Borrelli Nicla, Ugolini Clara, Giannini Riccardo, Antonelli Alessandro, Giordano Mirella, Sensi Elisa, Torregrossa Liborio, Fallahi Poupak, Miccoli Paolo, Basolo Fulvio
Unit of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Surgical, Medical, and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Cancer Cytopathol. 2016 May;124(5):340-9. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21681. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is routinely used in the preoperative evaluation of thyroid nodules. However, 15% to 30% of aspirations yield indeterminate cytologic findings. Because the assessment of BRAF mutations seems to improve the diagnostic accuracy, this study evaluated BRAF mutations with Sanger sequencing and real-time methods in 650 consecutive thyroid aspirates. In addition, the expression of a large number of genes involved in basement membrane remodeling, extracellular matrix proteolysis, and cell adhesion was studied in both benign and malignant nodules to identify new diagnostic tools. In this prospective series, despite the use of a very sensitive BRAF mutational testing method, the frequency of a BRAF alteration being identified in indeterminate FNA samples was 3 of 68. Expression analysis revealed several genes that were differentially expressed between benign and malignant nodules (transforming growth factor, cadherin 1, collagen α1, catenin α1, integrin α3, and fibronectin 1 [FN1]), between follicular adenomas and follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (FN1, laminin γ1, integrin β2, connective tissue growth factor, catenin δ1, and integrin αV), and between BRAF-wild-type and BRAF-mutated papillary thyroid carcinomas (TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 1; catenin α1; secreted phosphoprotein 1; FN1; ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 1; and selectin L). These data were partially confirmed with real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis and immunohistochemistry. When the cost/benefit ratio of the procedures was taken into account, BRAF mutational testing failed to increase diagnostic accuracy in cytologically indeterminate nodules. However, the additional analysis of the expression of specific molecular markers could have possible utility as a diagnostic tool, although further evidence based on a large series of samples is needed before definitive conclusions can be drawn. Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124:340-9. © 2015 American Cancer Society.
细针穿刺抽吸术(FNA)常用于甲状腺结节的术前评估。然而,15%至30%的抽吸样本会产生不确定的细胞学结果。由于BRAF突变评估似乎能提高诊断准确性,本研究采用桑格测序法和实时检测方法对650例连续的甲状腺抽吸样本进行BRAF突变评估。此外,研究了良性和恶性结节中大量参与基底膜重塑、细胞外基质蛋白水解及细胞黏附的基因表达,以确定新的诊断工具。在这个前瞻性系列研究中,尽管使用了非常敏感的BRAF突变检测方法,但在不确定的FNA样本中发现BRAF改变的频率为68例中的3例。表达分析揭示了一些在良性和恶性结节之间(转化生长因子、钙黏蛋白1、胶原蛋白α1、连环蛋白α1、整合素α3和纤连蛋白1 [FN1])、滤泡性腺瘤和甲状腺乳头状癌滤泡变体之间(FN1、层粘连蛋白γ1、整合素β2、结缔组织生长因子、连环蛋白δ1和整合素αV)以及BRAF野生型和BRAF突变型甲状腺乳头状癌之间(金属蛋白酶组织抑制因子1;连环蛋白α1;分泌性磷蛋白1;FN1;含血小板反应蛋白基序的金属蛋白酶1;和选择素L)差异表达的基因。这些数据通过实时聚合酶链反应分析和免疫组织化学得到了部分证实。考虑到这些检测方法的成本效益比,BRAF突变检测未能提高细胞学不确定结节的诊断准确性。然而,特定分子标志物表达的额外分析可能作为一种诊断工具具有潜在用途,尽管在得出明确结论之前还需要基于大量样本的进一步证据。《癌症细胞病理学》2016年;124:340 - 349。©2015美国癌症协会