medical Engineering, Chiba University , Chiba, Japan .
2 Department of Anesthesiology, Asahi General Hospital , Asahi, Japan .
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Feb;26(2):122-8. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0461. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries are performed under carbon dioxide insufflation. Switching from gas to an isotonic irrigant introduces several benefits and avoids some adverse effects of gas insufflation. We developed an irrigating device and apparatus designed for single-incision laparoscopic surgery and tested its advantages and drawbacks during surgery in a porcine model.
Six pigs underwent surgical procedures under general anesthesia. A 30-cm extracorporeal cistern was placed over a 5-6-cm abdominal incision. The abdomen was irrigated with warm saline that was drained via a suction tube placed near the surgical field and continuously recirculated through a closed circuit equipped with a hemodialyzer as a filter. Irrigant samples from two pigs were cultured to check for bacterial and fungal contamination. Body weight was measured before and after surgery in four pigs that had not received treatments affecting hemodynamics or causing diuresis.
One-way flow of irrigant ensured laparoscopic vision by rinsing blood from the surgical field. Through a retroperitoneal approach, cystoprostatectomy was successfully performed in three pigs, nephrectomy in two, renal excision in two, and partial nephrectomy in one, under simultaneous ultrasonographic monitoring. Through a transperitoneal approach, liver excision and hemostasis with a bipolar sealing device were performed in three pigs, and bladder pedicle excision was performed in one pig. Bacterial and fungal contamination of the irrigant was observed on the draining side of the circuit, but the filter captured the contaminants. Body weight increased by a median of 2.1% (range, 1.2-4.4%) of initial weight after 3-5 hours of irrigation.
Surgery under irrigation is feasible and practical when performed via a cistern through a small abdominal incision. This method is advantageous, especially in the enabling of continuous and free-angle ultrasound observation of parenchymal organs. Adverse effects of abdominal irrigation need further assessment before use in humans.
腹腔镜手术和机器人辅助手术在二氧化碳气腹下进行。从气体切换到等渗灌洗液有诸多益处,并可避免气腹的一些不良反应。我们开发了一种专为单切口腹腔镜手术设计的冲洗装置和设备,并在猪模型手术中测试了其优缺点。
六头猪在全身麻醉下接受手术。在一个5 - 6厘米的腹部切口上方放置一个30厘米的体外水箱。用温盐水冲洗腹部,通过放置在手术区域附近的吸引管排出,并通过配备血液透析器作为过滤器的闭合回路持续再循环。对两头猪的灌洗液样本进行培养,以检查细菌和真菌污染情况。对未接受影响血流动力学或导致利尿治疗的四头猪在手术前后测量体重。
灌洗液的单向流动通过冲洗手术区域的血液确保了腹腔镜视野。通过腹膜后途径,在超声实时监测下,三头猪成功进行了膀胱前列腺切除术,两头进行了肾切除术,两头进行了肾脏切除术,一头进行了部分肾切除术。通过经腹途径,三头猪进行了肝脏切除并用双极密封装置止血,一头猪进行了膀胱蒂切除术。在回路的引流侧观察到灌洗液存在细菌和真菌污染,但过滤器捕获了污染物。冲洗3 - 5小时后,体重中位数增加了初始体重的2.1%(范围为1.2 - 4.4%)。
通过小腹部切口经水箱进行冲洗手术是可行且实用的。这种方法具有优势,特别是能够对实质器官进行连续且多角度的超声观察。腹部冲洗的不良反应在用于人体之前需要进一步评估。