• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

库拉索岛结直肠癌筛查决策——目标人群访谈。

Decision-making on colorectal cancer screening in Curaçao - interviews with the target population.

机构信息

Caribbean Prevention Center (Fundashon Prevenshon), Willemstad, Curaçao.

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 27;23(1):1437. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16335-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-16335-x
PMID:37501171
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10373279/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

During the first year of the population based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program on Curaçao, about 20% of invitees participated. This study explored the target population's perceptions and awareness on CRC (screening), beliefs on the program provision, their preferences and information needs for informed decision-making.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 23 individuals, who were not yet invited for CRC screening, were recorded, transcribed, coded and analyzed.

RESULTS

CRC (screening) was discussed in the context of personal health, where own responsibility and food were important. Cancer was perceived as an unpredictable disease that causes suffering and leads to death and was also associated with fear. Despite being aware of the program, most respondents were not familiar with the screening procedure. Provision of the screening program was regarded positively and as an opportunity to contribute to health improvement. This seemed related to the expressed trust in the Caribbean Prevention Center (program organizer). Respondents preferred to make independent decisions about CRC screening participation. A personal approach, visual aids and media were the preferred sources of information.

CONCLUSION

The results of our interviews suggest that it may be beneficial to provide information on CRC screening in Curaçao within the context of personal health. While including sensitivity to fears and respect for the autonomy of the target population. Finally, electronic media maybe useful in supporting informed decision-making.

摘要

背景

在库拉索岛基于人群的结直肠癌(CRC)筛查计划的第一年,约有 20%的受邀者参与其中。本研究探讨了目标人群对 CRC(筛查)的看法和意识、对项目提供的信念、他们的偏好和信息需求,以做出明智的决策。

方法

对 23 名尚未受邀进行 CRC 筛查的个体进行了半结构化访谈,对访谈进行了录音、转录、编码和分析。

结果

CRC(筛查)是在个人健康背景下讨论的,其中个人责任和食物很重要。癌症被视为一种不可预测的疾病,会导致痛苦和死亡,也与恐惧有关。尽管大多数受访者了解该计划,但他们并不熟悉筛查程序。提供筛查计划被认为是积极的,可以为改善健康做出贡献。这似乎与对加勒比预防中心(项目组织者)的信任有关。受访者更喜欢对 CRC 筛查参与做出独立的决定。个人方法、视觉辅助工具和媒体是受访者首选的信息来源。

结论

我们的访谈结果表明,在库拉索岛,在个人健康背景下提供 CRC 筛查信息可能是有益的。同时包括对恐惧的敏感性和对目标人群自主权的尊重。最后,电子媒体可能有助于支持知情决策。

相似文献

1
Decision-making on colorectal cancer screening in Curaçao - interviews with the target population.库拉索岛结直肠癌筛查决策——目标人群访谈。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 27;23(1):1437. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16335-x.
2
Health literacy skills for informed decision making in colorectal cancer screening: Perceptions of screening invitees and experts.结直肠癌筛查中知情决策的健康素养技能:筛查邀请对象和专家的看法。
Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):636-646. doi: 10.1111/hex.12658. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
3
Do people with a different goal-orientation or specific focus make different decisions about colorectal cancer-screening participation?具有不同目标导向或特定关注点的人是否会对结直肠癌筛查的参与做出不同的决策?
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 28;14(2):e0213003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213003. eCollection 2019.
4
Decision-making styles in the context of colorectal cancer screening.结直肠癌筛查背景下的决策风格。
BMC Psychol. 2020 Feb 3;8(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-0381-1.
5
Communication about colorectal cancer screening in Britain: public preferences for an expert recommendation.英国结直肠癌筛查的沟通:公众对专家建议的偏好。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Dec 4;107(12):1938-43. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.512. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
6
Autonomous and informed decision-making: The case of colorectal cancer screening.自主和知情决策:以结直肠癌筛查为例。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0233308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233308. eCollection 2020.
7
Accessibility of standardized information of a national colorectal cancer screening program for low health literate screening invitees: A mixed method study.针对健康素养较低的结直肠癌筛查受邀者的国家结直肠癌筛查计划标准化信息的可及性:一项混合方法研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Feb;100(2):327-336. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
8
Patient preferences on general health and colorectal cancer screening decision-making: Results from a national survey.患者对一般健康和结直肠癌筛查决策的偏好:来自全国性调查的结果。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):1034-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.033. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
9
Informed decision-making and colorectal cancer screening: is it occurring in primary care?知情决策与结直肠癌筛查:在初级保健中是否正在发生?
Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S23-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817dc496.
10
Health literacy and informed decision making regarding colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.结直肠癌筛查的健康素养与知情决策:一项系统综述
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Aug;25(4):575-82. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv005. Epub 2015 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Information needs for cancer screening and associated factors of information-seeking behaviour: a qualitative systematic review.癌症筛查的信息需求及信息寻求行为的相关因素:一项定性系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):3606. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21096-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to colonoscopy following fecal immunochemical test screening for colorectal cancer: A key informant interview study.结直肠癌免疫化学粪便检测筛查后行结肠镜检查的障碍和促进因素:关键知情人访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Jun;105(6):1652-1662. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.022. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
2
Evaluating and strengthening the health system of Curaҫao to improve its performance for future outbreaks of vector-borne diseases.评估和加强库拉索岛的卫生系统,以提高其应对未来虫媒传染病爆发的能力。
Parasit Vectors. 2021 Sep 26;14(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-05011-x.
3
Breast Cancer in the Caribbean.加勒比地区的乳腺癌
Cureus. 2021 Aug 9;13(8):e17042. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17042. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
The role of disgust as an emotional barrier to colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.厌恶情绪作为结直肠癌筛查参与的情感障碍的作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
Psychol Health. 2023 Mar;38(3):389-408. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2021.1967351. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
5
Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.影响患者遵医嘱参与公共资金资助的结直肠癌筛查项目的因素:系统评价。
Public Health. 2021 Jan;190:67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
6
Barriers of colorectal cancer screening test among adults in the Saudi Population: A Cross-Sectional study.沙特人群中成年人结直肠癌筛查试验的障碍:一项横断面研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Oct 26;20:101235. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101235. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
What Factors Influence Non-Participation Most in Colorectal Cancer Screening? A Discrete Choice Experiment.哪些因素对结直肠癌筛查的不参与影响最大?一项离散选择实验。
Patient. 2021 Mar;14(2):269-281. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00477-w. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
How people of African Caribbean or Irish ethnicity cope with long-term health conditions in UK community settings: A systematic review of qualitative, quantitative and mixed method studies.非裔加勒比或爱尔兰裔人群在英国社区环境中应对长期健康状况的方式:定性、定量和混合方法研究的系统评价。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Mar;29(2):319-327. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13181. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Strategies for increasing participation in mail-out colorectal cancer screening programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.增加邮件式结直肠癌筛查计划参与率的策略:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2019 Nov 4;8(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1170-x.
10
Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors.结直肠癌的流行病学:发病率、死亡率、生存率及危险因素。
Prz Gastroenterol. 2019;14(2):89-103. doi: 10.5114/pg.2018.81072. Epub 2019 Jan 6.