Xu Jiayun, Kim Kyounghae, Kurtz Melissa, Nolan Marie T
College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Feb;37:1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.031. Epub 2015 Dec 12.
There is a need for scholars to be prepared as peer reviewers in order to ensure the continual publication of quality science. However, developing the skills to craft a constructive critique can be difficult. In this commentary, we discuss the use of a group peer review mentoring model for PhD students to gain experience in peer review from a faculty member who is experienced in peer review. Central to this model, was the opportunity for each student and faculty mentor to openly discuss their critique of the manuscript. Through this enriching experience, novice researchers were able to learn the elements of a good peer review, better determine a manuscript's substantive contribution to science, and advance the quality of their own manuscript writing.
为了确保高质量科学研究成果的持续发表，学者们需要做好担任同行评审员的准备。然而，培养撰写建设性评论的技能可能具有挑战性。在这篇评论文章中，我们讨论了一种针对博士生的小组同行评审指导模式，目的是让他们从一位经验丰富的同行评审教员那里获得同行评审经验。该模式的核心是为每个学生和教员导师提供公开讨论他们对手稿评论的机会。通过这种丰富的经历，新手研究人员能够学习到高质量同行评审的要素，更好地确定一篇手稿对科学的实质性贡献，并提高他们自己的手稿写作质量。
