Kato T
Keio J Med. 1989 Jun;38(2):136-51. doi: 10.2302/kjm.38.136.
The etiology of choledochal cyst has been investigated by clinicians and pathologists primarily of Germany, Austria, United States, United Kingdom, and Japan from the end of the last century, but Japanese investigators contributed greatly to the study of the relationship between choledochal cyst and anomalous junction of the pancreaticobiliary ductal system. Heid (1893) is considered to be the first to document choledochal cyst associated with anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction, but it was probably Kozumi et al. (1916) that first evaluated anomalous junction in relation to the etiology of choledochal cyst. Yotsuyanagi (1936), who is noted for his work on the etiological studies of choledochal cyst, attached particular importance to anomalous junction and attempted to establish a relationship between dysplasia of the primordial common bile duct and its anomalous junction with the pancreatic duct. It is no exaggeration to say that this area was led by Japanese investigators even after the introduction of Babbitt's anomalous junction theory (1968). In this review, etiological theories of choledochal cyst and their changes with time were discussed separately for those before and after the advent of Babbitt's anomalous junction theory (1968) with particular reference to the causative relationship between anomalous junction and choledochal cyst. Although there is as yet no definite answer to this problem, the theories advanced to date are considered to be summarized as the following three major lines of thought: 1) bile duct dilatation and anomalous junction are both congenital dysplasia occurring simultaneously during the embryonic development, 2) bile duct dilatation is a secondary change induced by influx of pancreatic juice into the biliary tract due to anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction, and 3) bile duct dilatation is induced secondarily by stenosis of the distal bile duct, which is a part of complex anomaly of the pancreaticobility system. Which of these etiological mechanisms is more important than others must still be clarified, but these three factors are considered to be interrelated with one another in the etiology of choledochal cyst.
自上世纪末以来,德国、奥地利、美国、英国和日本的临床医生和病理学家对胆总管囊肿的病因进行了研究,但日本研究人员在胆总管囊肿与胰胆管系统异常连接关系的研究中做出了巨大贡献。海德(1893年)被认为是第一个记录与胰胆管异常连接相关的胆总管囊肿的人,但最早评估异常连接与胆总管囊肿病因关系的可能是小泉等人(1916年)。以胆总管囊肿病因研究工作而闻名的米津柳吉(1936年)特别重视异常连接,并试图建立原始胆总管发育异常与其与胰管异常连接之间的关系。毫不夸张地说,即使在巴比特异常连接理论(1968年)提出之后,这一领域仍由日本研究人员引领。在这篇综述中,分别讨论了巴比特异常连接理论(1968年)出现前后胆总管囊肿的病因理论及其随时间的变化,特别提及了异常连接与胆总管囊肿之间的因果关系。尽管这个问题尚无定论,但迄今为止提出的理论可归纳为以下三大主要思路:1)胆管扩张和异常连接都是胚胎发育过程中同时发生的先天性发育异常;2)胆管扩张是由于胰胆管异常连接导致胰液流入胆道而引起的继发性改变;3)胆管扩张是由远端胆管狭窄继发引起的,远端胆管狭窄是胰胆管系统复杂异常的一部分。这些病因机制中哪一个比其他机制更重要仍有待阐明,但这三个因素在胆总管囊肿的病因中被认为是相互关联的。