Kim Youngwan, Nunnenkamp Peter, Bagchi Chandreyee
Assistant Professor, Division of Language and Diplomacy, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, South Korea.
Senior Economist, Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiel, Germany.
Disasters. 2016 Oct;40(4):591-620. doi: 10.1111/disa.12176. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) are widely believed to raise their flag in humanitarian hotspots with a strong media presence in order to attract higher private donations. We assess this hypothesis by comparing the changes in donations between US-based NGOs with and without aid operations in the four countries most affected by the tsunami in the Indian Ocean in 2004. Simple before-after comparisons tend to support the hypothesis that 'flying the flag' helps attract higher private donations. However, performing a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) approach, we find only weak indications that private donors systematically and strongly preferred NGOs with operations in the region. Extended specifications of the baseline regressions reveal that our major findings are robust. NGO heterogeneity matters in some respects, but the DDD results hold when accounting for proxies of the NGOs' reputation and experience.
人们普遍认为,非政府组织(NGO)会在媒体关注度高的人道主义热点地区竖起旗帜,以吸引更多私人捐款。我们通过比较2004年印度洋海啸受灾最严重的四个国家中有无援助行动的美国非政府组织的捐款变化,来评估这一假设。简单的前后对比倾向于支持“竖起旗帜”有助于吸引更多私人捐款这一假设。然而,采用双重差分法(DDD)进行分析时,我们发现仅有微弱迹象表明私人捐助者系统且强烈地偏好那些在该地区开展行动的非政府组织。对基线回归的扩展说明显示,我们的主要发现是稳健的。非政府组织的异质性在某些方面很重要,但在考虑非政府组织声誉和经验的代理变量时,双重差分法的结果依然成立。