Zahn Daniela, Adams Johanna, Krohn Jeanette, Wenzel Mario, Mann Caroline G, Gomille Lara K, Jacobi-Scherbening Vera, Kubiak Thomas
Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Health Psychology, Binger Str. 14-16, D-55122 Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Health Psychology, Binger Str. 14-16, D-55122 Mainz, Germany; University Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Institute for Teachers' Health, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Kupferbergterrasse 17-19, D-55116 Mainz, Germany.
Biol Psychol. 2016 Mar;115:9-26. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.12.007. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
Heart rate variability (HRV) has been suggested as a biological correlate of self-control. Whereas many studies found a relationship between HRV at rest and self-control, effect sizes vary substantially across studies in magnitude and direction. This meta-analysis evaluated the association between HRV at rest and self-control in laboratory tasks, with a particular focus on the identification of moderating factors (task characteristics, methodological aspects of HRV assessment, demographics). Overall, 24 articles with 26 studies and 132 effects (n=2317, mean age=22.44, range 18.4-57.8) were integrated (random effects model with robust variance estimation). We found a positive average effect of r=0.15, 95% CI [0.088; 0.221], p<0.001 with a moderate heterogeneity (I(2)=56.10%), but observed evidence of publication bias. Meta-regressions did not reveal significant moderators. Due to the presence of potential publication bias, our results have to be interpreted cautiously.
心率变异性(HRV)已被认为是自我控制的生物学关联指标。尽管许多研究发现静息心率变异性与自我控制之间存在关联,但效应大小在不同研究中的幅度和方向差异很大。本荟萃分析评估了静息心率变异性与实验室任务中的自我控制之间的关联,特别关注调节因素(任务特征、心率变异性评估的方法学方面、人口统计学)的识别。总体而言,纳入了24篇文章中的26项研究和132个效应(n = 2317,平均年龄 = 22.44,范围18.4 - 57.8)(采用稳健方差估计的随机效应模型)。我们发现平均效应为r = 0.15,95%置信区间[0.088;0.221],p < 0.001,异质性适中(I² = 56.10%),但观察到存在发表偏倚的证据。元回归未揭示显著的调节因素。由于存在潜在的发表偏倚,我们的结果必须谨慎解释。