Suppr超能文献

提高结直肠癌筛查的参与率:粪便检测后再进行血液非侵入性检测的序贯式提供的随机对照试验

Improving Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: a Randomised Controlled Trial of Sequential Offers of Faecal then Blood Based Non-Invasive Tests.

作者信息

Symonds Erin L, Pedersen Susanne, Cole Stephen R, Massolino Joseph, Byrne Daniel, Guy John, Backhouse Patricia, Fraser Robert J, LaPointe Lawrence, Young Graeme P

机构信息

Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Bedford Park, Australia E-mail :

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(18):8455-60. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.18.8455.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor participation rates are often observed in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs utilising faecal occult blood tests. This may be from dislike of faecal sampling, or having benign bleeding conditions that can interfere with test results. These barriers may be circumvented by offering a blood-based DNA test for screening. The aim was to determine if program participation could be increased by offering a blood test following faecal immunochemical test (FIT) non-participation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

People were invited into a CRC screening study through their General Practice and randomised into control or intervention (n=600/group). Both groups were mailed a FIT (matching conventional screening programs). Participation was defined as FIT completion within 12wk. Intervention group non-participants were offered a screening blood test (methylated BCAT1/IKZF1). Overall participation was compared between the groups.

RESULTS

After 12wk, FIT participation was 82% and 81% in the control and intervention groups. In the intervention 96 FIT non- participants were offered the blood test - 22 completed this test and 19 completed the FIT instead. Total screening in the intervention group was greater than the control (88% vs 82%, p<0.01). Of 12 invitees who indicated that FIT was inappropriate for them (mainly due to bleeding conditions), 10 completed the blood test (83%).

CONCLUSIONS

Offering a blood test to FIT non-participants increased overall screening participation compared to a conventional FIT program. Blood test participation was particularly high in invitees who considered FIT to be inappropriate for them. A blood test may be a useful adjunct test within a FIT program.

摘要

背景

在使用粪便潜血试验的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查项目中,常常观察到参与率较低的情况。这可能是因为人们不喜欢粪便采样,或者存在可能干扰检测结果的良性出血状况。通过提供基于血液的DNA检测进行筛查,或许可以规避这些障碍。本研究的目的是确定在粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)未参与者中提供血液检测是否能够提高项目参与率。

材料与方法

通过全科医疗邀请人们参与一项CRC筛查研究,并将其随机分为对照组和干预组(每组n = 600)。两组均收到一份FIT检测(与传统筛查项目一致)。参与定义为在12周内完成FIT检测。干预组的未参与者会收到一次筛查血液检测(甲基化BCAT1/IKZF1)的邀请。比较两组的总体参与情况。

结果

12周后,对照组和干预组的FIT参与率分别为82%和81%。在干预组中,96名FIT未参与者收到了血液检测邀请,其中22人完成了该检测,另有19人转而完成了FIT检测。干预组的总筛查率高于对照组(88%对82%,p<0.01)。在12名表示FIT检测不适合他们的受邀者中(主要是由于出血状况),有10人完成了血液检测(83%)。

结论

与传统的FIT项目相比,为FIT未参与者提供血液检测提高了总体筛查参与率。在认为FIT检测不适合自己的受邀者中,血液检测的参与率特别高。血液检测可能是FIT项目中一项有用的辅助检测。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验