Tomson Torbjörn, Surges Rainer, Delamont Robert, Haywood Serena, Hesdorffer Dale C
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Epileptology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Epilepsia. 2016 Jan;57 Suppl 1:4-16. doi: 10.1111/epi.13234.
The risk of dying suddenly and unexpectedly is increased 24- to 28-fold among young people with epilepsy compared to the general population, but the incidence of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) varies markedly depending on the epilepsy population. This article first reviews risk factors and biomarkers for SUDEP with the overall aim of enabling identification of epilepsy populations with different risk levels as a background for a discussion of possible intervention strategies. The by far most important clinical risk factor is frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS), but nocturnal seizures, early age at onset, and long duration of epilepsy have been identified as additional risk factors. Lack of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment or, in the context of clinical trials, adjunctive placebo versus active treatment is associated with increased risks. Despite considerable research, reliable electrophysiologic (electrocardiography [ECG] or electroencephalography [EEG]) biomarkers of SUDEP risk remain to be established. This is an important limitation for prevention strategies and intervention studies. There is a lack of biomarkers for SUDEP, and until validated biomarkers are found, the endpoint of interventions to prevent SUDEP must be SUDEP itself. These interventions, be they pharmacologic, seizure-detection devices, or nocturnal supervision, require large numbers. Possible methods for assessing prevention measures include public health community interventions, self-management, and more traditional (and much more expensive) randomized clinical trials.
与普通人群相比,癫痫患者突然意外死亡的风险增加了24至28倍,但癫痫性猝死(SUDEP)的发生率因癫痫患者群体的不同而有显著差异。本文首先综述了SUDEP的危险因素和生物标志物,总体目标是能够识别不同风险水平的癫痫患者群体,以此作为讨论可能的干预策略的背景。迄今为止,最重要的临床危险因素是全面强直阵挛发作(GTCS)的频率,但夜间发作、发病年龄早和癫痫病程长也被确定为额外的危险因素。未接受抗癫痫药物(AED)治疗,或在临床试验中,辅助使用安慰剂与使用活性药物治疗相比,会增加风险。尽管进行了大量研究,但SUDEP风险的可靠电生理(心电图[ECG]或脑电图[EEG])生物标志物仍有待确定。这是预防策略和干预研究的一个重要局限。目前缺乏SUDEP的生物标志物,在找到经过验证的生物标志物之前,预防SUDEP的干预措施的终点必须是SUDEP本身。这些干预措施,无论是药物治疗、癫痫发作检测设备还是夜间监护,都需要大量的投入。评估预防措施的可能方法包括公共卫生社区干预、自我管理以及更传统(且成本更高)的随机临床试验。