Suppr超能文献

运用生态瞬时评估法(EMA)对极高危男男性行为者(MSM)的性活动进行研究。

Using Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to Study Sex Events Among Very High-Risk Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM).

作者信息

Wray Tyler B, Kahler Christopher W, Monti Peter M

机构信息

Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Box G-S121-4, Providence, RI, 02912, USA.

出版信息

AIDS Behav. 2016 Oct;20(10):2231-2242. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1272-y.

Abstract

MSM continue to represent the largest share of new HIV infections in the United States each year due to high infectivity associated with unprotected anal sex. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has the potential to provide a unique view of how high-risk sexual events occur in the real world and can impart detailed information about aspects of decision-making, antecedents, and consequences that accompany these events. EMA may also produce more accurate data on sexual behavior by assessing it soon after its occurrence. We conducted a study involving 12 high-risk MSM to explore the acceptability and feasibility of a 30 day, intensive EMA procedure. Results suggest this intensive assessment strategy was both acceptable and feasible to participants. All participants provided response rates to various assessments that approached or were in excess of their targets: 81.0 % of experience sampling assessments and 93.1 % of daily diary assessments were completed. However, comparing EMA reports with a Timeline Followback (TLFB) of the same 30 day period suggested that participants reported fewer sexual risk events on the TLFB compared to EMA, and reported a number of discrepancies about specific behaviors and partner characteristics across the two methods. Overall, results support the acceptability, feasibility, and utility of using EMA to understand sexual risk events among high-risk MSM. Findings also suggest that EMA and other intensive longitudinal assessment approaches could yield more accurate data about sex events.

摘要

由于与无保护肛交相关的高传染性,男男性行为者(MSM)每年在美国新增艾滋病毒感染病例中所占比例仍然最大。生态瞬时评估(EMA)有可能提供一个独特的视角,了解现实世界中高危性行为是如何发生的,并能提供有关这些事件的决策、前因和后果等方面的详细信息。EMA还可能通过在性行为发生后不久进行评估,得出关于性行为的更准确数据。我们开展了一项研究,涉及12名高危男男性行为者,以探讨为期30天的密集EMA程序的可接受性和可行性。结果表明,这种密集评估策略对参与者来说既可以接受又可行。所有参与者对各种评估的回复率接近或超过了目标:81.0%的经验抽样评估和93.1%的每日日记评估完成。然而,将EMA报告与同一30天期间的时间线回溯法(TLFB)进行比较发现,与EMA相比,参与者在TLFB上报告的性风险事件较少,并且两种方法在特定行为和性伴特征方面存在一些差异。总体而言,结果支持使用EMA来了解高危男男性行为者中性风险事件的可接受性、可行性和实用性。研究结果还表明,EMA和其他密集纵向评估方法可以得出关于性事件的更准确数据。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Development of Mobile Contingency Management for Cannabis Use Reduction.开发移动应急管理以减少大麻使用。
Behav Ther. 2024 Jan;55(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2023.03.004. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验